Re: [Wireshark-dev] Questions about dev

2006-11-07 Thread Kukosa, Tomas
Hello, I use a little bit differen solution for a similar problem. Sometimes I need to dissect proprietray protocols from tracesfiles not supported by Wireshark. I use following way: 1) convert trace file to pcap format with linktype DLT_USERx (x=0-15) simple conversion tool can be written in P

[Wireshark-dev] [Updated patch] New feature: highlight results of find packet

2006-11-07 Thread Stephen Fisher
On Tue, Nov 07, 2006 at 05:25:48PM -0800, Stephen Fisher wrote: > Attached is a patch that enables Wireshark to highlight in the tree > and hex display the results of a search. This works for both hex and > string searches in the Find Packet window. This is a feature I've > wanted forever an

[Wireshark-dev] New feature: highlight results of find packet

2006-11-07 Thread Stephen Fisher
Attached is a patch that enables Wireshark to highlight in the tree and hex display the results of a search. This works for both hex and string searches in the Find Packet window. This is a feature I've wanted forever and Ulf opened it as a feature request in bug 776 :). Steve Index: gtk/ma

[Wireshark-dev] Segmentation fault at file_read

2006-11-07 Thread Neha Chahal
Hi I am trying to read 4 bytes from my capture file. The code looks like this guint32 id; bytes_read = file_read(&id, 1, 4, wth->fh) And this dumps core. If i change 1 to 4, it works but then it will read 16 bytes which i dont want. Does anybody have any suggestions. Thank you for your help. -

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Release 00.99.4 missing file?

2006-11-07 Thread Bill Florac
Thanks, clean_setup has fixed that GTK2 issue (and GTK2 works correctly on PCs with dual monitors!) Bill -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Anders Broman Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2006 4:10 PM To: 'Developer support list for Wireshark' Su

[Wireshark-dev] Enabling threads

2006-11-07 Thread Gerald Combs
Is there any reason threads shouldn't be enabled by default? It would make implementing the version checking and windows update features in the roadmap a bit easier and cleaner. ___ Wireshark-dev mailing list Wireshark-dev@wireshark.org http://www.wiresh

Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 1179] cmake build integration + dbus + bunch of memleak fixes

2006-11-07 Thread Gerald Combs
Joerg Mayer wrote: > On Tue, Nov 07, 2006 at 09:26:50AM +, ronnie sahlberg wrote: >> As someone that has actually studied the feasibility of making >> wireshark multithreaded and what would be required >> >> "... Written with tons of globals variables, non thread safe, ..." > > [Good reasons a

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Release 00.99.4 missing file?

2006-11-07 Thread Anders Broman
-Ursprungligt meddelande- Från: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] För Bill Florac Skickat: den 7 november 2006 23:01 Till: Developer support list for Wireshark Ämne: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Release 00.99.4 missing file? : >Since this is the first time I tried to build since 0.99.3

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Release 00.99.4 missing file?

2006-11-07 Thread Bill Florac
FYI, I don't seem to have major problems with the CYGWIN version of Python. I can build the latest using... cygwinpython 2.4.3 cygwinbash 3.1.17(9) microsoft nmake 6.0.0.8167.0 I did have to convert the following files to UNIX format. I expect it has something to do with the version

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Questions about dev

2006-11-07 Thread Neha Chahal
On 11/7/06, Guy Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Neha Chahal wrote: > > > The format of the file is binary > > "Binary" isn't a format for a packet capture; there are several capture > file formats, all of which are binary, but they're not all the same. > What *specific* binary format is it? > >

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Questions about dev

2006-11-07 Thread Guy Harris
Neha Chahal wrote: > The format of the file is binary "Binary" isn't a format for a packet capture; there are several capture file formats, all of which are binary, but they're not all the same. What *specific* binary format is it? Is this some standard format (libpcap format as used by tcpdu

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Questions about dev

2006-11-07 Thread Neha Chahal
On 11/7/06, Guy Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Neha Chahal wrote: > > > I am very new to the ethereal source code. I want to add a dissector > > that understands my protocol –" my_proto". > > > > Problem statement: > > > > I have a binary file my_proto_dump.log. This file has packets received

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Questions about dev

2006-11-07 Thread Guy Harris
Neha Chahal wrote: > I am very new to the ethereal source code. I want to add a dissector > that understands my protocol –" my_proto". > > Problem statement: > > I have a binary file my_proto_dump.log. This file has packets received > by my application. What format is that file in? > I w

[Wireshark-dev] "Save as..." bug

2006-11-07 Thread Andrew Feren
Noticed this yesterday. Figured I'd mention it to see if anyone has an easy fix. Select File -> Save As... Enter a file name that exists Press OK wireshark give a warning that the file exists. Select Cancel Select File -> Save As... No window opens Wireshark Version == latest subvers

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Release 00.99.4 missing file?

2006-11-07 Thread Ulf Lamping
> I let cygwin do its default thing, plus adding in the additional > downloads required for the Wireshark documentation. Then I went back to > an earlier version of Bash. I only installed cygwin to get Wireshark > working so it should be standard. > > The file system is NTFS. > Hi! I have thes

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Release 00.99.4 missing file?

2006-11-07 Thread Cook, Timothy
This isn't a new issue! I haven't been able to use the CYGWIN version of Python to build WS, since I start with WS around March this year. I have install the Win32 native version of Python (v2.3), no problem. -Tim > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECT

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Release 00.99.4 missing file?

2006-11-07 Thread Robert Trybis
I let cygwin do its default thing, plus adding in the additional downloads required for the Wireshark documentation. Then I went back to an earlier version of Bash. I only installed cygwin to get Wireshark working so it should be standard. The file system is NTFS. Regards RT -Original Messag

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Release 00.99.4 missing file?

2006-11-07 Thread Robert Trybis
I decide trying to continue by hand would be difficult so I commented python out in config.nmake This too failed though, results below; radius_dict.c radius_dict.l(77) : warning C4005: 'OUT' : macro redefinition C:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio\VC98\include\rpcdce.h(23) : see previ

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Release 00.99.4 missing file?

2006-11-07 Thread Andrew.Martin
I have had this error, or at least something similar. It was when I was developing a disector. For whatever reason, I had to have a fresh clean plugin.c file in the folder and delete the .obj file everytime. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Release 00.99.4 missing file?

2006-11-07 Thread Peter Johansson
Jaap Keuter wrote: > Hi, > > This stuff is wierd. First cygpath that acts up, now it's env that can't > find python from /usr/bin/ It seems that path isn't working. > Do you have a nondefault cygwin installation? Maybe it's the filesystem > type, what type is it? > > Thanx, > Jaap > > > > _

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Release 00.99.4 missing file?

2006-11-07 Thread Jaap Keuter
Hi, This stuff is wierd. First cygpath that acts up, now it's env that can't find python from /usr/bin/ It seems that path isn't working. Do you have a nondefault cygwin installation? Maybe it's the filesystem type, what type is it? Thanx, Jaap ___ W

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Release 00.99.4 missing file?

2006-11-07 Thread Robert Trybis
Missing bit; Microsoft (R) Program Maintenance Utility Version 6.00.9782.0 Copyright (C) Microsoft Corp 1988-1998. All rights reserved. 'dfilter.lib' is up-to-date cd .. cd wslua NMAKE / -f Makefile.nmake Microsoft (R) Program Maintenance Utility Ver

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Release 00.99.4 missing file?

2006-11-07 Thread Robert Trybis
Running python by hand produces packet-ncp222.c (thanks Graham), but the build then fails later when python runs again. I have given the latter part of the build output below. From earlier problems I know some of the source files I have downloaded don't have Unix style end-of-line, I am using an e

[Wireshark-dev] Questions about dev

2006-11-07 Thread Neha Chahal
Hi , I am very new to the ethereal source code. I want to add a dissector that understands my protocol –" my_proto". Problem statement: I have a binary file my_proto_dump.log. This file has packets received by my application. I want ethereal to read from a binary file packets in my_proto

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Release 00.99.4 missing file?

2006-11-07 Thread Graham Bloice
Robert Trybis wrote: > env python produces; > > Python 2.4.3 (#1, May 18 2006, 07:40:45) > [GCC 3.3.3 (cygwin special)] on cygwin > Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "License" for more information. > Hmmm, same as mine. Something has gone wrong in the nmake environment when attempting to i

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Release 00.99.4 missing file?

2006-11-07 Thread Robert Trybis
env python produces; Python 2.4.3 (#1, May 18 2006, 07:40:45) [GCC 3.3.3 (cygwin special)] on cygwin Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "License" for more information. >>> Regards RT -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Graham Bloice Sent:

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Release 00.99.4 missing file?

2006-11-07 Thread Graham Bloice
Robert Trybis wrote: > Under XP I have got as far as trying to build Wireshark 00.99.4. > > Unfortunately the build fails because of “env: python: No such file or > directory” when it gets to building dissectors. > > I was a bit surprised by this as I got a clean copy of the release and I > am ce

[Wireshark-dev] Release 00.99.4 missing file?

2006-11-07 Thread Robert Trybis
Under XP I have got as far as trying to build Wireshark 00.99.4. Unfortunately the build fails because of “env: python: No such file or directory” when it gets to building dissectors. I was a bit surprised by this as I got a clean copy of the release and I am certain I have not deleted an

Re: [Wireshark-dev] cygpath: cannot create short name of C:\wireshark-win32-libs

2006-11-07 Thread Jaap Keuter
Hi, Yeah, that is what he said. Thing is that it shouldn't happen. What's cygpaths problem? Thanx, Jaap On Tue, 7 Nov 2006, LEGO wrote: > You can create an emty dir on c:\ and rename it in config.nmake:32 > WIRESHARK_LIBS=C:\wireshark-win32-libs > > On 11/7/06, Robert Trybis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: [Wireshark-dev] cygpath: cannot create short name of C:\wireshark-win32-libs

2006-11-07 Thread LEGO
You can create an emty dir on c:\ and rename it in config.nmake:32 WIRESHARK_LIBS=C:\wireshark-win32-libs On 11/7/06, Robert Trybis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > On Windows XP when trying to run the Automated library dowload > > the command > > nmake -f Makefile.nmake setup > > fails if the

[Wireshark-dev] cygpath: cannot create short name of C:\wireshark-win32-libs

2006-11-07 Thread Robert Trybis
On Windows XP when trying to run the Automated library dowload the command nmake -f Makefile.nmake setup fails if the directory C:\wireshark-win32-libs does not exist.   Easily solved by creating the directory before attempting the download. Output showing the problem given below.  

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Replace ntohl() with g_ntohl() -> automated check?

2006-11-07 Thread LEGO
what about #defining them so they trigger an error? On 11/7/06, Ulf Lamping <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Jaap Keuter wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Checked in. > > > > Thanx, > > Jaap > > > > > > On Mon, 6 Nov 2006, Albert Chin wrote: > > > > > >> Patch attached to convert usage of ntohl() -> g_ntohl(). O

Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Fwd: Re: help-help! Question about roundtrip delay?]

2006-11-07 Thread Andreina Toro
Hi Mr. Martin, I have a question about the bug in wireshark you were able to identify. Is there a way to download the lines in order tu run Wireshark without this problem?, or do I have to change more than simple lines in the source code?, or do I have to wait until the developers create a new full

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Verify installed tools failing

2006-11-07 Thread Robert Trybis
Looks good. The version of Bash I HAD was version 3.1.17(9) this was downloaded from Cygwin as 3.1-9 (Cygwin has another version 3.2.3-5 which I did not try). Followinf your emails I downloaded an earlier version 3.1.17(6) from Cygwin as 3.1-6 and this has worked. Thanks for the help it looks lik

Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 1179] cmake build integration + dbus + bunch of memleak fixes

2006-11-07 Thread ronnie sahlberg
I think the most interesting useage would be to do dissection of packets for very large traces in paralell across all the cores greatly speeding up the dissection/filtering of packets. If doing this, it would as a sideeffect also make your useage example : multiple captures dissected/operated on i

Re: [Wireshark-dev] net-snmp modules missing?

2006-11-07 Thread Radek Vokál
Thomas Anders wrote: > Radek Vokál wrote: >> Wireshark is linked against libnetsnmp >> libnetsnmp.so.10 => /usr/lib/libnetsnmp.so.10 >> >> which is present on my desktop but I see it complaining for >> >> Cannot find module (IP-MIB): At line 0 in (none) >> Cannot find module (IF-MIB): At line 0 in

Re: [Wireshark-dev] net-snmp modules missing?

2006-11-07 Thread Radek Vokál
Guy Harris wrote: > Ulf Lamping wrote: > >> That was a bug in copying the Win32 debug environment together. The mib >> files must go to "snmp\mibs", not simply "mibs" > > Given Radek's e-mail address (and job title), I suspect he's not running > Windows, so that's probably not the cause of the

Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 1179] cmake build integration + dbus + bunch of memleak fixes

2006-11-07 Thread Joerg Mayer
On Tue, Nov 07, 2006 at 09:26:50AM +, ronnie sahlberg wrote: > As someone that has actually studied the feasibility of making > wireshark multithreaded and what would be required > > "... Written with tons of globals variables, non thread safe, ..." [Good reasons about the real problems of mu

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Use of anonymous union in epan/dissectors/packet-usb.[ch]

2006-11-07 Thread ronnie sahlberg
Yes. Currently get descriptor is the only real command from core usb that is implemented. Other commands, when implemented, will need to pass other kinds of data between request and responses. On 11/7/06, Guy Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ronnie sahlberg wrote: > > checked in > > So why is

[Wireshark-dev] Patch for ACN

2006-11-07 Thread Bill Florac
Here is a patch for the ACN dissector. It fixes a bug in acn_add_expiry() and cleans up some cosmetic things. Bill Florac Senior Technical Product Specialist Electronic Theatre Controls, Inc 3031 Pleasant View Rd Middleton, WI 53562 608-831-4116 (corp. phone) acn.patch Description: acn.patch

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Use of gcrypt and gnutls in version_info.c

2006-11-07 Thread Jaap Keuter
On Tue, 7 Nov 2006, Guy Harris wrote: > Jaap Keuter wrote: > > > He must have missed the memo that we're all gone working on Wireshark. ;) > > So when do we rename the "epan" directory "wpan"? :-) > When hell freezes over! Oh wait, that already happend when Debian Sarge was released >:-> ___

Re: [Wireshark-dev] net-snmp modules missing?

2006-11-07 Thread Guy Harris
Ulf Lamping wrote: > That was a bug in copying the Win32 debug environment together. The mib > files must go to "snmp\mibs", not simply "mibs" Given Radek's e-mail address (and job title), I suspect he's not running Windows, so that's probably not the cause of the problem he's seeing. :-) _

Re: [Wireshark-dev] ACN Source code

2006-11-07 Thread Bill Florac
Thanks for cleaning these up.. I should have caught the bitfields... I'm not used to all the cross-platform problems (but I'm learning... :) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Guy Harris Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2006 3:09 AM To: Developer s

Re: [Wireshark-dev] net-snmp modules missing?

2006-11-07 Thread Thomas Anders
Radek Vokál wrote: > Wireshark is linked against libnetsnmp > libnetsnmp.so.10 => /usr/lib/libnetsnmp.so.10 > > which is present on my desktop but I see it complaining for > > Cannot find module (IP-MIB): At line 0 in (none) > Cannot find module (IF-MIB): At line 0 in (none) > Cannot find module

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Use of anonymous union in epan/dissectors/packet-usb.[ch]

2006-11-07 Thread Guy Harris
ronnie sahlberg wrote: > checked in So why is there a union with only one member? Is that for future expansion? ___ Wireshark-dev mailing list Wireshark-dev@wireshark.org http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev

Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-commits] rev 19777: /trunk/ /trunk/: capture-pcap-util.c capture_loop.c capture_opts.c dumpcap.c

2006-11-07 Thread Guy Harris
Ulf Lamping wrote: > What are the reasons of the following changes in capture_loop.c: I've backed those out, for the reasons noted; the right way to fix null-pointer dereferences in routines not defined to accept null pointers is not to add checks to those routines, it's to avoid passing those

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Use of gcrypt and gnutls in version_info.c

2006-11-07 Thread Guy Harris
Jaap Keuter wrote: > He must have missed the memo that we're all gone working on Wireshark. ;) So when do we rename the "epan" directory "wpan"? :-) ___ Wireshark-dev mailing list Wireshark-dev@wireshark.org http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wir

Re: [Wireshark-dev] net-snmp modules missing?

2006-11-07 Thread Ulf Lamping
Joerg Mayer wrote: > On Tue, Nov 07, 2006 at 09:20:48AM +0100, Radek Vokál wrote: > >> which is present on my desktop but I see it complaining for >> >> Cannot find module (IP-MIB): At line 0 in (none) >> Cannot find module (IF-MIB): At line 0 in (none) >> Cannot find module (TCP-MIB): At line 0

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Use of gcrypt and gnutls in version_info.c

2006-11-07 Thread Jaap Keuter
Hi list, He must have missed the memo that we're all gone working on Wireshark. ;) Thanx, Jaap On Tue, 7 Nov 2006, Guy Harris wrote: > Joerg Mayer wrote: > > > Hmm, the fix is correct, but if we need to links dumpcap with gnutls > > just to handle the version stuff, then something more fundamen

Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 1179] cmake build integration + dbus + bunch of memleak fixes

2006-11-07 Thread ronnie sahlberg
As someone that has actually studied the feasibility of making wireshark multithreaded and what would be required "... Written with tons of globals variables, non thread safe, ..." There are some global variables in the bulk of the codebase, i.e. the dissectors. There is actually not that many o

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Warnings in gtkvumeter.c

2006-11-07 Thread Ulf Lamping
Joerg Mayer wrote: > gtkvumeter.c:946: warning: comparison of unsigned expression < 0 is > always false > gtkvumeter.c:1144: warning: comparison of unsigned expression < 0 is > always false > > I'll have a look probably tomorrow ... Regards, ULFL ___

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Use of gcrypt and gnutls in version_info.c

2006-11-07 Thread Guy Harris
Joerg Mayer wrote: > Hmm, the fix is correct, but if we need to links dumpcap with gnutls > just to handle the version stuff, then something more fundamental is > broken with our version stuff. There should be a better solution to > this problem. get_epan_compiled_version_info() should probably b

[Wireshark-dev] Warnings in gtkvumeter.c

2006-11-07 Thread Joerg Mayer
gtkvumeter.c:946: warning: comparison of unsigned expression < 0 is always false gtkvumeter.c:1144: warning: comparison of unsigned expression < 0 is always false -- Joerg Mayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> We are stuck with technology when what we really want is

Re: [Wireshark-dev] ACN Source code

2006-11-07 Thread ronnie sahlberg
I just tried to check in an alkmost identical patch which failed. Thanks guy On 11/7/06, Guy Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Joerg Mayer wrote: > > > Here is the list of warnings it creates on my system: > > I've checked in some changes that should fix most, if not all, of them. > > In par

Re: [Wireshark-dev] ACN Source code

2006-11-07 Thread Guy Harris
Joerg Mayer wrote: > Here is the list of warnings it creates on my system: I've checked in some changes that should fix most, if not all, of them. In particular: > packet-acn.h:168: warning: type of bit-field 'dummy' is a GCC extension > packet-acn.h:169: warning: type of bit-field 'D' is a GCC

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Use of gcrypt and gnutls in version_info.c

2006-11-07 Thread Ulf Lamping
Joerg Mayer wrote: > Hmm, the fix is correct, but if we need to links dumpcap with gnutls > just to handle the version stuff, then something more fundamental is > broken with our version stuff. There should be a better solution to > this problem. > FULL ACK! Regards, ULFL _

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Replace ntohl() with g_ntohl() -> automated check?

2006-11-07 Thread Ulf Lamping
Jaap Keuter wrote: > Hi, > > Checked in. > > Thanx, > Jaap > > > On Mon, 6 Nov 2006, Albert Chin wrote: > > >> Patch attached to convert usage of ntohl() -> g_ntohl(). On HP-UX, >> ntohl() isn't available unless you -D_XOPEN_SOURCE_EXTENDED but there >> are other uses of g_ntohl(). >> >> -- >> a

Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 1179] cma ke build integration + dbus + bunch of memleak fixes

2006-11-07 Thread frederic heem
On Monday 06 November 2006 11:16 pm, Ulf Lamping wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Please do not confuse the bug that I may have introduced, and the > > wireshark/glib bugs. > > THERE ARE NO WIRESHARK BUGS THAT YOU'VE FIXED (beside some very > unimportant memory leaks)!!! > and some uninitializ

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Use of gcrypt and gnutls in version_info.c

2006-11-07 Thread Joerg Mayer
On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 09:20:22PM -0600, Albert Chin wrote: > version_info.c has: > #ifdef HAVE_LIBGCRYPT > #include > #endif /* HAVE_LIBGCRYPT */ > > #ifdef HAVE_LIBGNUTLS > #include > #endif /* HAVE_LIBGNUTLS */ > > However, Makefile.am doesn't include the necessary CPPFLAGS/LDFL

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Use of anonymous union in epan/dissectors/packet-usb.[ch]

2006-11-07 Thread ronnie sahlberg
checked in thanks (and sorry for that since its my code and i should have known better) On 11/7/06, Albert Chin <> wrote: > The Solaris C compiler, among others, do not allow anonymous unions. > Patch attached. > > -- > albert chin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) > >

Re: [Wireshark-dev] net-snmp modules missing?

2006-11-07 Thread Joerg Mayer
On Tue, Nov 07, 2006 at 09:20:48AM +0100, Radek Vokál wrote: > which is present on my desktop but I see it complaining for > > Cannot find module (IP-MIB): At line 0 in (none) > Cannot find module (IF-MIB): At line 0 in (none) > Cannot find module (TCP-MIB): At line 0 in (none) > Cannot find modul

Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-commits] rev 19777: /trunk/ /trunk/: capture-pcap-util.c capture_loop.c capture_opts.c dumpcap.c

2006-11-07 Thread Joerg Mayer
On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 11:30:12PM +0100, Ulf Lamping wrote: > These places look bogus and should be reverted, unless there are good > reasons that I don't see ... You know the code much better than I do, so feel free to revert that stuff! Basically the only thing I tried to make sure was that th

[Wireshark-dev] net-snmp modules missing?

2006-11-07 Thread Radek Vokál
Wireshark is linked against libnetsnmp libnetsnmp.so.10 => /usr/lib/libnetsnmp.so.10 which is present on my desktop but I see it complaining for Cannot find module (IP-MIB): At line 0 in (none) Cannot find module (IF-MIB): At line 0 in (none) Cannot find module (TCP-MIB): At line 0 in (none)

Re: [Wireshark-dev] ACN Source code

2006-11-07 Thread Joerg Mayer
On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 08:15:01PM +, ronnie sahlberg wrote: > checked in Here is the list of warnings it creates on my system: In file included from packet-acn.c:56: packet-acn.h:38:1: warning: C++ style comments are not allowed in ISO C90 packet-acn.h:38:1: warning: (this will be reported o