[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 15451] WISUN Channel Plan Spacing parsing incorrect

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15451 --- Comment #5 from James Ko --- Sorry.. forgot to include the Bug: tag in original review then pushed another review on the wrong branch. Please consider updated review: https://code.wireshark.org/review/31745 -- You are receiving

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 15451] WISUN Channel Plan Spacing parsing incorrect

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15451 --- Comment #4 from James Ko --- Created attachment 16874 --> https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16874=edit Channel Information Fields WiSUN specification of CH0, Channel Spacing, and Reserved bit-fields in the

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 15451] WISUN Channel Plan Spacing parsing incorrect

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15451 --- Comment #3 from James Ko --- Created attachment 16873 --> https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16873=edit WiSUN PAN Advertisment message with WiSUN Payload IE + Unicast Schedule IE -- You are receiving this mail

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 15451] WISUN Channel Plan Spacing parsing incorrect

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15451 --- Comment #2 from Gerrit Code Review --- Change 31748 had a related patch set uploaded by James Ko: Fix: WiSUN channel spacing in Unicast Schedule IE https://code.wireshark.org/review/31748 -- You are receiving this mail because: You

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 15446] Buildbot crash output: fuzz-2019-01-25-4370.pcap

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15446 Pascal Quantin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pascal.quan...@gmail.com

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 15455] Buildbot crash output: fuzz-2019-01-25-22135.pcap

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15455 Pascal Quantin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pascal.quan...@gmail.com

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 15446] Buildbot crash output: fuzz-2019-01-25-4370.pcap

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15446 --- Comment #4 from Pascal Quantin --- *** Bug 15455 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 15455] New: Buildbot crash output: fuzz-2019-01-25-22135.pcap

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15455 Bug ID: 15455 Summary: Buildbot crash output: fuzz-2019-01-25-22135.pcap Product: Wireshark Version: unspecified Hardware: x86-64 OS: Ubuntu Status:

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 15438] New version of Wireshark is failing to do what earlier versions did which to allow us to save as when open files from MessageAnalyzer to convert them to tcpdump pcap forma

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15438 Guy Harris changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|FIXED |NOTABUG -- You are receiving this

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 15438] New version of Wireshark is failing to do what earlier versions did which to allow us to save as when open files from MessageAnalyzer to convert them to tcpdump pcap forma

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15438 --- Comment #9 from Guy Harris --- (In reply to Abed Halabi from comment #8) > Created attachment 16870 [details] > Screenshots > > Please see attached screen shots as FYI So which version supported saving the file, and what did the

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 15454] Dissection of CAN packets based on a DBC specification

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15454 --- Comment #2 from Maksim Salau --- Created attachment 16872 --> https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16872=edit Sample DBC file -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 15454] Dissection of CAN packets based on a DBC specification

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15454 Maksim Salau changed: What|Removed |Added CC||maksim.sa...@gmail.com -- You

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 15454] Dissection of CAN packets based on a DBC specification

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15454 --- Comment #1 from Maksim Salau --- Created attachment 16871 --> https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16871=edit Sample capture -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 15454] New: Dissection of CAN packets based on a DBC specification

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15454 Bug ID: 15454 Summary: Dissection of CAN packets based on a DBC specification Product: Wireshark Version: Git Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 15451] WISUN Channel Plan Spacing parsing incorrect

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15451 Alexis La Goutte changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 15438] New version of Wireshark is failing to do what earlier versions did which to allow us to save as when open files from MessageAnalyzer to convert them to tcpdump pcap forma

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15438 --- Comment #8 from Abed Halabi --- Created attachment 16870 --> https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16870=edit Screenshots Please see attached screen shots as FYI We have a resolution to this issue. -- You are

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 15452] Dissector for IEEE 1609.4 (channel switching) for DSRC

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15452 --- Comment #1 from Anders Broman --- Again a tracefile would be helpful. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.___ Sent via:

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 15453] Dissector for IEEE 1609.3 Wave Service Announcement (WSA) for DSRC

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15453 --- Comment #1 from Anders Broman --- A trace file would be helpful. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.___ Sent via:

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 15438] New version of Wireshark is failing to do what earlier versions did which to allow us to save as when open files from MessageAnalyzer to convert them to tcpdump pcap forma

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15438 --- Comment #7 from Guy Harris --- (In reply to Abed Halabi from comment #6) > Thanks for looking into it Guy. I retraced my steps and made sure I had TCP > traffic in the file and still had the same issue but a colleague of mine >

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 15438] New version of Wireshark is failing to do what earlier versions did which to allow us to save as when open files from MessageAnalyzer to convert them to tcpdump pcap forma

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15438 Abed Halabi changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 15416] Display error in negative response time stats (gint displayed as unsigned)

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15416 Dario Lombardo changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 15453] Dissector for IEEE 1609.3 Wave Service Announcement (WSA) for DSRC

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15453 Neal Probert changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Dissector for 1609.3 Wave |Dissector for IEEE 1609.3

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 15453] Dissector for 1609.3 Wave Service Announcement (WSA) for DSRC

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15453 Neal Probert changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nprob...@probestar.net -- You

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 15453] New: Dissector for 1609.3 Wave Service Announcement (WSA) for DSRC

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15453 Bug ID: 15453 Summary: Dissector for 1609.3 Wave Service Announcement (WSA) for DSRC Product: Wireshark Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 15452] New: Dissector for IEEE 1609.4 (channel switching) for DSRC

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15452 Bug ID: 15452 Summary: Dissector for IEEE 1609.4 (channel switching) for DSRC Product: Wireshark Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status:

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 15451] New: WISUN Channel Plan Spacing parsing incorrect

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15451 Bug ID: 15451 Summary: WISUN Channel Plan Spacing parsing incorrect Product: Wireshark Version: 2.6.6 Hardware: x86 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 15446] Buildbot crash output: fuzz-2019-01-25-4370.pcap

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15446 --- Comment #3 from Pascal Quantin --- *** Bug 15450 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 15450] Buildbot crash output: fuzz-2019-01-25-8773.pcap

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15450 Pascal Quantin changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 15450] New: Buildbot crash output: fuzz-2019-01-25-8773.pcap

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15450 Bug ID: 15450 Summary: Buildbot crash output: fuzz-2019-01-25-8773.pcap Product: Wireshark Version: unspecified Hardware: x86-64 OS: Ubuntu Status:

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 15446] Buildbot crash output: fuzz-2019-01-25-4370.pcap

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15446 --- Comment #2 from Gerrit Code Review --- Change 31741 had a related patch set uploaded by Pascal Quantin: SMB2: check preauth_hash_current pointer validity before using it https://code.wireshark.org/review/31741 -- You are receiving

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 15449] Buildbot crash output: fuzz-2019-01-25-3514.pcap

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15449 Pascal Quantin changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 15446] Buildbot crash output: fuzz-2019-01-25-4370.pcap

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15446 --- Comment #1 from Pascal Quantin --- *** Bug 15449 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 15449] New: Buildbot crash output: fuzz-2019-01-25-3514.pcap

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15449 Bug ID: 15449 Summary: Buildbot crash output: fuzz-2019-01-25-3514.pcap Product: Wireshark Version: unspecified Hardware: x86-64 OS: Ubuntu Status:

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 3098] MS SQL 2005 tds protocol support

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3098 --- Comment #5 from Gerrit Code Review --- Change 31734 had a related patch set uploaded by Craig Jackson: TDS: Fix colmetadata handling of Text and Image types https://code.wireshark.org/review/31734 -- You are receiving this mail

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 15427] Data following a TCP ZeroWindowProbe is marked as retransmission and not passed to subdissectors

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15427 --- Comment #7 from Jasper Bongertz --- (In reply to Peter Wu from comment #6) > Hi Jasper, resident TCP expert :) > > Could you have a look at the above two patches, is it reasonable? Have you > ever run into this before? Hi Peter, I

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 15446] New: Buildbot crash output: fuzz-2019-01-25-4370.pcap

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15446 Bug ID: 15446 Summary: Buildbot crash output: fuzz-2019-01-25-4370.pcap Product: Wireshark Version: unspecified Hardware: x86-64 OS: Ubuntu Status:

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 7515] Possible leaks of wtap_pkthdr->opt_comment (packet comment)

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7515 Peter Wu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|CONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 15427] Data following a TCP ZeroWindowProbe is marked as retransmission and not passed to subdissectors

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15427 Peter Wu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jas...@packet-foo.com --- Comment #6

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 15427] Data following a TCP ZeroWindowProbe is marked as retransmission and not passed to subdissectors

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15427 --- Comment #4 from Gerrit Code Review --- Change 31731 had a related patch set uploaded by Peter Wu: TCP: do not mark data following a ZeroWindowProbe as retransmission https://code.wireshark.org/review/31731 -- You are receiving this

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 15427] Data following a TCP ZeroWindowProbe is marked as retransmission and not passed to subdissectors

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15427 --- Comment #5 from Gerrit Code Review --- Change 31732 had a related patch set uploaded by Peter Wu: TCP: pass data after a ZeroWindowProbe to subdissectors https://code.wireshark.org/review/31732 -- You are receiving this mail

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 15420] First reassembled out-of-order packet does not get "Reassembled in" marking

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15420 Peter Wu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|IN_PROGRESS |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 15420] First reassembled out-of-order packet does not get "Reassembled in" marking

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15420 --- Comment #3 from Gerrit Code Review --- Change 31720 merged by Peter Wu: tcp: fix reporting of "Reassembled in" for OoO initial segment https://code.wireshark.org/review/31720 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 15427] Data following a TCP ZeroWindowProbe is marked as retransmission and not passed to subdissectors

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15427 Peter Wu changed: What|Removed |Added Hardware|x86-64 |All OS|Windows 7