[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16201] Wireshark 3.1 on macOS Catalina freezes on trying to load capext

2019-11-11 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16201 Alexis La Goutte changed: What|Removed |Added CC||alexis.lagou...@gmail.com,

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16130] Display Filter Area: Dropdown Missing pkt_comment and tcp.options.sack_perm (likely others)

2019-11-11 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16130 --- Comment #5 from Gerrit Code Review --- Change 35060 had a related patch set uploaded by Pascal Quantin: Fix display of pino protocols in display filter dropdown https://code.wireshark.org/review/35060 -- You are receiving this mail

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16130] Display Filter Area: Dropdown Missing pkt_comment and tcp.options.sack_perm (likely others)

2019-11-11 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16130 --- Comment #4 from Gerrit Code Review --- Change 35059 had a related patch set uploaded by Pascal Quantin: Fix display of pino protocols in display filter dropdown https://code.wireshark.org/review/35059 -- You are receiving this mail

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16130] Display Filter Area: Dropdown Missing pkt_comment and tcp.options.sack_perm (likely others)

2019-11-11 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16130 --- Comment #3 from Gerrit Code Review --- Change 34778 merged by Pascal Quantin: Fix display of pino protocols in display filter dropdown https://code.wireshark.org/review/34778 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16198] The additional packages in the 3.0.6 dmg are "from an unknown developer"

2019-11-11 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16198 Jaap Keuter changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16201] Wireshark 3.1 on macOS Catalina freezes on trying to load capext

2019-11-11 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16201 --- Comment #7 from Guy Harris --- (In reply to matt from comment #6) > I attached the output of "sample" from one of the 100% processes when I > created the case. Please let me know if you need something different. Oy, so Wireshark has f

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16200] The "Remove Wireshark from the system path" package has "*Add* Wireshark to the system PATH" as its title

2019-11-11 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16200 --- Comment #4 from Gerrit Code Review --- Change 35057 merged by Guy Harris: Fix name of the "remove Wireshark from PATH" package. https://code.wireshark.org/review/35057 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16200] The "Remove Wireshark from the system path" package has "*Add* Wireshark to the system PATH" as its title

2019-11-11 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16200 --- Comment #3 from Gerrit Code Review --- Change 35057 had a related patch set uploaded by Guy Harris: Fix name of the "remove Wireshark from PATH" package. https://code.wireshark.org/review/35057 -- You are receiving this mail because

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16200] The "Remove Wireshark from the system path" package has "*Add* Wireshark to the system PATH" as its title

2019-11-11 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16200 --- Comment #2 from Gerrit Code Review --- Change 35056 merged by Guy Harris: Fix name of the "remove Wireshark from PATH" package. https://code.wireshark.org/review/35056 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16200] The "Remove Wireshark from the system path" package has "*Add* Wireshark to the system PATH" as its title

2019-11-11 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16200 --- Comment #1 from Gerrit Code Review --- Change 35056 had a related patch set uploaded by Guy Harris: Fix name of the "remove Wireshark from PATH" package. https://code.wireshark.org/review/35056 -- You are receiving this mail because

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16201] Wireshark 3.1 on macOS Catalina freezes on trying to load capext

2019-11-11 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16201 --- Comment #6 from m...@warnertechnology.com --- I attached the output of "sample" from one of the 100% processes when I created the case. Please let me know if you need something different. -- You are receiving this mail because: You ar

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16201] Wireshark 3.1 on macOS Catalina freezes on trying to load capext

2019-11-11 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16201 Guy Harris changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |INCOMPLETE Ever confirmed|0

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16198] The additional packages in the 3.0.6 dmg are "from an unknown developer"

2019-11-11 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16198 --- Comment #1 from Guy Harris --- Happens on Mojave as well. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.___ Sent via:Wireshark-bug

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16201] Wireshark 3.1 on macOS Catalina freezes on trying to load capext

2019-11-11 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16201 --- Comment #4 from Guy Harris --- Doesn't happen on my Mojave host machine; I'll try it on my Catalina VMware Fusion guest. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.___

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16201] Wireshark 3.1 on macOS Catalina freezes on trying to load capext

2019-11-11 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16201 --- Comment #3 from Guy Harris --- (In reply to matt from comment #1) > OS is macOS 10.15.1 (Catalina) Yes, bug 16199 asks for a "macOS 10.15" value; I've set it to "macOS" for now. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watchi

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16201] Wireshark 3.1 on macOS Catalina freezes on trying to load capext

2019-11-11 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16201 Guy Harris changed: What|Removed |Added Component|Capture file support|Qt UI |(libwiretap

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16201] Wireshark 3.1 on macOS Catalina freezes on trying to load capext

2019-11-11 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16201 m...@warnertechnology.com changed: What|Removed |Added OS|Mac OS X 10.4 |other -- You are rece

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16201] Wireshark 3.1 on macOS Catalina freezes on trying to load capext

2019-11-11 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16201 --- Comment #1 from m...@warnertechnology.com --- OS is macOS 10.15.1 (Catalina) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.___ Sent via

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16201] New: Wireshark 3.1 on macOS Catalina freezes on trying to load capext

2019-11-11 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16201 Bug ID: 16201 Summary: Wireshark 3.1 on macOS Catalina freezes on trying to load capext Product: Wireshark Version: unspecified Hardware: x86 OS: Mac

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16200] New: The "Remove Wireshark from the system path" package has "*Add* Wireshark to the system PATH" as its title

2019-11-11 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16200 Bug ID: 16200 Summary: The "Remove Wireshark from the system path" package has "*Add* Wireshark to the system PATH" as its title Product: Wireshark Version: 3.0.6 Ha

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16199] New: Bugzilla doesn't have "macOS 10.15" as a possible OS version.

2019-11-11 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16199 Bug ID: 16199 Summary: Bugzilla doesn't have "macOS 10.15" as a possible OS version. Product: Web sites Version: N/A Hardware: All OS: All

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16198] New: The additional packages in the 3.0.6 dmg are "from an unknown developer"

2019-11-11 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16198 Bug ID: 16198 Summary: The additional packages in the 3.0.6 dmg are "from an unknown developer" Product: Wireshark Version: 3.0.6 Hardware: x86-64 OS

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16192] tshark error when piping to "head"

2019-11-11 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16192 --- Comment #11 from Gerrit Code Review --- Change 35055 had a related patch set uploaded by Guy Harris: Don't report EPIPE errors writing out packet information. https://code.wireshark.org/review/35055 -- You are receiving this mail be

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16192] tshark error when piping to "head"

2019-11-11 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16192 --- Comment #10 from Gerrit Code Review --- Change 35054 had a related patch set uploaded by Guy Harris: Don't report EPIPE errors writing out packet information. https://code.wireshark.org/review/35054 -- You are receiving this mail be

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16192] tshark error when piping to "head"

2019-11-11 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16192 --- Comment #9 from Gerrit Code Review --- Change 35053 had a related patch set uploaded by Guy Harris: Don't report EPIPE errors writing out packet information. https://code.wireshark.org/review/35053 -- You are receiving this mail bec

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16192] tshark error when piping to "head"

2019-11-11 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16192 --- Comment #8 from Guy Harris --- (In reply to Chuck Craft from comment #7) > Googling around for Broken Pipe is quite the can of worms. > Not sure that I could foresee all cases where it's just ok to discard. One place is in show_print_

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16192] tshark error when piping to "head"

2019-11-11 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16192 --- Comment #7 from Chuck Craft --- Googling around for Broken Pipe is quite the can of worms. Not sure that I could foresee all cases where it's just ok to discard. What would be nice is if something like "-Q" could be extended to suppres

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16192] tshark error when piping to "head"

2019-11-11 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16192 --- Comment #6 from Guy Harris --- (In reply to João Valverde from comment #3) > > For what I can see the output is correct: head is cutting the input short > > and that's why tshark complains. But the output is correct. Can you > > elabor

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16192] tshark error when piping to "head"

2019-11-11 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16192 Guy Harris changed: What|Removed |Added Status|INCOMPLETE |CONFIRMED -- You are receiving this

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16192] tshark error when piping to "head"

2019-11-11 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16192 --- Comment #5 from Guy Harris --- Perhaps if tshark is writing to the standard output, and it gets EPIPE, it should just silently exit rather than reporting the EPIPE as a write error. For Windows, we should try to figure out *why* it's

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16192] tshark error when piping to "head"

2019-11-11 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16192 Guy Harris changed: What|Removed |Added Hardware|ARM |All -- You are receiving this mail

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16192] tshark error when piping to "head"

2019-11-11 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16192 Guy Harris changed: What|Removed |Added OS|Windows 10 |All Hardware|x86

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16181] Advanced filters/modifiers on columns

2019-11-11 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16181 --- Comment #2 from alex --- Thanks for looking into this, Dario. Use case: I'm analyzing Diameter packet cature. 1. Info column contains: cmd=Credit-Control Request(272) flags=RP-- appl=3GPP Gx(16777238) h2h=2010 e2e=41a2f7bc For my need

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16189] Please add a Resize Columns button to Endpoints, Conversations, and IO graphs

2019-11-11 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16189 Dario Lombardo changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lom...@gmail.com Ever confir

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16152] Flow sequence looks blurry while opening a call flow

2019-11-11 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16152 Dario Lombardo changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lom...@gmail.com Resolut

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16181] Advanced filters/modifiers on columns

2019-11-11 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16181 Dario Lombardo changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |INCOMPLETE CC|

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 15820] dumpcap doesn't support IPv6 addresses for TCP@ input

2019-11-11 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15820 João Valverde changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|IN_PROGR

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 15820] dumpcap doesn't support IPv6 addresses for TCP@ input

2019-11-11 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15820 --- Comment #10 from Gerrit Code Review --- Change 35030 merged by João Valverde: dumpcap: Add support for TCP@IPv6 socket captures https://code.wireshark.org/review/35030 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16192] tshark error when piping to "head"

2019-11-11 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16192 João Valverde changed: What|Removed |Added CC||joao.valverde@tecnico.ulisb

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16183] Online help displays window entitled "Wireshark Users Guide???TITLE???"

2019-11-11 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16183 Dario Lombardo changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lom...@gmail.com Resolut

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16191] "Finding local interfaces" takes long time on Windows

2019-11-11 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16191 Dario Lombardo changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lom...@gmail.com -- You are rec

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16192] tshark error when piping to "head"

2019-11-11 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16192 Dario Lombardo changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lom...@gmail.com Sta

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16196] Buildbot crash output: fuzz-2019-11-10-8100.pcap

2019-11-11 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16196 Pascal Quantin changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED CC|

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16196] Buildbot crash output: fuzz-2019-11-10-8100.pcap

2019-11-11 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16196 --- Comment #2 from Gerrit Code Review --- Change 35049 merged by Pascal Quantin: SNMP: fix out of bounds access to snmp_PDUs_vals array https://code.wireshark.org/review/35049 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching al

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16196] Buildbot crash output: fuzz-2019-11-10-8100.pcap

2019-11-11 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16196 --- Comment #1 from Gerrit Code Review --- Change 35049 had a related patch set uploaded by Pascal Quantin: SNMP: fix out of bounds access to snmp_PDUs_vals array https://code.wireshark.org/review/35049 -- You are receiving this mail be

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16197] IEEE 802.11: Support decrypting GCMP-256/CCMP-256 encrypted traffic

2019-11-11 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16197 Alexis La Goutte changed: What|Removed |Added CC||alexis.lagou...@gmail.com

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16197] New: IEEE 802.11: Support decrypting GCMP-256/CCMP-256 encrypted traffic

2019-11-11 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16197 Bug ID: 16197 Summary: IEEE 802.11: Support decrypting GCMP-256/CCMP-256 encrypted traffic Product: Wireshark Version: Git Hardware: All OS: All

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16178] "Create new file automatically after" not working with extcap

2019-11-11 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16178 Stig Bjørlykke changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|IN_PROG

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 9882] Data on SYN Not Reassembled Correctly in Packet Pane

2019-11-11 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9882 Uli Heilmeier changed: What|Removed |Added CC||u...@heilmeier.eu --- Comment #11