https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16265
Graham Bloice changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||graham.blo...@trihedral.com
--- C
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16265
--- Comment #6 from Pascal Quantin ---
For reference, the Npcap 0.9984 upgrade in master-3.0 is done in
https://code.wireshark.org/review/#/c/35379/
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.___
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16265
--- Comment #5 from Christopher Maynard ---
(In reply to Pascal Quantin from comment #2)
> If you are aware of security issues with the packages we bundle, please let
> us know and we will see what we can do. Otherwise we generally do not
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16266
Bug ID: 16266
Summary: DHCP Dissector for Option 97 (GUID) for PXE boot does
not properly present format
Product: Wireshark
Version: 3.0.6
Hardware: x86-64
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16265
--- Comment #4 from Pascal Quantin ---
(In reply to Christopher Maynard from comment #3)
> Well, it's more than just security, after all, while no new features are
> introduced into older Wireshark branches, Wirehsark bugs themselves are
>
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16265
--- Comment #3 from Christopher Maynard ---
(In reply to Pascal Quantin from comment #2)
> master-2.6 could deserve an update of USBPcap and Npcap, but I wonder why
> people would still use it anyway.
I don't know either (maybe they still
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16265
Pascal Quantin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pas...@wireshark.org
--- Comment
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16265
--- Comment #1 from Christopher Maynard ---
It also looks like the latest lz4 version is 1.9.2, so it looks like all
branches could use an update here. (https://github.com/lz4/lz4)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watchin
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16265
Bug ID: 16265
Summary: Some Windows packages need updating
Product: Wireshark
Version: 3.0.7
Hardware: All
OS: Windows
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16264
WH83 changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|INCOMPLETE |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16054
--- Comment #5 from Gerrit Code Review ---
Change 35376 had a related patch set uploaded by Tyman Sin:
SSH: Add dissection for unencrypted packets
https://code.wireshark.org/review/35376
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are w
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16264
--- Comment #12 from Pascal Quantin ---
That's correct you configure the ports used for TWAP decoding using 'Decode as'
dialog rather then the protocols preference.
You can click on the save button to make it persistent.
--
You are recei
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16264
--- Comment #11 from WH83 ---
Fair enough, I see it is likely customized by IXIA.
Now, in new Version 3 onwards, I assume payload has to be specifically decoded
and there is no way to identify the protocol automatically using (for exampl
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16264
--- Comment #10 from Pascal Quantin ---
Then it means you are using a custom Wireshark build: I checked out the 1.8.3
source code and confirmed there is no TWAMP-Test dissector.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching al
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16264
--- Comment #9 from WH83 ---
Created attachment 17509
--> https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17509&action=edit
V1.8.3 plugins
The tab is there for sure, but I do not see any TWAMP plugin
--
You are receiving this ma
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16264
--- Comment #8 from Pascal Quantin ---
Then it means that you are either having a custom version of Wireshark 1.8.3
adding TWAMP decoding, or you have installed a plug-in adding TWAMP decoding to
that official version.
What do you have in
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16264
--- Comment #7 from WH83 ---
All I did in 1.8.3 was to go to Edit -> Preferences -> Protocols and picked
TWAMP listed there. I believe decoding was done then based on UDP port number
then.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16264
--- Comment #6 from Pascal Quantin ---
Wireshark 1.8.3 source code does not have any TWAMP dissector built-in. Maybe
you are using a plugin?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.___
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16264
--- Comment #5 from WH83 ---
(In reply to WH83 from comment #4)
> Created attachment 17508 [details]
> V1.8.3 decode
The decode on version 1.8.3 seems to partially work
Version 1.8.3
Copyright 1998-2012 Gerald Com
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16264
--- Comment #4 from WH83 ---
Created attachment 17508
--> https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17508&action=edit
V1.8.3 decode
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.__
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16264
--- Comment #3 from Pascal Quantin ---
Hi,
could you clarify what you mean by did not work? When I apply the 'Decode as'
feature and select 'TWAAMP-Test', I get:
Frame 4: 1464 bytes on wire (11712 bits), 1464 bytes captured (11712 bits)
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16264
Pascal Quantin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Hardware|x86-64 |All
OS|Windows S
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16264
--- Comment #2 from WH83 ---
Hi there,
I have tried it on the data portion of the UDP payload and that did not work.
When moving one step up, i.e., decoding whole UDP payload it does work.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You ar
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16054
--- Comment #4 from Peter Wu ---
The intention was to develop a mechanism similar to the SSLKEYLOGFILE mechanism
for TLS implementations. Right now there is no implementation that writes the
ephemeral Diffie-Hellman secret (or the derived
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16264
Pascal Quantin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16261
Volodymyr Khomenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15021
--- Comment #7 from Gerrit Code Review ---
Change 35371 had a related patch set uploaded by Kenneth Soerensen:
ZigBee: Maintain APS extended counter for nodes
https://code.wireshark.org/review/35371
--
You are receiving this mail becaus
27 matches
Mail list logo
