Re: [Wireshark-dev] Patches to update PANA Protocol dissector

2007-06-14 Thread Jaap Keuter
Hi, Committed in revision 22098. Thanx, Jaap Victor Fajardo wrote: > Hi, > > Attached is a patch based on rev 22093. > > regards, > victor > >> Hi, >> >> Could you recreate the patch against the current tree? Your revision >> 21417 is too old and doesn't apply. >> >> Thanx, >> Jaap >> >> Vic

[Wireshark-dev] Fwd: [PATCH] FTBP: ContentsTypeParameter and Relationship are OPTIONAL

2007-06-14 Thread Stig Bjørlykke
Hi. Resending this patch as nobody had a look at it before. -- Forwarded message -- From: Stig Bjørlykke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: 16.mai.2007 10:10 Subject: [PATCH] FTBP: ContentsTypeParameter and Relationship are OPTIONAL To: wireshark-dev@wireshark.org Hi. ContentsTypePara

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Fwd: [PATCH] FTBP: ContentsTypeParameter andRelationship are OPTIONAL

2007-06-14 Thread Anders Broman (AL/EAB)
Hi, Could you test to regenerate the dissector with the -X and -T options set? ../../tools/asn2wrs.py" -b -X -T -e -p Regards Anders -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Stig Bjørlykke Sent: den 14 juni 2007 09:44 To: wireshark-dev@wireshark.o

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Fwd: [PATCH] FTBP: ContentsTypeParameter andRelationship are OPTIONAL

2007-06-14 Thread Stig Bjørlykke
2007/6/14, Anders Broman (AL/EAB) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Could you test to regenerate the dissector with the -X and -T options set? > ../../tools/asn2wrs.py" -b -X -T -e -p Seems to work correctly on my captures. -- Stig Bjørlykke ___ Wireshark-dev ma

Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Spam] to start capturing externally

2007-06-14 Thread Amit . Paliwal
HI, yes i want to do it in absolute way. Actually I need to start capture and all from my interface which will run wireshark in background and from the same interface i will give command to save file in XML format, but GUI will not come into the picture. Philip could you please elaborate more o

Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Spam] to start capturing externally

2007-06-14 Thread Amit . Paliwal
One more problem is ... i cant use command line options because command line options require me to give stop condition in advance like stop after 10 sec etcbut i want to stop it dynamically when i want Phillip Paradis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 06/14/2007 12:24 PM

Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-commits] rev 21831: /trunk/ /trunk/epan/dissectors/: Makefile.nmake packet-ieee80211.c packet-ieee80211.h packet-radiotap.c /trunk/gtk/: Makefile.nmake airpcap_dlg.c air

2007-06-14 Thread SAWADA Kentaro
I'm still facing the same problem unless remove the following line in config.nmake of 0.99.6-SVN-22098. AIRPCAP_DIR=$(WIRESHARK_LIBS)\AirPcap_Devpack_1_0_0_594\AirPcap_Devpack If I keep AIRPCAP_DIR line, I've got this error. packet-ieee80211.c(83) : fatal error C1083: 'airpcap.h': No

[Wireshark-dev] FW: [Wireshark-commits] rev 22100: /trunk/epan/dissectors/ /trunk/epan/dissectors/: packet-catapult-dct2000.c

2007-06-14 Thread Anders Broman (AL/EAB)
Hi, Still no go :( packet-catapult-dct2000.c packet-catapult-dct2000.c(384) : error C2220: warning treated as error - no obje ct file generated packet-catapult-dct2000.c(384) : warning C4244: '=' : conversion from 'unsigned short ' to 'unsigned char ', possible loss of data NMAKE : fatal error U10

Re: [Wireshark-dev] same PDU over differnt number of TCP-Segements causes wrong reassembling

2007-06-14 Thread Robert Naumann
Robert Naumann wrote: > Hello, > > i have got a new problem with tcp_dissect_pdus(). I got a PDU with the > fixed header lenght of 8 Bytes, which also contains the lenght of the > whole PDU. The lenght-information is stored in the 3th Byte, so the > minimum Headersize is 3. The Datalength of t

Re: [Wireshark-dev] same PDU over differnt number of TCP-Segements causes wrong reassembling

2007-06-14 Thread Janusz Chorko
Robert Naumann pisze: > No answer? Noone ever had a similar problem? I wanna know if this could > be a bug in desegment_tcp()-code or if i'm doing something wrong. This > different (wrong) reassembling and dissection only caused by different > splitting over TCP-Segments makes no sense. My Diss

Re: [Wireshark-dev] FW: [Wireshark-commits] rev 22100: /trunk/epan/dissectors/ /trunk/epan/dissectors/: packet-catapult-dct2000.c

2007-06-14 Thread Martin Mathieson
Looks like it got past it now... Martin On 6/14/07, Anders Broman (AL/EAB) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > Still no go :( > packet-catapult-dct2000.c > packet-catapult-dct2000.c(384) : error C2220: warning treated as error - > no obje > ct file generated > packet-catapult-dct2000.c(384) : warn

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Fwd: [PATCH] FTBP: ContentsTypeParameter andRelationship are OPTIONAL

2007-06-14 Thread Anders Broman
Hi, Committed revision 22103. I there a reason why this is a separate dissector and not included in X.420 as it seems to belong in the same set of asn1 files? Regards Anders -Ursprungligt meddelande- Från: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] För Stig Bjørlykke Skickat: den 14 juni

[Wireshark-dev] [PATCH] Display TCP streams as Python strings

2007-06-14 Thread Jeremy Jethro
diff -Naur wireshark-0.99.5/gtk/follow_dlg.c wireshark-0.99.5-pkts2python/gtk/follow_dlg.c --- wireshark-0.99.5/gtk/follow_dlg.c 2007-02-01 17:55:20.0 -0500 +++ wireshark-0.99.5-pkts2python/gtk/follow_dlg.c 2007-06-14 16:06:28.0 -0400 @@ -87,6 +87,7 @@ SHOW_EBCDIC,

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Using pipes on Windows

2007-06-14 Thread c-keel
Yes, the script works. Thank you. > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Hi everyone. > > > > I am currently working with Wireshark 0.99.5. > > > > I know that it is possible on Unix machines to let > Wireshark read from a pipe. I am not really sure if it is > possible on Windows. > > > > For this re