https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10578
--- Comment #4 from boaz.brick...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Guy Harris from comment #3)
> So was this packet captured from a network, so that it should be valid, or
> is it somewhat fuzzed/randomized for use as part of the testing? Wiresh
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10578
Guy Harris changed:
What|Removed |Added
Hardware|x86-64 |All
OS|Windows 7
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10578
Gerrit Code Review changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10578
--- Comment #2 from Gerrit Code Review ---
Change 4818 merged by Michael Mann:
MIPv6: Mobility Option Mobile Node Link Layer Identifier Link-layer Identifier
field is read beyond the option data
https://code.wireshark.org/review/4818
--
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10578
--- Comment #1 from Gerrit Code Review ---
Change 4818 had a related patch set uploaded by Alexis La Goutte:
MIPv6: Mobility Option Mobile Node Link Layer Identifier Link-layer Identifier
field is read beyond the option data
https://code.
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10578
Alexis La Goutte changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||alexis.lagou...@gmail.com
--
