> > It could be defined in asn1//Makefile.common
> > E.g. gsmmap or qsiq does not use -p and will define
> it (when conevrted to new asn1 makefile style)
>
> The Makefile.inc modifications were breaking the non-Windows builders
because
> automake was trying to intrepret the "ifdef" directive in
Richard van der Hoff schrieb:
> Hi guys,
>
> I note that some of the capture tests are failing on both windows and
> solaris: does anyone fancy investigating what's going on here?
>
Hi Richard!
I guess these failures are related to changes I've done in tshark two or
three weeks ago to impleme
Antoine Reid wrote:
>
> 1- When viewing a dump and hitting the "Statistics/VoIP Calls" menu choice:
>
>1a- In the window that pops up, display the filename if available
> (this is useful when you have multiple instances of Wireshark running,
> each displaying a different capture)
Seen someth
Hi,
One of the design goals of the Wireshark code base is portability. This
proposal seems to revolve around platform and compiler specific hacks,
contradicting this principle. So it will probably remain a seperate
patch, not included in trunk. What do you propose on maintenance of this
patch?
I have committed changes for the following under Revision 23089:
- Add the filename as part of the title on the Voip calls, Graph and RTP
Player windows
- Make the calls selection on the Voip Calls window "standard", meaning
using the build in GTK functions (the CTRL and SHIFT can be used to make
Hi
Some time ago I did work on a faster wireshark and it could be useful to others.
Is it ok if I upload the diff (~ 250 KB) in the wiki?
Notes:
- gtk1 and gtk2 but it's glibc and gcc only (easy to change).
- It was for running on G4 Macs ie a not registers starved CPU with rather
slow memory.
-
Hi guys,
I note that some of the capture tests are failing on both windows and
solaris: does anyone fancy investigating what's going on here?
Cheers
Richard
___
Wireshark-dev mailing list
Wireshark-dev@wireshark.org
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/li
Hi,
Ive done it for you see
http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-commits/200710/msg00041.html
Best regards
Anders
_
Från: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] För keith mercer
Skickat: den 7 oktober 2007 15:12
Till: wireshark-dev@wireshark.org
Ämne: [Wireshark-dev] P
Martin Mathieson wrote:
> Have you looked at this new submission in detail, or tried it out?
>Does it handle anything that is missing from the current one we have,
> or handle something in a better way?
> I don't actually work with WiMAX, and haven't asked colleagues who
> do to play with this n
I have recently completed a plugin for CFM (802.1ag) and the only bug left I am
trying to fix before I submit my code is that for some odd reason Wireshark is
still reporting that the ethertype is unknown even though the packets are
filtered and dissected properly. See example in the picture I
10 matches
Mail list logo
