The Buildbot has detected a new failure of Windows-XP-x86 on Wireshark
(development).
Full details are available at:
http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/builders/Windows-XP-x86/builds/4
Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/
Buildslave for this Build: windows-xp-x86
Build Reason:
The Buildbot has detected a new failure of Ubuntu-7.10-x86-64 on Wireshark
(development).
Full details are available at:
http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/builders/Ubuntu-7.10-x86-64/builds/0
Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/
Buildslave for this Build: ubuntu-7.10-x86
Build
On Aug 31, 2009, at 5:41 PM, Stephen Fisher wrote:
>
> On Aug 31, 2009, at 4:42 PM, Guy Harris wrote:
>
>> Done. I've marked it as "OK", as I've run it successfully on SL.
>
> The wikidot site states that Wireshark version 1.2.1 is "OK" on Snow
> Leopard now.
Yes - that's what I said I changed.
On Aug 31, 2009, at 4:42 PM, Guy Harris wrote:
> Done. I've marked it as "OK", as I've run it successfully on SL.
The wikidot site states that Wireshark version 1.2.1 is "OK" on Snow
Leopard now. Aren't the the check-ins just done only available in SVN
and presumably in the next Wireshark
On Aug 31, 2009, at 2:04 AM, Stig Bjørlykke wrote:
> Does anyone know why this is a "Does not work" issue, and not a
> warning?
> I think we should fix this entry.
Done. I've marked it as "OK", as I've run it successfully on SL. The
checkin comment notes that it "Crashes with "failed to al
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 04:28:02PM +0200, Balint Reczey wrote:
> I think we should stay with the current policy of adding only bugfixes
> to the stable branch.
There have been minor non-bugfixes before - no need to be too strict.
IIRC, there have been changes to e.g. the list of supported capture
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 08:58:16PM +0200, Kovarththanan Rajaratnam wrote:
> Joerg Mayer wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 06:17:08PM +0200, Kovarththanan Rajaratnam wrote:
> >
> > Better you than me ;-) If I find the time, I'll fix one problem that
> > currently
> > prevents a cmake based build
On Aug 31, 2009, at 8:58 PM, Guy Harris wrote:
>
> On Aug 31, 2009, at 11:44 AM, Michael Tüxen wrote:
>
>> OK, what do you think about the following workaround:
>
> It should work, but I'd like to be able to use the same 1/4 second
> timeout in the 64-bit OS X version as well.
Me too.
>
> Check in
On Aug 31, 2009, at 11:44 AM, Michael Tüxen wrote:
> OK, what do you think about the following workaround:
It should work, but I'd like to be able to use the same 1/4 second
timeout in the 64-bit OS X version as well.
Check in your workaround, and I'll try to figure out how to detect
failur
Hi Guy,
OK, what do you think about the following workaround:
Index: dumpcap.c
===
--- dumpcap.c (revision 29584)
+++ dumpcap.c (working copy)
@@ -250,7 +250,11 @@
/*
* Timeout, in milliseconds, for reads from the stream of
On Aug 31, 2009, at 2:04 AM, Stig Bjørlykke wrote:
> According to http://snowleopard.wikidot.com/ Wireshark does not work
> on Snow Leopard because we are unable to read semi-large files. I
> suppose this will fail on every system, not only SL.
I suspect so.
They're presumably running the bina
On Aug 31, 2009, at 7:08 AM, Michael Tüxen wrote:
> I agree. I'm (slowly) trying to build Wireshark (and what it
> depends on) on a 64-bit SL system. Up to now I discovered a
> problem with dumpcap. Guy has a work around, which is not
> yet committed.
I have an idea of how to do a workaround - I
Hi
I reinstalled all the autotool using apt-get. And ./autogen.sh seems to
work fine after that. However when I run ./configure I get this error :
./configure: line 12294: syntax error near unexpected token `LIBGNUTLS,'
./configure: line 12294: ` PKG_CHECK_MODULES(LIBGNUTLS, gnutls >=
1.2.0,'
I
Hi Stig,
I agree. I'm (slowly) trying to build Wireshark (and what it
depends on) on a 64-bit SL system. Up to now I discovered a
problem with dumpcap. Guy has a work around, which is not
yet committed. I need to build the gtk stuff, up to now,
I verified tshark...
We could upgrade a buildslave t
To wireshark dev:
need some tips on how to go about this, i was hoping to revise the patch of
bug#3964..
anyways here's my problem.
RFC 2460 uses this, and i wish to make use of traffic class's 6bit and 2 1-bit
ECNs
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|Versi
Hi,
According to http://snowleopard.wikidot.com/ Wireshark does not work
on Snow Leopard because we are unable to read semi-large files. I
suppose this will fail on every system, not only SL.
Does anyone know why this is a "Does not work" issue, and not a warning?
I think we should fix this entr
> While trying to add an item in the proto tree using the command
>
> proto_tree_add_item(xyz_tree, hf_xyz_event_stream_id, tvb, offset + 2, -1,
> FALSE);
>
> I am getting the following error:
>
> [Dissector bug, protocol XYZ: proto.c:3009: failed assertion
> "DISSECTOR_ASSERT_NOT_REACHED"]
>
> But
Hi,
Le lundi 31 août 2009 à 12:15 +0530, Devlina a écrit :
>
> While trying to add an item in the proto tree using the command
>
> proto_tree_add_item(xyz_tree, hf_xyz_event_stream_id, tvb, offset + 2,
> -1, FALSE);
>
> I am getting the following error:
>
> [Dissector bug, protocol XYZ: proto
18 matches
Mail list logo
