Is there any reason ./configure --with-ssl isn't on by default [if the
libs are found] on Unix builds?
Steve
___
Wireshark-dev mailing list
Wireshark-dev@wireshark.org
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
Hi
[UTF-8?]On Sun, 2 Dec 2007 22:48:12 +0100, Stig Bjørlykke wrote
> On 2. des.. 2007, at 16.49, Didier wrote:
> > cf patch attached.
>
> Ah, I see. But I think the Protocol column is a bit harder to read
> with the filter appended like this.
I agree.
>
> I suppose you want to use this to crea
On 2. des.. 2007, at 16.49, Didier wrote:
> Hi,
> [UTF-8?]On Fri, 30 Nov 2007 16:37:55 +0100, Stig Bjørlykke wrote
>> You should try svn r23686 or later :)
> Interesting but it's not what I had in mind:
> cf patch attached.
Ah, I see. But I think the Protocol column is a bit harder to read
wi
Hello,
Here is a dissector for the Real Time Messaging Protocol which is used by
the Flash plug-in for the live video streaming with the Adobe Flash
Communication Server.
As a dissector for another protocol named "RTMP" already exists in
Wireshark (AppleTalk protocol) , I took an alternate nam
I can't compile latest SVN for the last two days or so, getting:
packet-kerberos.c(74) : fatal error C1083: Cannot open include file: 'des.h':
No
such file or directory
...
packet-isakmp.c(50) : fatal error C1083: Cannot open include file: 'hmac.h':
No
such file or directory
...
packet-dcerpc-nt
Ulf Lamping wrote:
> Would it make sense to change the defaults here?
The default for both is currently "on", but if, for example, you had run
an older version where the default was "off", and hadn't changed the
settings, and had saved those settings, the changes to the defaults
won't affect y
Hi,
[UTF-8?]On Fri, 30 Nov 2007 16:37:55 +0100, Stig Bjørlykke wrote
> 2007/11/29, Didier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > The filter value somewhere in the Protocol hierarchy stat would be nice too.
>
> You should try svn r23686 or later :)
Interesting but it's not what I had in mind:
cf patch attached.
On Sun, Dec 02, 2007 at 01:20:12PM +0100, Ulf Lamping wrote:
> Guy Harris schrieb:
> > prashanth joshi wrote:
> >
> >> I am curious to know whether there is reassembly of the IP datagram at
> >> the IP layer.
> >
> > Yes, Ethereal/Wireshark has done that for many years. You should turn
> > on
Guy Harris schrieb:
> prashanth joshi wrote:
>
>
>> I am curious to know whether there is reassembly of the IP datagram at
>> the IP layer.
>>
>
> Yes, Ethereal/Wireshark has done that for many years. You should turn
> on the "Reassemble fragmented IP datagrams" preference for IP and, fo
prashanth joshi wrote:
> I am curious to know whether there is reassembly of the IP datagram at
> the IP layer.
Yes, Ethereal/Wireshark has done that for many years. You should turn
on the "Reassemble fragmented IP datagrams" preference for IP and, for
IPv6, the "Reassemble fragmented IPv6 da
10 matches
Mail list logo
