[Wireshark-dev] FSCB3 dissector field names

2007-11-16 Thread Stephen Fisher
Is anyone here familar with the FCSB3 dissector ("Fibre Channel Single Byte Command") or protocol? We have bug #1804 (http://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1804) open, which needs a decision on how to standardize the first part of the whether to standardize the first part of the displ

[Wireshark-dev] Packaging automation (was: Re: PortableApps Wireshark feedback)

2007-11-16 Thread Stephen Fisher
On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 08:18:54PM +0100, Ulf Lamping wrote: > Having a meta format to describe the required files seems a good idea. > However, I don't think we currently have a tool to handle XML and I > don't like the idea of adding another tool. As the number of tools a > newbie needs to inst

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Optimization patches - GUI

2007-11-16 Thread Didier
Hi, On Fri, 16 Nov 2007 09:45:57 +0100, Anders Broman wrote > Hi, > Could some one with GTK knowledge take a look at these patches from > http://wiki.wireshark.org/Development/Optimization > > I think they look OK. 04_menu_select_pane1.patch is already in svn, it had the side effect of fi

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Dissector for OID:2.6.0.2.5 not implemented. Contact Etheral developers if you want this supported

2007-11-16 Thread Graeme Lunt
John, > I'm responding to this request in my trace file. As Anders points out, the OID is id-as-mrse - which is just one of the abstract syntaxes of the X.400 P7 message store access application context. Your trace file is probably also telling you that the following are not implemented: id-as-m

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Dissector for OID:2.6.0.2.5 not implemented. Contact Etheral developers if you want this supported

2007-11-16 Thread Anders Broman
Hi, Supplying the trace/packet where the printout occurred would be nice too ;-) Also what version of WS are you using. Here's what I dug up: {joint-iso-itu-t(2) mhs(6) protocols(0) as(2) message-retrieval-abstract-syntax-88(5)} Description: Abstract Syntax for Message Retrieval Service Element

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Dissector for OID:2.6.0.2.5 not implemented. Contact Etheral developers if you want this supported

2007-11-16 Thread john dite
Hi, I'm responding to this request in my trace file. Is this all I have to or do I also have to supply the appropriate Dissector? ;-) Many thanks in advance! Kind regards John Dite ___ Wireshark-dev mailing list Wireshark-dev@wireshark.org http://www

Re: [Wireshark-dev] MATE question

2007-11-16 Thread Luis EG Ontanon
MATE registers a do-nothing tap just to have the configured fields to be extracted being marked as interesting, other than that there's no reason for the tap to exist. mate_tree() is not invoked by the tap but it is being called by dissect_frame() after all other dissector had run. What's happeni

[Wireshark-dev] Optimize -> dfilter

2007-11-16 Thread Anders Broman
Hi, Can some one with some knowledge about the filter engine look at these? http://wiki.wireshark.org/Development/Optimization Regards Anders 39_dfilter_zero_register_on_exit.patch Description: Binary data 40_dfilter_hoist_constant_init.patch Description: Binary data 38_dfilter_fix_goto.patc

[Wireshark-dev] Optimization patches - GUI

2007-11-16 Thread Anders Broman
Hi, Could some one with GTK knowledge take a look at these patches from http://wiki.wireshark.org/Development/Optimization I think they look OK. Best regards Anders 03_hexa_pane.patch Description: Binary data 04_menu_select_pane1.patch Description: Binary data 02_menu_select.patch D

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Smallest patch to req_resp_hdrs.{c|h}

2007-11-16 Thread Kaul
Sorry, attached. On Nov 16, 2007 12:51 AM, Mike Duigou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It looks like the req_resp_hdrs.c portion of the patch was not included. > Could you resend it? > > Mike > > Kaul wrote: > > This very small patch declares two variables passed to the function as > > const, and re