[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16085] IBM WebSphere TLS stream doesn't get detected

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16085 Peter Wu changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 11723] VoIP Calls -> Play Streams (RTP Player) does not always show streams; audio is not smooth

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11723 Balling changed: What|Removed |Added CC||valery.zapo...@gmail.com --- Comment #3

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 15299] Telephony -> VOIP Calls -> Flow Sequences strange behavior after you Play stream

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15299 Balling changed: What|Removed |Added Version|3.0.2 |3.0.5 -- You are receiving this mail b

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16086] Old BSS to New BSS Info: Implementation of Decoding Function of 3GPP 48.008 Source Cell ID IE

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16086 Pascal Quantin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|INCOMPLETE |CONFIRMED -- You are receiving

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16086] Old BSS to New BSS Info: Implementation of Decoding Function of 3GPP 48.008 Source Cell ID IE

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16086 --- Comment #5 from Pascal Quantin --- Created attachment 17366 --> https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17366&action=edit S1AP HO required pcapng (In reply to excalibur47 from comment #2) > Created attachment 17364 [de

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16086] Old BSS to New BSS Info: Implementation of Decoding Function of 3GPP 48.008 Source Cell ID IE

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16086 --- Comment #4 from excalibur47 --- Created attachment 17365 --> https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17365&action=edit source_cell_id_not_decoded -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug change

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16086] Old BSS to New BSS Info: Implementation of Decoding Function of 3GPP 48.008 Source Cell ID IE

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16086 --- Comment #3 from excalibur47 --- Hi, Obviously I can produce the .pcap file but I think you gonna see the packets as UDP although my SCTP trace is open to view the packets. That's why I have shared the hex dumps. Here i am sharing a

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16086] Old BSS to New BSS Info: Implementation of Decoding Function of 3GPP 48.008 Source Cell ID IE

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16086 --- Comment #2 from excalibur47 --- Created attachment 17364 --> https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17364&action=edit Hex Dump of S1AP Application Protocol -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16087] Add WFA NAN Dissector

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16087 --- Comment #1 from Gerrit Code Review --- Change 34635 had a related patch set uploaded by Connor Newton: Wi-Fi NAN: Add support for Wi-Fi NAN protocol https://code.wireshark.org/review/34635 -- You are receiving this mail because: You

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16086] Old BSS to New BSS Info: Implementation of Decoding Function of 3GPP 48.008 Source Cell ID IE

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16086 --- Comment #1 from Anders Broman --- I don't know. I did not get this do decode as an S1AP message. Can you produce a .pcap file with the message? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16087] New: Add WFA NAN Dissector

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16087 Bug ID: 16087 Summary: Add WFA NAN Dissector Product: Wireshark Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: Enhancemen

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16086] Old BSS to New BSS Info: Implementation of Decoding Function of 3GPP 48.008 Source Cell ID IE

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16086 excalibur47 changed: What|Removed |Added Status|CONFIRMED |INCOMPLETE -- You are receiving th

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16083] Missing include causes builds to fail on specific include orders

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16083 --- Comment #3 from Anders Broman --- Perhaps expert.h should include proto.h before packet_info.h? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16083] Missing include causes builds to fail on specific include orders

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16083 --- Comment #2 from Jonatan Hatakeyama Zeidler --- I am not. But shouldn't frame_data.h have that include itself, if it relies on those types? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes._

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16086] Old BSS to New BSS Info: Implementation of Decoding Function of 3GPP 48.008 Source Cell ID IE

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16086 excalibur47 changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ademmcaki...@gmail.com -- You are