https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13185
--- Comment #4 from Alexis La Goutte ---
and the key ?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
___
Sent via:Wireshark-bugs mail
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13182
Alexis La Goutte changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||alexis.lagou...@gmail.com
---
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13183
Jim Young changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |CONFIRMED
CC|
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13182
Guy Harris changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|Dissection engine |Extras
|(libwiresh
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13186
Bug ID: 13186
Summary: Buildbot crash output: fuzz-2016-11-28-2043.pcap
Product: Wireshark
Version: unspecified
Hardware: x86-64
URL: https://www.wireshark.org/download/a
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13187
Bug ID: 13187
Summary: Buildbot crash output: fuzz-2016-11-30-31444.pcap
Product: Wireshark
Version: unspecified
Hardware: x86-64
URL: https://www.wireshark.org/download/
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13188
Bug ID: 13188
Summary: bcp_bpdu size reports not header size, but all data
underneath and its header size in UI
Product: Wireshark
Version: 2.2.2
Hardware: x86-64
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11420
--- Comment #6 from Gerrit Code Review ---
Change 18989 had a related patch set uploaded by Peter Wu:
sip: register with Websocket dissector (RFC 7118)
https://code.wireshark.org/review/18989
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13185
--- Comment #5 from mathiasb...@arcor.de ---
Hi,
you can close this ticket, i have checked this another time, the packets are
decrypted, but I was irritated that the EAPOL key wasn't decrypted. In the last
version I have see the ip-address
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11420
--- Comment #7 from Gerrit Code Review ---
Change 18989 merged by Anders Broman:
sip: register with Websocket dissector (RFC 7118)
https://code.wireshark.org/review/18989
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11420
Gerrit Code Review changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13188
--- Comment #1 from Jaap Keuter ---
If you can attach the actual capture instead of a partial screenshot, then
there's data to work with and verify a possible fix. Use TraceWrangler to
obfuscate the capture if you like.
--
You are receiv
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13175
--- Comment #21 from Pascal Quantin ---
Nigel, did you have the opportunity to try the test release from comment #15? I
cannot be sure your issue is resolved unless you test it.
Thanks,
Pascal.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
Yo
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13189
Bug ID: 13189
Summary: Exception closing http exported objects window
Product: Wireshark
Version: 2.2.2
Hardware: x86
OS: Windows NT
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13190
Bug ID: 13190
Summary: Add timestamp option to extcap
Product: Wireshark
Version: Git
Hardware: x86
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: Major
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13190
Dario Lombardo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||maina...@ntop.org,
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12787
Dario Lombardo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|Low |Medium
Severity|Normal
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13190
--- Comment #1 from Peter Wu ---
Copying comments from a related patch https://code.wireshark.org/review/18721 :
What about using timestamps with greater precision?
See https://doc.qt.io/qt-5/qdatetime.html#fromMSecsSinceEpoch
The timest
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13190
Dario Lombardo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|Low |Medium
Severity|Major
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13189
Pascal Quantin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13174
Pascal Quantin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||david.cristo...@gmail.com
--- Co
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13174
Pascal Quantin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |CONFIRMED
Ever confirmed|0
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13174
Pascal Quantin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pascal.quan...@gmail.com
--- Com
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13189
--- Comment #2 from David ---
Hi Pascal.
Thanks for the update, I was trying to find it in the database but I couldn't.
Good to know that is solved now :)
Thanks!!
David
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13174
--- Comment #4 from Michael Mann ---
(In reply to Pascal Quantin from comment #3)
> Michael, as your patch has been merged, is there more work needed for GTK UI?
The merged patch fixes 2.2 branch, https://code.wireshark.org/review/18927 w
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13174
--- Comment #5 from Pascal Quantin ---
SHould not another bug be opened for the Gt GUI instead?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
___
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13191
Bug ID: 13191
Summary: Malformed Packet - SSL
Product: Wireshark
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: Major
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13191
tzahpahima...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |CONFIRMED
Ever confi
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13192
Bug ID: 13192
Summary: tshark doesn't respect
protocols.display_hidden_proto_items setting
Product: Wireshark
Version: Git
Hardware: All
OS: All
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13178
--- Comment #5 from Gerrit Code Review ---
Change 18985 merged by Gerald Combs:
Qt: Fix simple_dialog formatting.
https://code.wireshark.org/review/18985
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13178
Gerrit Code Review changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13178
--- Comment #6 from Gerrit Code Review ---
Change 18992 had a related patch set uploaded by Gerald Combs:
Qt: Fix simple_dialog formatting.
https://code.wireshark.org/review/18992
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13191
Alexis La Goutte changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||alexis.lagou...@gmail.com
--
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13193
Bug ID: 13193
Summary: Support for DTLS-SRTP (used by WebRTC) with SIP
signalling over Websockets
Product: Wireshark
Version: Git
Hardware: All
OS: A
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13193
--- Comment #1 from Peter Wu ---
Created attachment 15096
--> https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15096&action=edit
TLS 1.2 and DTLS 1.0 master secrets (SSLKEYLOGFILE) for dtls-srtp-ws-sip.pcapng
For this test I used "
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13193
--- Comment #2 from Gerrit Code Review ---
Change 18996 had a related patch set uploaded by Peter Wu:
DTLS: add support for use_srtp extension (RFC 5764)
https://code.wireshark.org/review/18996
--
You are receiving this mail because:
Yo
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13193
--- Comment #3 from Gerrit Code Review ---
Change 18997 had a related patch set uploaded by Peter Wu:
SDP: add basic ICE candidate attribute dissection (RFC 5245)
https://code.wireshark.org/review/18997
--
You are receiving this mail be
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13174
--- Comment #6 from Michael Mann ---
(In reply to Pascal Quantin from comment #5)
> SHould not another bug be opened for the Gt GUI instead?
Technically yes, but I was hoping someone familiar with the code could just
take a few minutes to
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13185
Michael Mann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|INCOMPLETE |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13049
--- Comment #29 from Michael Mann ---
*** Bug 13186 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
___
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13186
Michael Mann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13187
Michael Mann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13044
--- Comment #12 from Michael Mann ---
*** Bug 13187 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
___
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13044
--- Comment #13 from Guy Harris ---
Line 1102 in packet-cops.c is the one that tests cops_call->solicited in
if (
( (cops_call->op_code == COPS_MSG_REQ) &&
(op_code == COPS_MSG_D
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13044
--- Comment #14 from Guy Harris ---
In dissect_cops_pdu() we do:
if (!pinfo->fd->flags.visited) {
cops_call = wmem_new(wmem_file_scope(), cops_call_t);
cops_call->op_code = op_code;
cops_call->s
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13193
Jaap Keuter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |IN_PROGRESS
Ever confirmed|0
46 matches
Mail list logo
