Dennis,
After the security vulnerability notice (http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/cisco-sa-20090727-wlc.shtml
) we looked at it, but our Cisco rep has advised us to move to
5.2.193.0 instead. We have 13 WiSMs and 6 4400's supporting 2800+
access points.
James Nesbitt
Wireless Enginee
Hi Dennis,
We have just completed upgrading to 6.0 . Will let you know how it goes. We
have 4 Wisms and 460 aps. We upgraded WCS to 6.0 and the interface is much
better then previous versions.
Peter.
-Original Message-
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mai
See below...
Daniel Bennett
IT Security Analyst
Pennsylvania College of Technology
One College Ave
Williamsport PA, 17701
570.329.4989
-Original Message-
From: Matt Haile
Sent: Wednesday, August 05, 2009 12:30 PM
To: Daniel Bennett
Subject: RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] WiSM 6.0.182.0
Yes, we
ollege Ave
Williamsport PA, 17701
570.329.4989
-Original Message-
From: Matt Haile
Sent: Wednesday, August 05, 2009 12:30 PM
To: Daniel Bennett
Subject: RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] WiSM 6.0.182.0
Yes, we have been running it for about a month with minor problems. This is
what I've seen so
UBC upgraded our campus (39 controllers consisting of 4402's 4404's WiSM's and
5508's) on July 18th to 6.0.182.
-We had some AP's with Static IP's that needed attention.
-We also noticed that the wired ACL in 6.0x doesn't work - we noticed this even
during our 6.0 beta test.
-AP's that were l
I've been running 6.0.182.0 since it released with nothing but positive results.
Pretty much everything (bug fix wise) that was put in 5.2.193 was rolled into
6.0.182.0. I've been working with Cisco WNBU for about a year on various items,
especially the radio code, and the last engineering build
ISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Sent: Saturday, August 8, 2009 1:29:54 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] WiSM 6.0.182.0
I've been running 6.0.182.0 since it released with nothing but positive results.
Pretty much everything (bug fix wise) that was put in 5.2.193 was rolled into
2009 5:11 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] WiSM 6.0.182.0
UBC upgraded our campus (39 controllers consisting of 4402's 4404's WiSM's and
5508's) on July 18th to 6.0.182.
-We had some AP's with Static IP's that needed attenti
@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] WiSM 6.0.182.0
Hi,
We also upgraded to 6.0
We have several aps on busses using HREAP. For some reason clients were not
able to get a valid ip and we had to revert to the previous version of code.
Anyone else seen this issue?
Another issue is some
.
-Original Message-
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:wireless-...@listserv.educause.edu] On Behalf Of Peter Arbouin
Sent: Wednesday, August 19, 2009 10:14 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] WiSM 6.0.182.0
Hi,
We also
riginal Message -
From: "Peter Arbouin"
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Sent: Wednesday, August 19, 2009 11:14:02 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] WiSM 6.0.182.0
Hi,
We also upgraded to 6.0
We have several aps on busses using HREAP. For some reason clie
lf Of Peter Arbouin
> Sent: Wednesday, August 19, 2009 11:14 PM
> To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
> Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] WiSM 6.0.182.0
>
> Hi,
>
> We also upgraded to 6.0
> We have several aps on busses using HREAP. For some reason clients were
> not ab
Original Message-
> From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
> [mailto:wireless-...@listserv.educause.edu] On Behalf Of Garry Peirce
> Sent: Thursday, August 20, 2009 6:28 PM
> To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
> Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] WiSM 6.0.182.0
&g
13 matches
Mail list logo
