[Wireshark-dev] buildbot failure in Wireshark (development) on Solaris-10-SPARC

2009-03-26 Thread buildbot-no-reply
The Buildbot has detected a new failure of Solaris-10-SPARC on Wireshark (development). Full details are available at: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/builders/Solaris-10-SPARC/builds/1346 Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/ Buildslave for this Build: solaris-10-sparc Build

[Wireshark-dev] buildbot failure in Wireshark (development) on Windows-XP-x86

2009-03-26 Thread buildbot-no-reply
The Buildbot has detected a new failure of Windows-XP-x86 on Wireshark (development). Full details are available at: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/builders/Windows-XP-x86/builds/5885 Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/ Buildslave for this Build: windows-xp-x86 Build Reason

[Wireshark-dev] RPM for Wireshark 1.0.0 & above (RHEL 4)

2009-03-26 Thread vinayak kamath
Hi, Where can i find the RPM for Wireshark 1.0.0 & above version for RHEL 4 platform. thanks vinayak ___ Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list Archives:http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https:/

Re: [Wireshark-dev] dissector plugin help

2009-03-26 Thread wsgd
I think the answer is into your first mail : http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev/200902/msg00013.html To include the manifest inside the dll : mt.exe -manifest .dll.manifest - outputresource:.dll;2 Also, into proto_reg_handoff_helen, if you have many ports, you are calling many time

Re: [Wireshark-dev] dissector plugin help

2009-03-26 Thread Brian Oleksa
Olivier (wsgd) I fixed the problem in the code that you found. Thanks again for finding this. I tested it on the development machine and it worked great.!! I then took the created helen.dll file and dropped it on a deploy machine that is running the same version of wireshark that I developed a

Re: [Wireshark-dev] dissector plugin help

2009-03-26 Thread Brian Oleksa
Olivier (wsgd) Thank you very much..!! This was indeed the problem. No wonder it worked on Linux and not Windows :-) I thought for sure that it was a version mismatch or something. Thanks again... I really appreciate it. I have been playing with this all day. Brian wsgd wrote: > Hello, > >

Re: [Wireshark-dev] dissector plugin help

2009-03-26 Thread wsgd
Hello, Into proto_reg_handoff_helen, you try to fopen("/root/ports", "r"), which certainly fails on windows, so you call exit(1). Olivier Brian Oleksa a écrit : > Wiresharkers > > I have followed these instructions: (I used both of these as one was > more clear than the other on certain ta

Re: [Wireshark-dev] save SDP attributes

2009-03-26 Thread Anders Broman
Hi, The SDP dissector saves some info in transport_info_t transport_info; Which the RTP dissector uses perhaps that can be expanded. Regards Anders -Ursprungligt meddelande- Från: wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org [mailto:wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org] För Emanuel Gabl Skickat: den

Re: [Wireshark-dev] How to handle duplicate fragments for a plugin written on top of UDP?

2009-03-26 Thread Jeff Morriss
siri m wrote: > Hi, > > We have a legacy custom plugin (written on top of UDP), which handles > multicast packets which may be fragmented, which works fine for normal > scenarios. However, the plugin fails to decode for the cases where there > can be duplicate fragments (for eg. one coming fr

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Problem with 1.1.3 sources - native-nmake

2009-03-26 Thread Jeff Morriss
Carlos G Mendioroz wrote: > somehow the 1.1.3 windows binary is missing the IAX2 analysis code from > my bug 3217. In finding what did I do wrong, I downloaded 1.1.3 sources > and tried a fresh compile, which ended shortly with a call from > tools/Makefile.nmake of "../native-nmake" which is not

[Wireshark-dev] save SDP attributes

2009-03-26 Thread Emanuel Gabl
Hi everyone, I am trying to get the attributes from the SDP package but in function dissect_sdp_media_attribute the SDP dissector just adds the attribute name and value to the proto tree. I want to get informed from the SDP dissector to save the attributes of a SIP session for later use. Does anyb

Re: [Wireshark-dev] How to handle duplicate fragments for a plugin written on top of UDP?

2009-03-26 Thread philippe alarcon
Hi, If your dissector is on top of UDP, you can check the UDP checksum. The CRC should be the same for identical fragments. Regards Philippe Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 17:13:35 -0800 From: svu...@gmail.com To: wireshark-dev@wireshark.org Subject: [Wireshark-dev] How to handle duplicate fragments f

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Help on ASN2Wrs

2009-03-26 Thread Joerg Mayer
Hello Tomas, On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 08:22:40AM +0100, Kukosa, Tomas wrote: > PS: I am sorry that the asn2wrs.py is not very readable and would need > code cleaning and probably few refactorings. But when I started to write > it (based on Aaron S. Lav's PyZ3950 package) I was not able to imagine >

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Help on ASN2Wrs

2009-03-26 Thread Kukosa, Tomas
Hi Tulip, all t_... are rules for lex.py and all p_... are rules for yacc.py. See http://www.dabeaz.com/ply/ply.html The t_error() is special rule for error handling. If the lex.py finds during rules analysis the rule t_error() it saves it into self.lexerrorf. I.e. when error occures the self