[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 15522] ieee80211: QoS Control not correctly dissected for MESH frames

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15522 --- Comment #2 from Gerrit Code Review --- Change 32084 merged by Alexis La Goutte: ieee80211: Dissect MESH specific bit of QoS Control https://code.wireshark.org/review/32084 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 15502] Editcap and TShark don't preserve name resolution and capture statistics information and don't handle IDBs in the middle of the file

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15502 Jim Young changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 15502] Editcap and TShark don't preserve name resolution and capture statistics information and don't handle IDBs in the middle of the file

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15502 --- Comment #7 from Jim Young --- Created attachment 16928 --> https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16928=edit macOS created pcapng file edited to have contiguous IDBs -- You are receiving this mail because: You are

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 15502] Editcap and TShark don't preserve name resolution and capture statistics information and don't handle IDBs in the middle of the file

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15502 Jim Young changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jyo...@gsu.edu --- Comment #6 from

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 15500] Should capinfos give information about name resolution and decryption secret information in the file?

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15500 Guy Harris changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 15523] New: Enhanced Bluetooth Mesh dissector sample files

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15523 Bug ID: 15523 Summary: Enhanced Bluetooth Mesh dissector sample files Product: Wireshark Version: Git Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 15454] Dissection of CAN packets based on a DBC specification

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15454 --- Comment #8 from Guy Harris --- (In reply to Maksim Salau from comment #7) > The parser is implemented by hand, possibly it should be rewritten to make > use of flex & bison. Either Flex & Bison/BYACC (if there's any .y file in the

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 15454] Dissection of CAN packets based on a DBC specification

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15454 --- Comment #7 from Maksim Salau --- Hi Michael, > What exactly is this and what other Wireshark constructs would you equate it > to? The dissector is for decoding data payload of CAN frames. This is somewhat similar to AUTOSAR NM "User

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 15512] pod2man is required for the build process, but that's not documented in the Developer's Guide

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15512 --- Comment #1 from Gerrit Code Review --- Change 32088 had a related patch set uploaded by Gerald Combs: WSDG: Let Windows developers know that they need Perl. https://code.wireshark.org/review/32088 -- You are receiving this mail

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 15513] If pod2man isn't found, we try building the documentation anyway, and that fails with a non-obvious error

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15513 --- Comment #1 from Gerald Combs --- A related question might be "When did Fedora stop shipping pod2man with its 'perl' package and why would they do such a thing?" According to the pod2man documentation[1], it was added to Perl core in

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 15521] ieee80211: Dissection of Mesh Control not always included

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15521 Alexis La Goutte changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 15521] ieee80211: Dissection of Mesh Control not always included

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15521 --- Comment #2 from Gerrit Code Review --- Change 32083 merged by Anders Broman: ieee80211: Always include Mesh Control dissection https://code.wireshark.org/review/32083 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 15522] ieee80211: QoS Control not correctly dissected for MESH frames

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15522 --- Comment #1 from Gerrit Code Review --- Change 32084 had a related patch set uploaded by cedric izoard: ieee80211: Dissect MESH specific bit of QoS Control https://code.wireshark.org/review/32084 -- You are receiving this mail

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 15521] ieee80211: Dissection of Mesh Control not always included

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15521 --- Comment #1 from Gerrit Code Review --- Change 32083 had a related patch set uploaded by cedric izoard: ieee80211: Always include Mesh Control dissection https://code.wireshark.org/review/32083 -- You are receiving this mail

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 15522] New: ieee80211: QoS Control not correctly dissected for MESH frames

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15522 Bug ID: 15522 Summary: ieee80211: QoS Control not correctly dissected for MESH frames Product: Wireshark Version: Git Hardware: x86 OS: Linux

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 15521] New: ieee80211: Dissection of Mesh Control not always included

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15521 Bug ID: 15521 Summary: ieee80211: Dissection of Mesh Control not always included Product: Wireshark Version: Git Hardware: x86 OS: Linux

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 15501] Add dissector for FSRVP

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15501 Alexis La Goutte changed: What|Removed |Added CC||alexis.lagou...@gmail.com

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 15426] Add support for ARP Probe and ARP Announcement (RFC 5227)

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15426 Alexis La Goutte changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED