https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13881
--- Comment #182 from Gerrit Code Review ---
Change 31571 had a related patch set uploaded by Alexis La Goutte:
QUIC: align display filter/variable name for some missing field
https://code.wireshark.org/review/31571
--
You are receiving
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15399
Dario Lombardo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15426
--- Comment #1 from a...@protonmail.com ---
Created attachment 16846
--> https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16846&action=edit
ARP Probe and ARP Announcement capture examples
No.1 is ARP Probe
No.3 is ARP Announcem
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15426
Bug ID: 15426
Summary: Add support for ARP Probe and ARP Announcement (RFC
5227)
Product: Wireshark
Version: 2.6.5
Hardware: x86-64
OS: Linux
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15247
Christopher Maynard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|2.6.4 |2.6.6
Summary|IO
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15247
--- Comment #2 from Landi ---
Yes, I just tested on 2.6.6, still jumping back to 01.01.70.
Version 2.6.6 (v2.6.6-0-gdf942cd8)Running on 64-bit Windows 10, build 17763,
with Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-7600U CPU @ 2.80GHz (with SSE4.2), with 3264
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12470
--- Comment #4 from Jaap Keuter ---
The latest build 2.6.7 with GTK+ 3.24.2 doesn't exhibit this issue anymore. So
leaving this RESOLVED/FIXED sounds good to me.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.__
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15425
Bug ID: 15425
Summary: Vcpkg integration can break our build.
Product: Wireshark
Version: unspecified
Hardware: x86
OS: Windows
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14064
Christopher Maynard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|INCOMPLETE |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13719
Christopher Maynard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13167
Christopher Maynard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
Status|
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12470
Christopher Maynard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12460
Christopher Maynard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8993
Christopher Maynard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|GTK+ UI |Extras
--- Comment #9 from C
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3523
--- Comment #6 from Gerald Combs ---
(In reply to Christopher Maynard from comment #5)
> (In reply to Gerald Combs from comment #3)
> > The "Privileges" section of doc/README.packaging suggests running dumpcap
> > setuid root and optionally
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8528
Christopher Maynard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
Status|C
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7935
Christopher Maynard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7318
Christopher Maynard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3523
Christopher Maynard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|GTK+ UI |Dumpcap
--- Comment #5 from
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11723
--- Comment #2 from Christopher Maynard ---
(In reply to Christopher Maynard from comment #1)
> Maybe this is the only issue left now?
Well, when the VoIP Calls dialog is closed, I also see a bunch (20 to be exact)
of the following lines
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11723
Christopher Maynard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|Major |Normal
--- Comment #1 from
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11698
Christopher Maynard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|Major |Normal
--- Comment #10 from
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11694
Christopher Maynard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONF
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11355
--- Comment #12 from Guy Harris ---
(In reply to Christopher Maynard from comment #11)
> (In reply to Guy Harris from comment #9)
> > For what it's worth, I tried it with Wireshark 2.6.6, still built with Qt
> > 5.3.2, on macOS 10.13.6, an
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11355
--- Comment #11 from Christopher Maynard ---
(In reply to Guy Harris from comment #10)
> "Closed" as in "this only happens on Snow Leopard, and Apple no longer
> supports Snow Leopard" or "closed" as in "Apple no longer supports Snow
> Leo
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11675
Gerald Combs changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11675
--- Comment #12 from Christopher Maynard ---
I don't have a retina display to test with, but my icons appear to look better
than those depicted in the attached screenshot. Perhaps this is due to the
fact that I'm using Qt 5.12.0? Is this
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11355
--- Comment #10 from Guy Harris ---
(In reply to Christopher Maynard from comment #7)
> (In reply to Guy Harris from comment #4)
> > The good news is that using Qt 5.5 appears to fix the problem.
> >
> > The *bad* news is that Qt 5.5 is l
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11355
--- Comment #9 from Guy Harris ---
(In reply to Guy Harris from comment #0)
> If I control+click in any of the panes of the main window, I get a context
> window, but, most of the time, selecting an item doesn't have any effect.
> On occa
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11355
--- Comment #8 from Guy Harris ---
(In reply to Guy Harris from comment #2)
> The Qt developers have made the "broken .pc files" probably *worse*, not
> *better*, in Qt 5.5 (or maybe they did so in 5.4), with some superfluous
> quoting of
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11546
Christopher Maynard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|1.99.x (Experimental) |Git
--
You are receiving t
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13953
--- Comment #9 from Kenneth Coombes ---
Hi, I'm just updating this ticket with a suggestion. I had written before that
the phone treats suboption 66 in the standard way. That is, there is nothing
proprietary about it for the phone. The
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11515
Christopher Maynard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UN
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11355
--- Comment #7 from Christopher Maynard ---
(In reply to Guy Harris from comment #4)
> The good news is that using Qt 5.5 appears to fix the problem.
>
> The *bad* news is that Qt 5.5 is linked with /usr/lib/libc++.1.dylib, which
> doesn'
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11302
--- Comment #1 from Christopher Maynard ---
> When changing the column widths on the Packet List (in Qt, at least), it
> appears that the widths are saved when explicitly closing wireshark.
> However, if I open another capture file after
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11273
Christopher Maynard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|1.99.x (Experimental) |Git
Hardware|x86
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11272
Christopher Maynard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15399
--- Comment #15 from Gerrit Code Review ---
Change 31465 merged by Roland Knall:
Qt: IO Graph correct color selection
https://code.wireshark.org/review/31465
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes._
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8269
Christopher Maynard changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.wireshark.org/
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11269
Christopher Maynard changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.wireshark.org/
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6104
Christopher Maynard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4659
Christopher Maynard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|1.4.0 |Git
--
You are receiving th
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3784
Christopher Maynard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Case sensitivity behavior |"Follow TCP|UDP Stream"
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14104
Christopher Maynard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|INCOMPLETE |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11237
--- Comment #9 from Christopher Maynard ---
(In reply to bailanlysoa from comment #7)
> Actually, I'm using 10.9.5 and any 1.99.x version I still got the same
> error. I just tried my luck on the recent builds but none of them was
> workin
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9002
Alon Bar-Lev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10922
Christopher Maynard changed:
What|Removed |Added
OS|Windows 7 |All
Hardware|x86
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11019
Christopher Maynard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|Major |Normal
Version|1
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10922
Christopher Maynard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |CONFIRMED
Severit
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9002
--- Comment #1 from Christopher Maynard ---
Is there any update about this bug? Is it still a problem using the latest
stable version of Wireshark and Qt UI? A lot has changed in the over 5 years
since this bug was filed.
--
You are rec
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15424
Mick Sanders changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |NOTABUG
Status|UNCONFI
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7667
Christopher Maynard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|1.8.0 |Git
Severity|Major
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5589
Christopher Maynard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15424
--- Comment #1 from Mick Sanders ---
Tried a complete uninstall of prior version. Tried to install v 2.9.0. Same
problem; hangs without writing a single file.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes._
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4777
Christopher Maynard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|Qt UI |GTK+ UI
Status|C
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15424
Bug ID: 15424
Summary: 2.6.6 installer hangs forever at "preparing for
installation"
Product: Wireshark
Version: 2.6.6
Hardware: x86-64
OS: macOS 10.
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4684
--- Comment #5 from Christopher Maynard ---
(In reply to Graham Bloice from comment #3)
> On current master QT, using columns as filters works except for Protocol and
> Info, instead the status bar displays "No filter available, try another
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4035
Christopher Maynard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|1.2.1 |Git
--
You are receiving th
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12744
Christopher Maynard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12744
--- Comment #8 from Alexander Okonnikov ---
Hi,
>From my side, I'm not interested in Qt UI (it's ugly, sorry); thus I don't use
Wireshark on Linux anymore for this reason. Hence, the bug is not actual for me
anymore.
Thanks.
--
You are
60 matches
Mail list logo