Re: [Wireshark-dev] [PATCH] BACnet bacapp fixes for bug 1670

2007-07-06 Thread Jaap Keuter
Hi, Checked in revision 22262 and closed bug 1670. Thanx, Jaap Steve Karg wrote: > Hello Developers, > > Attached is a patch that fixes bug 1670 and related issues. > > For the BACnet GetEventInformation-ACK request dissector: > 1. Corrected BitString decoding for acknowledgedTransitions and e

[Wireshark-dev] [PATCH] BACnet bacapp fixes for bug 1670

2007-07-06 Thread Steve Karg
Hello Developers, Attached is a patch that fixes bug 1670 and related issues. For the BACnet GetEventInformation-ACK request dissector: 1. Corrected BitString decoding for acknowledgedTransitions and eventEnable. 2. Corrected the ability to decode more than one event. 3. Grouped each item of th

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Wireshark conference

2007-07-06 Thread Jaap Keuter
Hi, I think everyone should bring his passport so we can address Bug 1086. Thanx, Jaap Gerald Combs wrote: > This is entirely hypothetical, but if someone were to host a 3-day > Wireshark conference, what sort of sessions would you be interested in? > If enough developers attended, would there b

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Wireshark 0.99.6 is now available

2007-07-06 Thread Jaap Keuter
Hi, It would have been nice if it contained an up to date user manual i.s.o. a 5 month old version. Could that item be added to the release procedure? I've already checked in a patch that proposes to install WinPcap 4.0.1 over 4.0.0, which the current installer doesn't do. Thanx, Jaap Gerald

Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-commits] rev 22259: /trunk/packaging/nsis/ /trunk/packaging/nsis/: wireshark.nsi

2007-07-06 Thread Ulf Lamping
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: > http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=rev&revision=22259 > > User: jake > Date: 2007/07/06 08:34 PM > > Log: > Have the installer propose to install 4.0.1 over 4.0.0. > > I was already writing the mail to complain ;-) Thanks for fixing it already. Un

Re: [Wireshark-dev] [PATCH]: New packet disscetor for IEEE1588v2 / PTPv2

2007-07-06 Thread Guy Harris
Anders Broman wrote: > I will appliy the ETHERTYPES patch but can you please change the other patch > to not do: > - * Wireshark - Network traffic analyzer > - * By Gerald Combs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > + * Ethereal - Network traffic analyzer > + * By Gerald Combs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > There is also

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Wireshark-dev Digest, Vol 14, Issue 16

2007-07-06 Thread Anders Broman
Hi, What of Assured Services SIP messages do you think Wireshark can't do? Regards Anders -Ursprungligt meddelande- Från: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] För Raymond Jender Skickat: den 6 juli 2007 16:50 Till: wireshark-dev@wireshark.org Ämne: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Wireshark-dev

[Wireshark-dev] TCP Reassembly issues

2007-07-06 Thread Graham Bloice
I'm still having issues with TCP reassembly when PDU's are split across TCP segments. This is a local build of r22258. The attached capture shows the problem in frame 5 which has the end of the first DNP 3 PDU in bytes 0-67 and the start of the next PDU in bytes 68-89. For the second PDU, the DN

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Wireshark-dev Digest, Vol 14, Issue 16

2007-07-06 Thread Raymond Jender
Jaap, See RFC 4412 for details... Thanks, Ray > Today's Topics: > >1. AS-SIP Disector? (Raymond Jender) >2. Re: AS-SIP Disector? (Jaap Keuter) > -- > > Message: 1 > Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 19:07:22 -0700 (PDT) > Fr

Re: [Wireshark-dev] [PATCH] PMIPv6

2007-07-06 Thread Anders Broman
Committed revision 22258. Regards Anders -Ursprungligt meddelande- Från: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] För Nicolas Dichtel Skickat: den 27 juni 2007 11:00 Till: wireshark-dev@wireshark.org Ämne: [Wireshark-dev] [PATCH] PMIPv6 Hi, please find enclosed two patchs. First patch

Re: [Wireshark-dev] [PATCH]: New packet disscetor for IEEE1588v2 / PTPv2

2007-07-06 Thread Anders Broman
Hi, I will appliy the ETHERTYPES patch but can you please change the other patch to not do: - * Wireshark - Network traffic analyzer - * By Gerald Combs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> + * Ethereal - Network traffic analyzer + * By Gerald Combs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> There is also another instance of "Ethereal" t