The recent changes (since Jan 30) that have been applied to epan\oids.c
causes problems, at least on Windows.
I ran into the problem today when I thought I should have a go at bug #2356.
I opened wireshark-gtk2\wireshark.exe as the solution to use in Developer
Studio 2005 (not EE), just to be able
2008/3/13, Peter Johansson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> The recent changes (since Jan 30) that have been applied to epan\oids.c
> causes problems, at least on Windows.
> I ran into the problem today when I thought I should have a go at bug
> #2356.
>
> I opened wireshark-gtk2\wireshark.exe as the solut
2008/3/13, Peter Johansson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> The problems are due to the changes applied to oids.c March 5 (SVN 24569),
> not from Jan 30 as I said before.
Oops. I found this when looking for memory leakage on Ubuntu, and
this functions returned malloc'ed memory which was not free'd.
I supp
On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 2:38 PM, Stig Bjørlykke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I suppose we have to leave them allocated if we don't know how libsmi
> is compiled?
> I have almost no experience on Windows, do we compile this our self?
I compiled it, I just made changes to the makefile (and build
Hi,
I am using RHEL 4 32 bit m/c. I wanted wireshark to compile with
gtk-1.2.10. It got compiled and installed. Even building the rpm dint
have any problem.
But when I tried to install the rpm , I am getting the following error:
error: Failed dependencies:
libiconv.so.2 is needed by
2008/3/13, Luis EG Ontanon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 2:38 PM, Stig Bjørlykke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > I suppose we have to leave them allocated if we don't know how libsmi
> > is compiled?
> > I have almost no experience on Windows, do we compile this our self?
>
>
> Did you compile it using MSVC 6? Could this then be of the same type of
> issue that is with adns, hence it is required to recompile libsmi too if
> using another compiler for Wireshark on Windows than MSVC 6. Developer
> Studio 2005EE for instance?
I cannot swear on it but I would bet high that
Hi,
There's something strange around line 3357 it calls proto_tree_add_xxx
functions with bp_tree before initializing it.
?
Didier
___
Wireshark-dev mailing list
Wireshark-dev@wireshark.org
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
Guy Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Merlin Hooze wrote:
>
> > For a disector plugin, if the fixed length part of the message is
> > split across tcp segments, can wireshark reassemble it?
>
> It should be able to do so. If not, that's a bug. (That's why the size
> of the fixed-length
On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 07:39:42PM +0100, Didier wrote:
> There's something strange around line 3357 it calls proto_tree_add_xxx
> functions with bp_tree before initializing it.
Interesting - I'm confused why this is working. I'll take a look.
Thanks!
Joerg
--
Joerg Mayer
Luis EG Ontanon wrote:
>>Did you compile it using MSVC 6? Could this then be of the same type of
>>issue that is with adns, hence it is required to recompile libsmi too if
>>using another compiler for Wireshark on Windows than MSVC 6. Developer
>>Studio 2005EE for instance?
>
>
> I cannot swear o
Armen,
I might be interested in such a tool. Also, by 'bootstrapping
portion' do you mean the one-time epan structure
initialization/destruction calls as well as the proper init/malloc/
free per-packet calls?
rkm
On Mar 12, 2008, at 5:28 PM, Armen Babikyan wrote:
> Hello,
>
> A few mon
On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 08:50:34PM +0100, Jaap Keuter wrote:
> Then I would suggest everyone to take a visit to the bug database and
> start working the almost 300(!) open bug reports.
We also need to get the pending patch requests committed or sent back to
the creator to be fixed.
Steve
___
13 matches
Mail list logo
