[Wireshark-dev] 0.99.7pre1: missing preferences for fcoe and samr

2007-11-22 Thread Ulf Lamping
Hi! I've just tested latest pre1 and get the following warnings: 11:59:34 Warn C:\Dokumente und Einstellungen\ulfl\Anwendungsdaten\Wires hark\preferences line 1143: No such preference fcoe.ethertype (applying your p references once should remove this warning) 11:59:34 Warn

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Build error: NMAKE : fatal error U1077: 'sed'

2007-11-22 Thread Stage Ontw
My problem seems to been fixed now. In the file config.nmake I tried to add a version with a '/' and spaces in it (after VERSION_EXTRA=). I think sed fails in this part of the makefile. But the strange thing is, if I deleted the version after the problem had occurred, the building process still

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Conversation filters

2007-11-22 Thread Kukosa, Tomas
Hi, Actually, what I suggested will only give one side of the conversa\tion that you're interested in. However, (ip.addr==ADDR1 and tcp.port==PORT1) and (ip.addr=ADDR2 and tcp.port==PORT2) should do the trick. It is the original filter which matches both streams. I am able to define

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Conversation filters

2007-11-22 Thread Andy Lawman
Actually, what I suggested will only give one side of the conversa\tion that you're interested in. However, (ip.addr==ADDR1 and tcp.port==PORT1) and (ip.addr=ADDR2 and tcp.port==PORT2) should do the trick. Andy. Andy Lawman [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Developer support list for Wireshark

Re: [Wireshark-dev] 0.99.7pre1: missing preferences for fcoe and samr

2007-11-22 Thread Jaap Keuter
Hi, This results from the blunt removal of preference settings from a dissector. If one follows the developer guidelines you should know that these need to be replaced with prefs_register_protocol_obsolete(). So those who checked in the changes dropping preferences, please fix them and add

[Wireshark-dev] Seting up build env. and building from a tarball

2007-11-22 Thread Anders Broman
Hi, I just got a new PC at work and is trying to restore my build environment, when i build from a tarball it failes with: help_dlg.c(49) : fatal error C1083: Cannot open include file: 'htmlhelp.h': No such file or directory I have a vauge memmory of some extra library/feature was needed to build

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Seting up build env. and building from a tarball

2007-11-22 Thread Martin Mathieson
I recently followed the instructions found in http://www.wireshark.org/docs/wsdg_html_chunked/ChSetupWin32.html#ChSetupMSVC and it worked like a charm. These steps do include installing the platform SDK. Martin On Nov 22, 2007 5:50 PM, Anders Broman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I just got

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Seting up build env. and building from a tarball

2007-11-22 Thread Stephen Fisher
On Thu, Nov 22, 2007 at 06:50:32PM +0100, Anders Broman wrote: I just got a new PC at work and is trying to restore my build environment, when i build from a tarball it failes with: help_dlg.c(49) : fatal error C1083: Cannot open include file: 'htmlhelp.h': No such file or directory I have a

[Wireshark-dev] A routine to handle TLVs

2007-11-22 Thread Stig Bjørlykke
Hi. After looking at a dissector with TLV handling I really think we should implement the wishlist element to handle this in proto.c Has anyone been looking at this lately? We should really have a uniform way to present this... -- Stig Bjørlykke

Re: [Wireshark-dev] 0.99.7pre1: missing preferences for fcoe and samr

2007-11-22 Thread Stephen Fisher
On Thu, Nov 22, 2007 at 12:09:47PM +0100, Ulf Lamping wrote: I've just tested latest pre1 and get the following warnings: 11:59:34 Warn C:\Dokumente und Einstellungen\ulfl\Anwendungsdaten\Wires hark\preferences line 1143: No such preference fcoe.ethertype (applying your p

Re: [Wireshark-dev] A routine to handle TLVs

2007-11-22 Thread Sébastien Tandel
Hi, I've started an implementation a while ago. Never ended though and being at the first stage of development. I can share it with you if you want. Regards, Sebastien Tandel On Nov 22, 2007 5:30 PM, Stig Bjørlykke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi. After looking at a dissector with TLV handling I

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Seting up build env. and building from a tarball

2007-11-22 Thread Anders Broman
Hi, That is the one. I knew I'd seen it before, I'll try it tomorrow. Thanks Anders -Ursprungligt meddelande- Från: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] För Stephen Fisher Skickat: den 22 november 2007 19:26 Till: Developer support list for Wireshark Ämne: Re: [Wireshark-dev]

Re: [Wireshark-dev] A routine to handle TLVs

2007-11-22 Thread Stig Bjørlykke
On 22. nov.. 2007, at 20.51, Sébastien Tandel wrote: I've started an implementation a while ago. Never ended though and being at the first stage of development. I can share it with you if you want. Yup. Send it over, and I'll have a look what I can do. Did you use something from

Re: [Wireshark-dev] A routine to handle TLVs

2007-11-22 Thread Sébastien Tandel
I indeed pick-up the ip and ipv6 options dissection functions as references. Regards, Sebastien Tandel On Nov 22, 2007 6:28 PM, Stig Bjørlykke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 22. nov.. 2007, at 20.51, Sébastien Tandel wrote: I've started an implementation a while ago. Never ended though and

[Wireshark-dev] who know the SMB protocol used in the wireshark

2007-11-22 Thread 晓阳
Now I use the wireshark capture the communication process under the SMB protocol. But I can not understand the SMB protocol fields. Who can help me to understand this protocol? Or give me the SMB used in the wireshark. Thanks a lot. ___

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Startup speed up - remove dissectors?!

2007-11-22 Thread Didier
On Thu, 22 Nov 2007 06:08:37 +0100, Joerg Mayer wrote On Thu, Nov 22, 2007 at 10:19:10AM +0530, Gilbert Ramirez wrote: The other solution mentioned (converting everything into plugins) doesn't work very well either (getting all the references right, lots of overhead if many plugins need to be