Re: [Wireshark-dev] libtshark + scripting language support

2010-08-20 Thread Thierry Emmanuel
Hello, I can briefly, according to the humble experience I have had with Wireshark, give some (technical) pros and cons about linking directly with libwireshark : - Advantages : Firstly, some features you can't access by the other way. You have the dissect tree under his native structure, so

[Wireshark-dev] buildbot failure in Wireshark (development) on OSX-10.6-x64

2010-08-20 Thread buildbot-no-reply
The Buildbot has detected a new failure of OSX-10.6-x64 on Wireshark (development). Full details are available at: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/builders/OSX-10.6-x64/builds/570 Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/ Buildslave for this Build: osx-10.6-x64 Build Reason:

[Wireshark-dev] buildbot failure in Wireshark (development) on OSX-10.5-x86

2010-08-20 Thread buildbot-no-reply
The Buildbot has detected a new failure of OSX-10.5-x86 on Wireshark (development). Full details are available at: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/builders/OSX-10.5-x86/builds/983 Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/ Buildslave for this Build: osx-10.5-x86 Build Reason:

[Wireshark-dev] buildbot failure in Wireshark (development) on Ubuntu-10.04-x64

2010-08-20 Thread buildbot-no-reply
The Buildbot has detected a new failure of Ubuntu-10.04-x64 on Wireshark (development). Full details are available at: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/builders/Ubuntu-10.04-x64/builds/419 Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/ Buildslave for this Build: ubuntu-10.04-x64 Build

[Wireshark-dev] buildbot failure in Wireshark (development) on OSX-10.5-PowerPC

2010-08-20 Thread buildbot-no-reply
The Buildbot has detected a new failure of OSX-10.5-PowerPC on Wireshark (development). Full details are available at: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/builders/OSX-10.5-PowerPC/builds/866 Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/ Buildslave for this Build: osx-10.5-ppc Build

[Wireshark-dev] Self compiled wireshark won't capture on Windows.

2010-08-20 Thread Andrew Feren
This has been going on for a month or few now. I have been successful building wireshark and packaging it on Windows for a while.  One day the executables I build started producing the following error: Runtime Error! Program: This application has requested the Runtime to terminate it in an

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Self compiled wireshark won't capture on Windows.

2010-08-20 Thread Graham Bloice
On 20/08/2010 15:09, Andrew Feren wrote: This has been going on for a month or few now. I have been successful building wireshark and packaging it on Windows for a while. One day the executables I build started producing the following error: Runtime Error! Program: This application has

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Self compiled wireshark won't capture on Windows.

2010-08-20 Thread Anders Broman
Hi, Silly question perhaps, but have you tried to do a distclean and rebuild? Regards Anders From: wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org [mailto:wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org] On Behalf Of Graham Bloice Sent: den 20 augusti 2010 16:14 To: Developer support

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Self compiled wireshark won't capture on Windows.

2010-08-20 Thread Andrew Feren
Anders for the win. I would have sworn I had tried a distclean, but I tried again and now everything is happy. Thanks! -Andrew Feren acfe...@yahoo.com --- On Fri, 8/20/10, Anders Broman anders.bro...@ericsson.com wrote: From: Anders Broman anders.bro...@ericsson.com Subject: Re:

Re: [Wireshark-dev] libtshark + scripting language support

2010-08-20 Thread Eloy Paris
Hi Mark, On 08/19/2010 03:12 PM, Mark Landriscina wrote: Eloy, I've picked up on two separate threads in this discussion. First is, does my approach work for me? I think that it does and I appreciate your comments on this topic. Second is,is there much utility is offering my code up as

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Memory leaks when using epan

2010-08-20 Thread Eloy Paris
Hi Thierry, On 08/20/2010 12:39 PM, Thierry Emmanuel wrote: Hello, As I wrote in some of my mails, I work on a project which made me to use the epan as a dissecting library, independently from the rest of the wireshark source. I have some troubles with memory handling. I have huge memory

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Memory leaks when using epan

2010-08-20 Thread Jeff Morriss
Thierry Emmanuel wrote: Hello, As I wrote in some of my mails, I work on a project which made me to use the epan as a dissecting library, independently from the rest of the wireshark source. I have some troubles with memory handling. I have huge memory leaks when I decode multicast

[Wireshark-dev] Update config.guess, config.sub

2010-08-20 Thread Albert Chin
Can someone update config.guess and config.sub for wireshark 1.0.x and 1.2.x branches? The versions currently present don't correctly recognize AIX 6. -- albert chin (ch...@thewrittenword.com) ___ Sent via:Wireshark-dev

[Wireshark-dev] buildbot failure in Wireshark 1.4 on OSX-10.6-x64

2010-08-20 Thread buildbot-no-reply
The Buildbot has detected a new failure of OSX-10.6-x64 on Wireshark 1.4. Full details are available at: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk-1.4/builders/OSX-10.6-x64/builds/68 Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk-1.4/ Buildslave for this Build: osx-10.6-x64 Build Reason: Build

[Wireshark-dev] buildbot failure in Wireshark 1.4 on OSX-10.5-x86

2010-08-20 Thread buildbot-no-reply
The Buildbot has detected a new failure of OSX-10.5-x86 on Wireshark 1.4. Full details are available at: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk-1.4/builders/OSX-10.5-x86/builds/65 Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk-1.4/ Buildslave for this Build: osx-10.5-x86 Build Reason: Build

[Wireshark-dev] buildbot failure in Wireshark 1.4 on Ubuntu-10.04-x64

2010-08-20 Thread buildbot-no-reply
The Buildbot has detected a new failure of Ubuntu-10.04-x64 on Wireshark 1.4. Full details are available at: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk-1.4/builders/Ubuntu-10.04-x64/builds/60 Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk-1.4/ Buildslave for this Build: ubuntu-10.04-x64 Build

[Wireshark-dev] buildbot failure in Wireshark 1.4 on Windows-7-x64

2010-08-20 Thread buildbot-no-reply
The Buildbot has detected a new failure of Windows-7-x64 on Wireshark 1.4. Full details are available at: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk-1.4/builders/Windows-7-x64/builds/64 Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk-1.4/ Buildslave for this Build: windows-7-x64 Build Reason:

[Wireshark-dev] buildbot failure in Wireshark 1.4 on Windows-XP-x86

2010-08-20 Thread buildbot-no-reply
The Buildbot has detected a new failure of Windows-XP-x86 on Wireshark 1.4. Full details are available at: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk-1.4/builders/Windows-XP-x86/builds/67 Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk-1.4/ Buildslave for this Build: windows-xp-x86 Build Reason:

[Wireshark-dev] buildbot failure in Wireshark 1.4 on OSX-10.5-PowerPC

2010-08-20 Thread buildbot-no-reply
The Buildbot has detected a new failure of OSX-10.5-PowerPC on Wireshark 1.4. Full details are available at: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk-1.4/builders/OSX-10.5-PowerPC/builds/50 Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk-1.4/ Buildslave for this Build: osx-10.5-ppc Build Reason:

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Decode As - adding payload decoding for the FLIP protocol

2010-08-20 Thread Guy Harris
On Aug 19, 2010, at 1:00 AM, Anders Broman wrote: Currently, the best way to handle this is probably to have a preference for FLIP that specifies the payload protocol; that preference would be an enum preference, listing the possible protocols. The dissectors for the protocols in

Re: [Wireshark-dev] libtshark + scripting language support

2010-08-20 Thread Guy Harris
On Aug 19, 2010, at 1:28 AM, Thierry Emmanuel wrote: I have worked very differently than you, considering Wireshark as a library itself. If you take a look at the epan directory, you'll see that you have all the tools you need to decode any kind of packet. You can : - Init the library

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Memory leaks when using epan

2010-08-20 Thread Guy Harris
On Aug 20, 2010, at 11:53 AM, Jeff Morriss wrote: The valgrind output shows that Valgrind thinks the ep_ and se_ allocated memory is being leaked. Sounds like you need to call ep_free_all() (after each packet) and se_free_all() (when the file is closed). Normally the former is done in