https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12067
Christopher Maynard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME
Stat
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12067
--- Comment #19 from Christopher Maynard ---
Is there any update on this bug? Wireshark 2.0.x is end of life as of November
18, 2017 and Wireshark 2.2.x is end of life as of September 7, 2018. Does the
bug still exist even with the lates
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12067
Christopher Maynard changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.wireshark.org/
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12067
--- Comment #18 from Eric Blanding ---
I just found a workaround that may help point to the bug; the Packet Bytes pane
appears to be forcing the window wider to show a large number of individual
Bitstring tabs.
After I uncheck View --> Pa
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12067
Eric Blanding changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ehb@icloud.com
--- Comment #1
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12067
--- Comment #16 from Gerald Combs ---
(In reply to Matt Day from comment #15)
> (In reply to Gerald Combs from comment #12)
> > - It uses --with-qt and --with-qt4 instead of --with-qt5 and --with-qt to
> > install with Qt5 and Qt4 respect
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12067
--- Comment #15 from Matt Day ---
(In reply to Gerald Combs from comment #12)
> At the very least I think it'd be helpful if
> https://github.com/Homebrew/homebrew-core/blob/master/Formula/wireshark.rb
> were modified such that
>
> - It i
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12067
--- Comment #14 from Matt Day ---
(In reply to Gerald Combs from comment #12)
> (In reply to Gerald Combs from comment #11)
> > (In reply to Matt Day from comment #8)
> > > It seems nobody has tested Wireshark+Qt5 much beyond successful
>
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12067
--- Comment #13 from Matt Day ---
(In reply to Gerald Combs from comment #11)
> (In reply to Matt Day from comment #8)
> > It seems nobody has tested Wireshark+Qt5 much beyond successful compilation.
>
> Are you referring to the official
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12067
--- Comment #12 from Gerald Combs ---
(In reply to Gerald Combs from comment #11)
> (In reply to Matt Day from comment #8)
> > It seems nobody has tested Wireshark+Qt5 much beyond successful compilation.
>
> Are you referring to the offic
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12067
--- Comment #11 from Gerald Combs ---
(In reply to Matt Day from comment #8)
> It seems nobody has tested Wireshark+Qt5 much beyond successful compilation.
Are you referring to the official packages from wireshark.org or the
homebrew-comp
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12067
Alexis La Goutte changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||alexis.lagou...@gmail.com
---
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12067
--- Comment #9 from James Elliott ---
(In reply to Matt Day from comment #8)
> (In reply to James Elliott from comment #7)
> > I can report, however, that removing it and reinstalling it --with-qt-5 made
> > everything work fine, so I am g
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12067
--- Comment #8 from Matt Day ---
(In reply to James Elliott from comment #7)
> I can report, however, that removing it and reinstalling it --with-qt-5 made
> everything work fine, so I am going to remove my votes, and just use the
> newer
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12067
--- Comment #7 from James Elliott ---
I feel your pain! Sadly I am buried in side-projects which are what are pulling
me into Wireshark in the first place, for reverse-engineering synchronization
protocols used by DJ equipment, so I very m
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12067
--- Comment #6 from Gerald Combs ---
(In reply to James Elliott from comment #4)
> Sadly, I install via homebrew, so I am limited to what they give me. Is that
> a bad idea?
Can you try reinstalling it with "--with-qt5"?
--
You are rece
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12067
--- Comment #5 from Gerald Combs ---
(In reply to James Elliott from comment #2)
> This deserves more attention than it seems to be getting from the
> description, because not only am I unable to resize the Wireshark windows,
> but they al
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12067
--- Comment #4 from James Elliott ---
Sadly, I install via homebrew, so I am limited to what they give me. Is that a
bad idea?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12067
--- Comment #3 from Gerald Combs ---
(In reply to Cannan from comment #0)
> Build Information:
> Version 2.0.1 (v2.0.1-0-g59ea380 from master-2.0)
>
> Copyright 1998-2015 Gerald Combs and contributors.
> License GPLv2+: GNU GPL version 2
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12067
James Elliott changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|Low |Medium
CC|
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12067
Matt Day changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fja...@gmail.com
--- Comment #1 from M
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12067
char changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||charh1...@gmail.com
--
You are receiving
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12067
Guy Harris changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|GTK+ UI |Qt UI
Hardware|x86
23 matches
Mail list logo
