https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12067
Christopher Maynard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12067
--- Comment #19 from Christopher Maynard ---
Is there any update on this bug? Wireshark 2.0.x is end of life as of November
18, 2017 and Wireshark 2.2.x is end of life as of September 7, 2018. Does the
bug still exist even with the
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12067
Christopher Maynard changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.wireshark.org/
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12067
--- Comment #18 from Eric Blanding ---
I just found a workaround that may help point to the bug; the Packet Bytes pane
appears to be forcing the window wider to show a large number of individual
Bitstring tabs.
After
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12067
Eric Blanding changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12067
--- Comment #16 from Gerald Combs ---
(In reply to Matt Day from comment #15)
> (In reply to Gerald Combs from comment #12)
> > - It uses --with-qt and --with-qt4 instead of --with-qt5 and --with-qt to
> > install
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12067
--- Comment #15 from Matt Day ---
(In reply to Gerald Combs from comment #12)
> At the very least I think it'd be helpful if
> https://github.com/Homebrew/homebrew-core/blob/master/Formula/wireshark.rb
> were modified
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12067
--- Comment #14 from Matt Day ---
(In reply to Gerald Combs from comment #12)
> (In reply to Gerald Combs from comment #11)
> > (In reply to Matt Day from comment #8)
> > > It seems nobody has tested Wireshark+Qt5 much
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12067
--- Comment #13 from Matt Day ---
(In reply to Gerald Combs from comment #11)
> (In reply to Matt Day from comment #8)
> > It seems nobody has tested Wireshark+Qt5 much beyond successful compilation.
>
> Are you
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12067
--- Comment #12 from Gerald Combs ---
(In reply to Gerald Combs from comment #11)
> (In reply to Matt Day from comment #8)
> > It seems nobody has tested Wireshark+Qt5 much beyond successful compilation.
>
> Are you
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12067
--- Comment #11 from Gerald Combs ---
(In reply to Matt Day from comment #8)
> It seems nobody has tested Wireshark+Qt5 much beyond successful compilation.
Are you referring to the official packages from
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12067
Alexis La Goutte changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12067
--- Comment #9 from James Elliott ---
(In reply to Matt Day from comment #8)
> (In reply to James Elliott from comment #7)
> > I can report, however, that removing it and reinstalling it --with-qt-5 made
> >
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12067
--- Comment #8 from Matt Day ---
(In reply to James Elliott from comment #7)
> I can report, however, that removing it and reinstalling it --with-qt-5 made
> everything work fine, so I am going to remove my votes, and
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12067
--- Comment #7 from James Elliott ---
I feel your pain! Sadly I am buried in side-projects which are what are pulling
me into Wireshark in the first place, for reverse-engineering synchronization
protocols used by DJ
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12067
--- Comment #6 from Gerald Combs ---
(In reply to James Elliott from comment #4)
> Sadly, I install via homebrew, so I am limited to what they give me. Is that
> a bad idea?
Can you try reinstalling it with
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12067
--- Comment #5 from Gerald Combs ---
(In reply to James Elliott from comment #2)
> This deserves more attention than it seems to be getting from the
> description, because not only am I unable to resize the Wireshark
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12067
--- Comment #4 from James Elliott ---
Sadly, I install via homebrew, so I am limited to what they give me. Is that a
bad idea?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12067
--- Comment #3 from Gerald Combs ---
(In reply to Cannan from comment #0)
> Build Information:
> Version 2.0.1 (v2.0.1-0-g59ea380 from master-2.0)
>
> Copyright 1998-2015 Gerald Combs and
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12067
James Elliott changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|Low |Medium
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12067
Matt Day changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fja...@gmail.com
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12067
char changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||charh1...@gmail.com
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12067
Guy Harris changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|GTK+ UI |Qt UI
23 matches
Mail list logo