strange WLC behavior

2015-12-03 Thread John York
After a year of pretty much rock solid behavior we’ve had two instances this week where EAP failed for some or all of the users on our WLC 5508 (7.6.130.0). For some users it uses EAP-PEAP-MSChapV2 to a Windows AD server running NPS. For others it uses EAP-TLS to Cisco ACS. Both were experien

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] strange WLC behavior

2015-12-03 Thread Oliver Elliott
The 7.6.x range was buggy as hell so I'm not surprised. Get off there asap! On 3 December 2015 at 16:15, John York wrote: > After a year of pretty much rock solid behavior we’ve had two instances > this week where EAP failed for some or all of the users on our WLC 5508 > (7.6.130.0). For some u

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] strange WLC behavior

2015-12-03 Thread Matthew Newton
On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 04:17:12PM +, Oliver Elliott wrote: > The 7.6.x range was buggy as hell so I'm not surprised. Get off there asap! Not as buggy as 7.4.x... we ran 7.6 for a year quite happily. All Cisco software releases are buggy... just depends on whether the bugs affect your particu

RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] strange WLC behavior

2015-12-03 Thread Danny Eaton
riginal Message- From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv [mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Matthew Newton Sent: Thursday, December 03, 2015 10:37 AM To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] strange WLC behavior On Thu, Dec 03

RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] strange WLC behavior

2015-12-03 Thread T. Shayne Ghere
--Original Message- From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv [mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Matthew Newton Sent: Thursday, December 03, 2015 10:37 AM To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] strange WLC behavior On Thu, De

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] strange WLC behavior

2015-12-03 Thread John York
>> > After a year of pretty much rock solid behavior we’ve had two instances >> > this week where EAP failed for some or all of the users on our WLC 5508 > >In what way? Clients just wouldn't connect. I didn't find anything in the WLC logs that helped me, but probably I just didn't understand wh