Re: [Wireshark-dev] Anyone of the developers going to support Win98 (and alike) any further? Otherwise we should officially drop support of it!

2006-08-29 Thread ronnie sahlberg
If no one else wants to support gtk1 I can do that. As long as no one actively tries to break gtk1 it shouldnt be too difficult. Or at least ill try to keep it compileable and workable until it is too much work and ill have to switch to gtk2. I.e. leaving gtk1 as unsupported and only

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Anyone of the developers going to support Win98 (and alike) any further? Otherwise we should officially drop support of it!

2006-08-29 Thread Thomas Steffen
On 8/29/06, Stephen Fisher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I installed Wireshark/Ethereal from Darwin Ports so it took care of the dependencies, then I laid out my source code to develop with. Exactly. If you don't like to mess with dependencies yourself, use a tool that covers them. The obvious

Re: [Wireshark-dev] newbie building on cygwin, windows... can't find pcap

2006-08-29 Thread Andrew Schweitzer
Graeme Lunt wrote: On 8/28/06, Andrew Schweitzer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Does anyone out there use Cygwin only for windows development? I did all my development under cygwin only for the last 12 months. However recently a number of patches have broken it and I was spending too much

[Wireshark-dev] A question about ASN.1 encoding in wireshark

2006-08-29 Thread chris.guo
Title: A question about ASN.1 encoding in wireshark Hi All, I have a question about ASN.1 decoding in wirshark, hope can get someone's help. I have my own defined ASN.1 messages, these messages are decoded with BER, the messages transfer based on TCP/IP, wireshark can capture the

[Wireshark-dev] A question about ASN.1 encoding in wireshark

2006-08-29 Thread Chris
Hi All, I have a question about ASN.1 decoding in wirshark, hope can get someone's help. I have my own defined ASN.1 messages, these messages are decoded with BER, the messages transfer based on TCP/IP, wireshark can capture the messages, and decode the message, but can not display the field