Re: [Wireshark-dev] Related Information (again)

2006-09-24 Thread Graeme Lunt
Ulf, Thanks for the comments. > > It adds a new menu item "Related Information" and provides a generic > > mechanism to register related information for: > > * a specific hf_index - register_related_hfid_callback() > > * a range of hf_indexes (e.g. "owned" by a given dissector) - > > register_rel

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Related Information (again)

2006-09-24 Thread Graeme Lunt
Ulf, > >> I guess this will present the field in the protocol > >> details tree as a link (similar to "go to frame" fields) > >> to open it in a browser? Sounds > >> reasonable. > >> > > > > It doesn't do this at the moment - but it easily could. > > > > Hmmm, thinking of it ag

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Related Information (again)

2006-09-24 Thread ronnie sahlberg
On 9/23/06, Ulf Lamping <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Graeme Lunt wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Attached is a new version of the related information functionality I had > > previously submitted (back in May). > > I thought I would ask for comments before checking it in this time! 8^) > > > :-) > > It adds

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Related Information (again)

2006-09-24 Thread Ulf Lamping
Graeme Lunt wrote: > Well, it actually doesn't need a new type (FT_URL) as the FI_URL is > sufficient. > Unsure. Having a string tagged as an URL *might* be awkward, however didn't thought about it too much. It might be better to see what other developers think. > See the attached patch (whic

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Fwd: And again BER errors while decoding H248packets

2006-09-24 Thread Anders Broman
Hi, I have checked in a fix please verify it with your traces. Best regards Anders -Ursprungligt meddelande- Från: Oleg Kostenko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Skickat: den 20 september 2006 10:41 Till: Anders Broman; wireshark-dev@wireshark.org Ämne: Re[2]: Fwd: And again BER errors while de

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Query regarding GTP protocol

2006-09-24 Thread prashanth joshi
Hi, I need to parse GTP' packet consisting in its message field the GCDR and then SRecord. Srecord is the record defined by us. Now obviously I need to add code to the ethereal to do this. I plan to check for the type fields in the pay load of the packet myself and then call the corresponding de

[Wireshark-dev] OS X libjpeg conflict - not a wireshark problem?

2006-09-24 Thread Stephen Fisher
There is a problem on OS X between the system's jpeg library and one installed by DarwinPorts in /opt when running Wireshark from the build directory. I wanted to confirm that this is not a Wireshark problem we can fix before I add it to the FAQ... To fix, I change the "wireshark" script from:

Re: [Wireshark-dev] OS X libjpeg conflict - not a wireshark problem?

2006-09-24 Thread Stephen Fisher
On Sun, Sep 24, 2006 at 03:18:19PM -0700, Stephen Fisher wrote: > There is a problem on OS X between the system's jpeg library and one > installed by DarwinPorts in /opt when running Wireshark from the build > directory. The symptom is this error: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/local/src/wireshark>./w

[Wireshark-dev] tcp_dissect_pdus and BitTorrent dissector

2006-09-24 Thread John R.
Using tcp_dissect_pdus I have been having issues with improper dissection of application level protocol PDUs with my proprietary protocol. So that this problem can be efficiently debugged, I have reproduced the issue against a BitTorrent peer. Problem: tcp_dissect_pdus is used by many dissectors

Re: [Wireshark-dev] What's the state of the Meta/LUA plugins? How to continue?

2006-09-24 Thread LEGO
Being the C++ generated lua interface sluggish (at least twice slower) I decided that I'll keep working on the old one. Here's what I'll do: For now I checked in a slightly modified version into epan/ which by now only *nix build uses (that's why I haven't deleted the plugin yet). I'll drop ssu

[Wireshark-dev] Could someone with OS X check ...

2006-09-24 Thread Stephen Fisher
Could someone with OS X check if they have the same problem as I do. When I go into the View -> Color Filters -> Edit Color Filter, the text color is always black even when the foreground is set to another color. This makes text on black backgrounds invisible. I'm not experiencing this probl

Re: [Wireshark-dev] tcp_dissect_pdus and BitTorrent dissector

2006-09-24 Thread John R. Hogerhuis
I have filed this report in bugzilla as http://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1124 Thanks, -- John. ___ Wireshark-dev mailing list Wireshark-dev@wireshark.org http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev