Re: [Wireshark-dev] Could someone please update the FAQ or should we drop it completely?

2006-06-26 Thread Jeff Morriss
Ulf Lamping wrote: > Hi List! > > As I'm reading the current FAQ (and someone pointed that it should be > included in the help system), it seems to be very much outdated. > > There are a lot of entries which are obviously not a *frequently* asked > question today, e.g. 5.2: "This is a bug in

[Wireshark-dev] Could someone please update the FAQ or should we drop it completely?

2006-06-26 Thread Ulf Lamping
Hi List! As I'm reading the current FAQ (and someone pointed that it should be included in the help system), it seems to be very much outdated. There are a lot of entries which are obviously not a *frequently* asked question today, e.g. 5.2: "This is a bug in Ethereal 0.10.0a, which is fixed i

[Wireshark-dev] ...and a minor AMR patch

2006-06-26 Thread Neil Piercy
Just to add dissector name registration to the main IETF AMR dissector. Neil Index: packet-amr.c === --- packet-amr.c(revision 18574) +++ packet-amr.c(working copy) @@ -457,6 +457,7 @@ "Type of AMR encoding of

[Wireshark-dev] GSM A interface bug fix

2006-06-26 Thread Neil Piercy
Attached is a packet which used to crash wireshark due to passing a null pointer string to a format in proto_tree_add_uint_format due to an undissected Message Id. The patch avoids the crash for unknown messages, adds the Common Id message dissection which caused it, and also add dissector nam

Re: [Wireshark-dev] coverity issues==0

2006-06-26 Thread ronnie sahlberg
i imagine a few of the issues are such that they can only be reproduced on win32. i have myself a few captures crashing the win32 svn builds with windows version of sig segv but that works well under linux. (im trying to convince several individuals with access to a win32 build env to just load t

Re: [Wireshark-dev] coverity issues==0

2006-06-26 Thread Jaap Keuter
Hi All, Thanks everyone, for getting this done! Now if we only could clear out bugzilla.. ;) Thanx, Jaap On Mon, 26 Jun 2006, ronnie sahlberg wrote: > scan.coverity.com > > we are down at 0 issues now > > woohoo ___ Wireshark-dev mailing list [EM

[Wireshark-dev] coverity issues==0

2006-06-26 Thread ronnie sahlberg
scan.coverity.com we are down at 0 issues now woohoo ___ Wireshark-dev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev

Re: [Wireshark-dev] call other dissectors out of a dissector

2006-06-26 Thread Jaap Keuter
Hi, Have a look at plugins/h223/packet-srp.c for instance. It looks for dissector handles, creates a subset of the TVB and passes that to the other dissector. How simple is that :) Danke, Jaap On Mon, 26 Jun 2006, Almer Hell wrote: > Hello > > I'm working on a dissector(-plugin) and now finally

[Wireshark-dev] call other dissectors out of a dissector

2006-06-26 Thread Almer Hell
Hello I'm working on a dissector(-plugin) and now finally got to the payload. The protocol is testy, made by the company I'm intern on. (German: "Praktikant". Is a person who want to know about some job specifics and "works" for (usual) no money for a couple weeks/months in a company.) In the pay