[Wireshark-dev] possibility of USB capture on windows

2008-02-26 Thread JoJo jojo
Hi everyone, what is the current capability of wireshark, with capturing all USB traffic on windows. Capturing all usb needs to be stressed, not just ethernet over usb. currently trying out wireshark as sniffUSB v1.8 or v2.0 don't work quite right in all the situations. which binaries to try, o

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Outstanding 0.99.8 issues

2008-02-26 Thread Gerald Combs
Bill Meier wrote: >> I'd like to release 0.99.8 tomorrow or Wednesday. > > I've updated the INSTALL file somewhat to match current Wireshark. > However, I think there's a bit more updating needed as to the use of > setuid & root privileges & etc. > > I removed some comments about "don't use set

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Compilation problem due to recent changes in init_wslua.c

2008-02-26 Thread Jeff Morriss
Jeff Morriss wrote: > > > Peter Johansson wrote: >> I get the following when attempting to compile init_wslua.c rev 24479 >> on Win, using VS2005EE. Anyone else that has run into this or is it >> just my (newly set up) dev env that is wrong? > > Oops, that's my fault. I checked in a fix rev

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Compilation problem due to recent changes in init_wslua.c

2008-02-26 Thread Jeff Morriss
Peter Johansson wrote: > I get the following when attempting to compile init_wslua.c rev 24479 on > Win, using VS2005EE. Anyone else that has run into this or is it just my > (newly set up) dev env that is wrong? Oops, that's my fault. I checked in a fix rev 24482--hopefully that's it (I'll

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Compilation problem due to recent chang es in init_wslua.c

2008-02-26 Thread Bill Meier
Peter Johansson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I get the following when attempting to compile init_wslua.c rev 24479 on Win, using VS2005EE. Anyone else that has run into this or is it just my (newly set up) dev env that is wrong? > > No: It's not you. :) :) My Windows build fails in

[Wireshark-dev] Compilation problem due to recent changes in init_wslua.c

2008-02-26 Thread Peter Johansson
I get the following when attempting to compile init_wslua.c rev 24479 on Win, using VS2005EE. Anyone else that has run into this or is it just my (newly set up) dev env that is wrong? Microsoft (R) Program Maintenance Utility Version 8.00.50727.762 Copyright (C) Microsoft Corporation. All rights

Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-commits] rev 24475: /trunk-0.99.8/ /trunk-0.99.8/docbook/: release-notes.xml /trunk-0.99.8/: configure.in

2008-02-26 Thread Gerald Combs
Fixed. Thanks! Jeff Morriss wrote: > Hi Gerald, > > Did you want to (also) copy 24471 (which fixes the SCTP crash) over? > Also the SCTP crash release notes seem to point to the SNMP bug. > > Regards, > -Jeff > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=r

Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-commits] rev 24475: /trunk-0.99.8/ /trunk-0.99.8/docbook/: release-notes.xml /trunk-0.99.8/: configure.in

2008-02-26 Thread Jeff Morriss
Hi Gerald, Did you want to (also) copy 24471 (which fixes the SCTP crash) over? Also the SCTP crash release notes seem to point to the SNMP bug. Regards, -Jeff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=rev&revision=24475 > > User: gerald > Date: 2008/02/26

[Wireshark-dev] why is tvb->realdata not null for a tvb of type TVBUFF_SUBSET

2008-02-26 Thread Chidamabaram Arunachalam
Hi Team, I am new to wireshark development and need help with the following: >From my understanding, when a tvb is of type of "TVBUFF_SUBSET", its real_data needs to be NULL. My dissector registers to decode rtp packets of a user given RTP payload type. I have a problem in which tvb received fr

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Outstanding 0.99.8 issues

2008-02-26 Thread Bill Meier
> I'd like to release 0.99.8 tomorrow or Wednesday. I've updated the INSTALL file somewhat to match current Wireshark. However, I think there's a bit more updating needed as to the use of setuid & root privileges & etc. I removed some comments about "don't use setuid"; It may be that I should

[Wireshark-dev] Google's Summer of Code 2008

2008-02-26 Thread Joerg Mayer
Hello List, a new round of GSoC has been announced: http://code.google.com/soc/2008 We should decide who (if any) is interested in mentoring a project and who would be interested in doing a project and of course what the project(s) would be about. As far as the timeframe is concerned (from URL a

Re: [Wireshark-dev] NBAP: dissection of Private Messages

2008-02-26 Thread Anders Broman
Hi, There may not be a dissector table for private IE:s which in that case needs to be added. How much of the message is decoded presently? Regards Anders Från: [EMAIL PROTECTED] genom [EMAIL PROTECTED] Skickat: ti 2008-02-26 19:54 Till: Developer support list fo

Re: [Wireshark-dev] NBAP: dissection of Private Messages

2008-02-26 Thread praveen . jha
Hi, "PrivateMessage" PDU is already defined in the NBAP spec, but it doesn't have any IEs currently. I am adding IEs to it (PrivateMessage-IEs). PrivateMessage-IEs NBAP-PRIVATE-IES ::= { { ID local:id-type-1 CRITICALITY criticality TYPE Sample-Message-Type PRESENCE optional} , ... } Regards ">

Re: [Wireshark-dev] NBAP: dissection of Private Messages

2008-02-26 Thread Anders Broman
Hi, Are you trying to add private PDU:s or Privare IE:s to a existing PDU? Can you post a .pcap file of the message? Regards Anders From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: den 26 februari 2008 17:25 To: wireshark-d

[Wireshark-dev] why is tvb->realdata not null for a tvb of type TVBUFF_SUBSET

2008-02-26 Thread Arun
Hi Team, I am new to wireshark development and need help with the following: >From my understanding, when a tvb is of type of "TVBUFF_SUBSET", its real_data needs to be NULL. My dissector registers to decode rtp packets of a user given RTP payload type. I have a problem in which tvb received fr

[Wireshark-dev] NBAP: dissection of Private Messages

2008-02-26 Thread praveen . jha
Hi, I am trying to implement the dissection of NBAP containing private message(s). For that I am including my private message in asn1 format. the message format is as follows : -- *

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Outstanding 0.99.8 issues

2008-02-26 Thread Jaap Keuter
Gerald Combs wrote: > The 0.99.8 roadmap still has the following items in the pending queue: > . >- Items marked with {1} in the TODO list of Development/SNMP > > I let this slide in the last release with unfortunate consequences. > Is there anything in this list that's a show-st

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Outstanding 0.99.8 issues

2008-02-26 Thread Jaap Keuter
Ulf Lamping wrote: > Gerald Combs schrieb: >> The 0.99.8 roadmap still has the following items in the pending queue: >> >>- Move over revisions 24465, 24466, and 24467 >> >> I'll take care of this tonight or tomorrow. >> >>- Update the Windows PCRE package >> >> Is there an up-to-