Re: [Wireshark-dev] Roofnet Dissector

2006-12-11 Thread Jaap Keuter
Hi, Time to whipe together a Wiki page on this Thanx, Jaap On Mon, 11 Dec 2006, Nicola Arnoldi wrote: > Hello everybody. > I send you as an attachment a sample capture file of a TCP session > running over a roofnet wireless mesh. > (zipped version of a tcpdump capture file obtained with wir

[Wireshark-dev] Problems building from recent tarball

2006-12-11 Thread Anders Broman \(AL/EAB\)
Hi, The files in the directory airpdcap/ is bissing from the source tarball as well as /trunk/plugins/h223 moduleinfo.nmake and plugin.rc.in BR Anders ___ Wireshark-dev mailing list Wireshark-dev@wireshark.org http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/lis

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Roofnet Dissector

2006-12-11 Thread Nicola Arnoldi
Excuse me. Maybe my question is a bit ridiculous... I am quite a newbie, so don't blame me. After having applied the patch you provided me, how do I compile wireshark from the sources I downloaded via SVN? Thanks Nicola ___ Wireshark-dev mailing list Wi

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Problems building from recent tarball

2006-12-11 Thread Jaap Keuter
Hi, That plugin stuff is still being worked on. It will be added the the distribution target when it is completed. Thanx, Jaap On Mon, 11 Dec 2006, Anders Broman (AL/EAB) wrote: > Hi, > The files in the directory airpdcap/ > is bissing from the source tarball > as well as > /trunk/plugins/h2

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Roofnet Dissector

2006-12-11 Thread Jaap Keuter
Hi, Please have a look in the Developer Manual found on the website. It contains all you want to know about building Wireshark. Thanx, Jaap On Mon, 11 Dec 2006, Nicola Arnoldi wrote: > Excuse me. > Maybe my question is a bit ridiculous... > I am quite a newbie, so don't blame me. > After having

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Roofnet Dissector

2006-12-11 Thread Sebastien Tandel
./autogen.sh ./configure options => ./configure --help or the manual on the website make make install (optional) Nicola Arnoldi wrote: > Excuse me. > Maybe my question is a bit ridiculous... > I am quite a newbie, so don't blame me. > After having applied the patch you provided me, how do I

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Roofnet Dissector

2006-12-11 Thread Nicola Arnoldi
Ok guys. I am a newbie of wireshark, but not of UN*X in general... I have already tried those... But I encounter several errors. I have libtool, automake, autoconf installed and updated running on an Ubuntu linux 6.10. -- aclocal -I ./ac

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Roofnet Dissector

2006-12-11 Thread Sebastien Tandel
I already had problems with others software when using automake ... it is difficult to have all the different versions working for one project on my installation, I have automake 1.6.3 but I know that using automake 1.9 also generates some messages ... and I use libtool 1.5.22 Hope that helps,

[Wireshark-dev] Question about the CCITT/ITU/CRC-16 routine (crc16.c)

2006-12-11 Thread Stig Bjørlykke
Hi. I am developing a dissector for a new protocol (an extension found in STANAG 4406 Ed. 2 Annex E) which specifies usage of the CCITT-16 mechanism described in ITU-T X.25. As I want this dissector to be included in Wireshark I want to implement the checksum checking the correct way, by

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Malformed packets in CORBA protocol plugin

2006-12-11 Thread Andy . Ling
First a bit of history for those not keeping up. I have found that any CORBA dissector built using the omniidl / python stuff marks a packet as Malformed for CORBA 1.2 requests that don't have any arguments. I have tracked the problem down to a ReportedBoundsError exception being thrown by start_

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Question about the CCITT/ITU/CRC-16 routine (crc16.c)

2006-12-11 Thread Richard van der Hoff
Hello, Guess I could chip in here, as the author of crc16.c ... Stig Bjørlykke wrote: > Hi. > > I am developing a dissector for a new protocol (an extension found in > STANAG 4406 Ed. 2 Annex E) which specifies usage of the CCITT-16 > mechanism described in ITU-T X.25. As I want this dissec

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Buildbot fail of the capture tests - how to solve this?

2006-12-11 Thread Gerald Combs
Ulf Lamping wrote: > Hi! > > The Win32 buildbot currently fails to run the command line tests I've > written. > > This is due to the fact that the capture interface (number 3 in this > case) doesn't capture enough traffic in a "reasonable amount of time" (I > think the timeout is set to 10s) s

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Malformed packets in CORBA protocol plugin

2006-12-11 Thread Guy Harris
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > In dissect_giop_request_1_2 there is some code that looks like :- > > decode_ServiceContextList(tvb, request_tree, &offset, > stream_is_big_endian, GIOP_HEADER_SIZE); > > /* >* GIOP 1.2 Request body must fall on an 8 octet alignment, taking in

Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-commits] rev 20115: /trunk/test/ /trunk/test/: config.sh suite-capture.sh

2006-12-11 Thread Ulf Lamping
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=rev&revision=20115 > > User: gerald > Date: 2006/12/11 06:24 PM > > Log: > The capture test suite currently fails on quiet networks. Try to fix > this by generating some ICMP packets before each test. Add an "icmp" >

Re: [Wireshark-dev] [PATCH] COS DSCP Column patch

2006-12-11 Thread Stephen Fisher
On Sun, Dec 10, 2006 at 04:00:39PM +0100, Thomas Sillaber wrote: > here's the working patch/diff. I've committed your patch for new IP DSCP and L2 COS columns as SVN revision 20118 and added you to the authors list. I made a few minor formatting changes to fix spacing/tabs and added "(802.1p)"

Re: [Wireshark-dev] [PATCH] COS DSCP Column patch

2006-12-11 Thread Stephen Fisher
On Sun, Dec 10, 2006 at 07:00:30PM -0800, Stephen Fisher wrote: > While testing, I noticed that the way Wireshark sizes columns could > use some tweaking (unrelated to your patch). Since your new columns > are narrow (one is one character and one is two), any column title > longer than that d

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Question about the CCITT/ITU/CRC-16 routine (crc16.c)

2006-12-11 Thread Stig Bjørlykke
Den 11. des. 2006 kl. 19.24 skrev Richard van der Hoff: > The difference between your table and the one in crc16.h is the > setting > of the "reverse" flag - essentially whether bits are shifted right or > left as the crc calculation progresses. Thank you for your clarification. I think I will

Re: [Wireshark-dev] [PATCH] ieee80211 integer overflow

2006-12-11 Thread Gerald Combs
Thanks for finding this! Looking at the code, is there any reason dissect_vendor_ie_wpawme(), dissect_vendor_ie_rsn(), dissect_vendor_ie_aironet(), and dissect_rsn_ie() need to access the packet data directly via tvb_get_ptr()? Would it be better to convert them to use other tvb_get_* routines?

Re: [Wireshark-dev] [PATCH] ieee80211 integer overflow

2006-12-11 Thread Gerald Combs
Neil Kettle wrote: > (on another note, my mail address has changed from [EMAIL PROTECTED] > (AUTHORS)) Fixed. ___ Wireshark-dev mailing list Wireshark-dev@wireshark.org http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev

[Wireshark-dev] [PATCH] stats_tree.c fixup preventing segfault

2006-12-11 Thread Sebastien Tandel
Hi all, here is a patch against svn rev20122 which prevents wireshark from segfault when trying the stats module "packet length". the function affected is get_range in epan/stats_tree.c which did not the correct tests if you want define range like the following : "-" "10-" "-10" "0-10" givin

Re: [Wireshark-dev] [PATCH] ieee80211 integer overflow

2006-12-11 Thread Joerg Mayer
On Mon, Dec 11, 2006 at 04:43:55PM -0800, Gerald Combs wrote: > Thanks for finding this! Looking at the code, is there any reason > dissect_vendor_ie_wpawme(), dissect_vendor_ie_rsn(), > dissect_vendor_ie_aironet(), and dissect_rsn_ie() need to access the > packet data directly via tvb_get_ptr()?