[Wireshark-dev] buildbot failure in Wireshark (development) on OSX-10.5-x86

2009-06-21 Thread buildbot-no-reply
The Buildbot has detected a new failure of OSX-10.5-x86 on Wireshark (development). Full details are available at: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/builders/OSX-10.5-x86/builds/2706 Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/ Buildslave for this Build: osx-10.5-x86 Build Reason: Bui

Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-commits] rev 28794: /trunk/gtk/ /trunk/gtk/: Makefile.common capture_dlg.c capture_file_dlg.c drag_and_drop.c file_dlg_win32.c fileset_dlg.c main.c main.h main_filter_to

2009-06-21 Thread Ulf Lamping
Guy Harris schrieb: > On Jun 21, 2009, at 1:03 PM, Ulf Lamping wrote: > >> g...@wireshark.org schrieb: >>> http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi? >>> view=rev&revision=28794 >>> >>> User: guy >>> Date: 2009/06/21 12:16 PM >>> >>> Log: >>> "main_menu.[ch]" -> "menus.[ch]"; it handles not

Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-commits] rev 28784: /trunk/ /trunk/doc/: Makefile.am Makefile.nmake make-authors-format.pl make-authors-short.pl perlnoutf.pl /trunk/: Makefile.am Makefile.nmake make-au

2009-06-21 Thread Stig Bjørlykke
On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 2:47 PM, wrote: > Log: > Move the generated documentation (man pages, AUTHORS-SHORT-FORMAT, and > AUTHORS-SHORT) into doc/. Help->About when running from compile directory does not find AUTHORS-SHORT. -- Stig Bjørlykke ___

Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-commits] rev 28786: /trunk-1.0/ /trunk-1.0/epan/: enterprise-numbers /trunk-1.0/: manuf

2009-06-21 Thread Jaap Keuter
Hi, Well, trunk-1.0 is now retired. That should mean it gets the minimum attention it needs to stay alive, eg. for GTK1 (a goal which needs 1.0.9 to be released). Otherwise we would call it abandoned and send it to the eternal bitfields. Note to self: update release policy. Thanx, Jaap Stephen

Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-commits] rev 28786: /trunk-1.0/ /trunk-1.0/epan/: enterprise-numbers /trunk-1.0/: manuf

2009-06-21 Thread Stephen Fisher
Is the 1.0 trunk no longer under development or will there be a 1.0.9? On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 03:04:19PM +, ger...@wireshark.org wrote: > http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=rev&revision=28786 > > User: gerald > Date: 2009/06/21 08:04 AM > > Log: > [Automatic manuf and ente

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Excuse me, may I ask a question

2009-06-21 Thread yami
Hi Xiaowei, Please take a look at the following wiki page: http://wiki.wireshark.org/Development/Translations The conclusion section of the above article says: "Translating all the dissector output is practically impossible. But without this, it might not make real sense to translate other

Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-commits] rev 28794: /trunk/gtk/ /trunk/gtk/: Makefile.common capture_dlg.c capture_file_dlg.c drag_and_drop.c file_dlg_win32.c fileset_dlg.c main.c main.h main_filter_to

2009-06-21 Thread Guy Harris
On Jun 21, 2009, at 1:57 PM, Guy Harris wrote: > The menus in question might be part of the main *window*, but they're > not the main (menu bar) menu. As such, if we want to emphasize that > they're menus for the main window, perhaps "main_window_menu.[ch]" or > "main_window_menus.[ch]" would be

Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-commits] rev 28794: /trunk/gtk/ /trunk/gtk/: Makefile.common capture_dlg.c capture_file_dlg.c drag_and_drop.c file_dlg_win32.c fileset_dlg.c main.c main.h main_filter_to

2009-06-21 Thread Guy Harris
On Jun 21, 2009, at 1:03 PM, Ulf Lamping wrote: > g...@wireshark.org schrieb: >> http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi? >> view=rev&revision=28794 >> >> User: guy >> Date: 2009/06/21 12:16 PM >> >> Log: >> "main_menu.[ch]" -> "menus.[ch]"; it handles not only the main >> menu, but >>

Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-commits] rev 28794: /trunk/gtk/ /trunk/gtk/: Makefile.common capture_dlg.c capture_file_dlg.c drag_and_drop.c file_dlg_win32.c fileset_dlg.c main.c main.h main_filter_to

2009-06-21 Thread Ulf Lamping
g...@wireshark.org schrieb: > http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=rev&revision=28794 > > User: guy > Date: 2009/06/21 12:16 PM > > Log: > "main_menu.[ch]" -> "menus.[ch]"; it handles not only the main menu, but > context menus. Which menus that are not part of the main window d

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Wireshark

2009-06-21 Thread Anders Broman
Hi, Wireshark can dissect BSSMAP over SCCP I beleve, we do have a BSS MAP dissector. Regards Anders _ Från: wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org [mailto:wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org] För Yi Huang Skickat: den 18 juni 2009 15:36 Till: wireshark-dev@wireshark.org Ämne: [Wireshar

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Meaning of packet_info.p2p_dir ?

2009-06-21 Thread Guy Harris
On Jun 19, 2009, at 5:29 PM, Michael Lum wrote: > I was thinking mainly in terms of SCCP. > > There are protocols on top of SCCP where the receiver/sender is > important. > > Currently the SCCP code is setting the direction to SENT for which > ever > point code originates the SCCP Connection Re

[Wireshark-dev] Excuse me, may I ask a question

2009-06-21 Thread 小伟 杨
Excuse me, may I ask a question? How can this software support muti-languages display or output, such as Chinese,?       yang xiaowei    

[Wireshark-dev] buildbot failure in Wireshark (development) on Windows-XP-x86

2009-06-21 Thread buildbot-no-reply
The Buildbot has detected a new failure of Windows-XP-x86 on Wireshark (development). Full details are available at: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/builders/Windows-XP-x86/builds/6371 Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/ Buildslave for this Build: windows-xp-x86 Build Reason

[Wireshark-dev] buildbot failure in Wireshark (development) on Windows-XP-Win64

2009-06-21 Thread buildbot-no-reply
The Buildbot has detected a new failure of Windows-XP-Win64 on Wireshark (development). Full details are available at: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/builders/Windows-XP-Win64/builds/735 Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/ Buildslave for this Build: windows-xp-win64 Build R