What version of Wireshark is your development based on? When I start capturing
using Wireshark 1.2.6, a temporary file is created whose name is prefixed with
"wireshark", not "ether".
- Chris
From: wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org [wireshark-dev-boun
I think so too. Because I have installed version 1.3.4 about wireshark from
the page http://www.wireshark.org/download/src/all-versions/.
And it can run successfully. But my version still can't opened for some unknown
reason.
The description is attached.
Any suggestions, I wil be g
Bill Meier wrote:
> Gerald Combs wrote:
>> On 4/21/10 6:54 AM, Bill Meier wrote:
>>> I don't know much about Windows manifests so I don't know why it appears
>>> that /manifest needs to be explictly required and whether this is really
>>> the correct fix.
>> It looks like manifests aren't require
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 10:47:14AM -0400, Ed Beroset wrote:
> I may have missed it, but have we measured to see if this is worth optimizing
> in the first place?
I have some old callgrind log, where match_strval (for 58736 frames) is called
a lot:
from dissect_ieee80211 58,7k
from ieee_80211
Hi,
Have any one tried Wireshark with a PF_RING (from ntop) enabled libpcap?
If so any data on the performance?
Regards
Anders
___
Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list
Archives:http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-d
What you need depends on what you're trying to accomplish. What are you trying
to accomplish?
From: wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org
[mailto:wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org] On Behalf Of Wei
Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2010 10:18 PM
To: wireshark-dev@wireshark.org
Subject: [Wireshark-dev]
Looks like a capturing related problem to me. Do you have sufficient
privileges to capture? Is Winpcap installed?
From: wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org
[mailto:wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org] On Behalf Of lie zheng
Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2010 4:32 AM
To: wireshark-dev@wireshark.org
The Buildbot has detected a new failure of Windows-7-x64 on Wireshark
(development).
Full details are available at:
http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/builders/Windows-7-x64/builds/93
Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/
Buildslave for this Build: windows-7-x64
Build Reason:
Bu
The Buildbot has detected a new failure of Windows-XP-x86 on Wireshark
(development).
Full details are available at:
http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/builders/Windows-XP-x86/builds/81
Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/
Buildslave for this Build: windows-xp-x86
Build Reason:
Gerald Combs wrote:
> On 4/21/10 6:54 AM, Bill Meier wrote:
>> I don't know much about Windows manifests so I don't know why it appears
>> that /manifest needs to be explictly required and whether this is really
>> the correct fix.
>
> It looks like manifests aren't required with Visual C++ 2010
On 4/21/10 6:54 AM, Bill Meier wrote:
> I don't know much about Windows manifests so I don't know why it appears
> that /manifest needs to be explictly required and whether this is really
> the correct fix.
It looks like manifests aren't required with Visual C++ 2010:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/e
Anders Broman
>Use g_hastable_new_full() gint version and stuff the value_string into the
>hash table
>In proto_register, then have proto.c extract the value. Alternatively we could
>perhaps
>Pass a "get_value" function pointer?
> I'm not sure this will work :-)
I may have missed it, but have w
-Original Message-
From: wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org
[mailto:wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org] On Behalf Of Jakub Zawadzki
Sent: den 22 april 2010 15:40
To: Developer support list for Wireshark
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] RFC: sorted value_string + bsearch
On Tue, Apr 20, 2
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 11:43:49PM +0200, Anders Broman wrote:
> Would it be faster to use hash tables instead of very large
> value_strings? In diameter i think
> 3gpp AVP codes are in a value_string > 2k
I think main problem with hash tables, is that you need to have
big table, and good hash fu
Hi,
I am developing my wireshark plug-in to analyze our protocol. After I
finished building the source code of wireshark , there is a problem and the
details is as follows:
One error dialog box which displayed some information " The file
"C:\DOCUME~1\zheng\LOCALS~1\Temp\ether" could
15 matches
Mail list logo
