[Wireshark-dev] GTK 2.22 requires zlib 1.2.5(Windows)

2010-10-20 Thread Anders Broman
Hi, GTK 2.22 requires zlib 1.2.5 which is included in the bundle(I think) should we switch to use the included zlib rather than compiling from source as we are currently doing? Regards Anders ___ Sent via:Wireshark-dev mai

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Wireshark GUI development and release guidelines

2010-10-20 Thread Guy Harris
On Oct 19, 2010, at 1:53 PM, Joe wrote: > Thanks for the reply. (Which doesn't mean I'm the only person to respond to. If I reply to a question, it doesn't mean I'm the person who will handle the issue - others on the list might have more time, or more information, to respond. I suspect the

Re: [Wireshark-dev] GTK 2.22 requires zlib 1.2.5(Windows)

2010-10-20 Thread Graham Bloice
On 20/10/2010 09:47, Anders Broman wrote: > Hi, > GTK 2.22 requires zlib 1.2.5 which is included in the bundle(I think) should > we switch to use > the included zlib rather than compiling from source as we are currently doing? > Regards > Anders > Depends on what C runtime lib the zlib dll is lin

[Wireshark-dev] slow when loading big pcaps

2010-10-20 Thread cco
hi! why is wireshark so slow when loading up >500 MB pcaps? is there any configuration trick to speed this up? thanks! bye now! cristian ___ Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list Archives:http://www.wireshark.org/lists

Re: [Wireshark-dev] slow when loading big pcaps

2010-10-20 Thread Guy Harris
On Oct 20, 2010, at 3:42 AM, cco wrote: > why is wireshark so slow when loading up >500 MB pcaps? Are you saying that the time taken to read a file, as a function of the size of the file, is discontinuous, with a jump at about 500 MB? If so, it might be that the memory used by Wireshark for th

[Wireshark-dev] buildbot failure in Wireshark (development) on Windows-7-x64

2010-10-20 Thread buildbot-no-reply
The Buildbot has detected a new failure of Windows-7-x64 on Wireshark (development). Full details are available at: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/builders/Windows-7-x64/builds/199 Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/ Buildslave for this Build: windows-7-x64 Build Reason: B

Re: [Wireshark-dev] buildbot failure in Wireshark (development) on Ubuntu-10.04-x64

2010-10-20 Thread Bill Meier
buildbot-no-re...@wireshark.org wrote: > The Buildbot has detected a new failure of Ubuntu-10.04-x64 on Wireshark > (development). > Full details are available at: > http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/builders/Ubuntu-10.04-x64/builds/646 > > Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/ >

[Wireshark-dev] Problem Compiling Wireshark under Win32

2010-10-20 Thread Fox-Moore Ben
I've developed a dissector plugin under Linux, and now need to deploy it on Windows machines. I started trying to setup my environment on a Windows XP VM but when I get to step 2.2.7., I get a couple of errors. I had a "vcredist_x86.

Re: [Wireshark-dev] buildbot failure in Wireshark (development) on Ubuntu-10.04-x64

2010-10-20 Thread Jeff Morriss
Bill Meier wrote: buildbot-no-re...@wireshark.org wrote: The Buildbot has detected a new failure of Ubuntu-10.04-x64 on Wireshark (development). Full details are available at: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/builders/Ubuntu-10.04-x64/builds/646 Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/

[Wireshark-dev] question about capturing long message and packets.

2010-10-20 Thread Al
I am using a char tool and is sending a long xml message like 3 mb and the capture doesnt show any packets ~3m. if the packet is broken down to smaller sizes how do i tell on the capture if the data was actually captured? I am not sure if the receiving end received the message so that's why i am

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Problem Compiling Wireshark under Win32

2010-10-20 Thread Ed Beroset
Fox-Moore Ben wrote: >I had a "vcredist_x86.exe is missing" error which I fixed by download >vcredist_x86.exe and putting it in C:\wireshark-win32-libs, however I now get >another error: > >tools/win32-setup.sh: line 10: sed: command not found Here's the problem. If you look at tools/win32-setu

Re: [Wireshark-dev] buildbot failure in Wireshark (development) on Ubuntu-10.04-x64

2010-10-20 Thread Hadriel Kaplan
Ugh - my patch submitted as bug 5242 caused it. Sorry bout that. I didn't realize the bug was taken in yet (I had added myself to its cc list, but never got an email). -hadriel On Oct 20, 2010, at 10:28 AM, Jeff Morriss wrote: > Bill Meier wrote: >> buildbot-no-re...@wireshark.org wrote: >>

Re: [Wireshark-dev] buildbot failure in Wireshark (development) on Ubuntu-10.04-x64

2010-10-20 Thread Bill Meier
Hadriel Kaplan wrote: > Ugh - my patch submitted as bug 5242 caused it. Sorry bout that. > I didn't realize the bug was taken in yet (I had added myself to > its cc list, but never got an email). > > -hadriel > Not a problem: It turns out that the addition of ipfix.c to wiretap exposed a bug

Re: [Wireshark-dev] buildbot failure in Wireshark (development) on Ubuntu-10.04-x64

2010-10-20 Thread Bill Meier
Jeff Morriss wrote: > Bill Meier wrote: >> >> Capinfos getting an error when reading a file; >> >> Some issue with wiretap ipfix add doe recently ?? > > I started looking this morning too. The attached patch fixes the crash, > but there's more work to do: 1.4 correctly detects the file type. >

Re: [Wireshark-dev] buildbot failure in Wireshark (development) on Ubuntu-10.04-x64

2010-10-20 Thread Bill Meier
Bill Meier wrote: > > It turns out that the addition of ipfix.c to wiretap exposed a bug in > another wiretap reader (ascendtext.c) > as well as the bug in ipfix.c that Jeff identified. > > (ascendtext.c wasn't properly initializing *err before using it thus > depending on whatever value *err h

Re: [Wireshark-dev] buildbot failure in Wireshark (development) on Ubuntu-10.04-x64

2010-10-20 Thread Hadriel Kaplan
Yeah but I feel stupid because I actually found and fixed that bug in my local ipfix.c afterwards, and didn't go fix it in the bug-database entry. :( -hadriel On Oct 20, 2010, at 12:28 PM, Bill Meier wrote: > Hadriel Kaplan wrote: >> Ugh - my patch submitted as bug 5242 caused it. Sorry bout t

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Problem Compiling Wireshark under Win32

2010-10-20 Thread Jaap Keuter
On 10/20/2010 03:37 PM, Fox-Moore Ben wrote: > I’ve developed a dissector plugin under Linux, and now need to deploy it > on Windows machines. I started trying to setup my environment on a > Windows XP VM but when I get to step 2.2.7. > ,

Re: [Wireshark-dev] question about capturing long message and packets.

2010-10-20 Thread Jaap Keuter
On 10/20/2010 04:29 PM, Al wrote: > I am using a char tool and is sending a long xml message like 3 mb and the > capture doesnt show any packets ~3m. if the packet is broken down to smaller > sizes how do i tell on the capture if the data was actually captured? I am > not sure if the receiving e

Re: [Wireshark-dev] buildbot failure in Wireshark (development) on Ubuntu-10.04-x64

2010-10-20 Thread Jaap Keuter
Ok, Go sit in the penalty box for 20 CPU cycles. ;) Jaap On 10/20/2010 07:57 PM, Hadriel Kaplan wrote: > > Yeah but I feel stupid because I actually found and fixed that bug in my > local ipfix.c afterwards, and didn't go fix it in the bug-database entry. :( > -hadriel > > On Oct 20, 2010, at 1

[Wireshark-dev] buildbot failure in Wireshark (development) on Windows-XP-x86

2010-10-20 Thread buildbot-no-reply
The Buildbot has detected a new failure of Windows-XP-x86 on Wireshark (development). Full details are available at: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/builders/Windows-XP-x86/builds/1340 Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/ Buildslave for this Build: windows-xp-x86 Build Reason

[Wireshark-dev] buildbot failure in Wireshark (development) on Windows-7-x64

2010-10-20 Thread buildbot-no-reply
The Buildbot has detected a new failure of Windows-7-x64 on Wireshark (development). Full details are available at: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/builders/Windows-7-x64/builds/210 Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/ Buildslave for this Build: windows-7-x64 Build Reason: B