On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 09:27:29PM +0100, Joerg Mayer wrote:
> I was just surprised that this (small) fix wasn't backported to 1.2 as
> well but we list this as a known bug instead.
That's a good point; I've added it to the list for 1.2.14.
__
Oh yuk, that doesn't look nice. I'll have to go back to that layout design to
see where it goes wrong, and what to do about it.
Send from my iPhone
On 22 nov. 2010, at 11:05, Stig Bjørlykke wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 11:20 PM, wrote:
>> Log:
>> Add text import capability, like text2p
The Buildbot has detected a new failure of Windows-XP-x86 on Wireshark
(development).
Full details are available at:
http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/builders/Windows-XP-x86/builds/1597
Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/
Buildslave for this Build: windows-xp-x86
Build Reason
The Buildbot has detected a new failure of Windows-7-x64 on Wireshark
(development).
Full details are available at:
http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/builders/Windows-7-x64/builds/475
Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/
Buildslave for this Build: windows-7-x64
Build Reason:
B
The Buildbot has detected a new failure of OSX-10.5-x86 on Wireshark
(development).
Full details are available at:
http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/builders/OSX-10.5-x86/builds/1755
Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/
Buildslave for this Build: osx-10.5-x86
Build Reason:
Bui
The Buildbot has detected a new failure of OSX-10.6-x64 on Wireshark
(development).
Full details are available at:
http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/builders/OSX-10.6-x64/builds/1380
Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/
Buildslave for this Build: osx-10.6-x64
Build Reason:
Bui
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 08:07:33PM +1100, Andrew Hood wrote:
> >>Is it true that this bugfix hasn't been backported to 1.2.x?
> >
> >
> > I only listed it to be backported to 1.4 as 1.2 is the old stable.
>
> To get the window back:
> - right click the Wireshark entry in the task bar,
> - select
"Bill Meier" wrote:
> Without knowing the code, but given that print_update_dynamic() appears
> to be only used in file_dlg_win32.c I'd be inclined to remove the
> declaration from the .h file
>
> Any reason not to ?
That would be the best, sure.
--gv
On 11/22/2010 1:41 PM, Gisle Vanem wrote:
> print_update_dynamic() isn't defined 'static' in file_dlg_win32.h.
> Hence:
>
> --- gtk\file_dlg_win32.cSun Nov 21 04:04:45 2010
> +++ gtk\file_dlg_win32.c Mon Nov 22 13:54:53 2010
> @@ -886,7 +886,7 @@
> print_update_dynamic(dlg_hwnd, a
print_update_dynamic() isn't defined 'static' in file_dlg_win32.h.
Hence:
--- gtk\file_dlg_win32.cSun Nov 21 04:04:45 2010
+++ gtk\file_dlg_win32.c Mon Nov 22 13:54:53 2010
@@ -886,7 +886,7 @@
print_update_dynamic(dlg_hwnd, args);
}
-static void
+void
print_update_dynamic(HWND
Hi,
Reading up on treads I came across the following
http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users/200906/msg00209.html
And http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev/200611/msg00199.html
>we used to have 2 threads in the old ethereal for a short period. one thread
>for the main application an
Stephen Fisher wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 04:22:19PM +0100, Joerg Mayer wrote:
>
>
>>On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 12:24:08PM -0800, Gerald Combs wrote:
>>
>>>Known Problems
>>>
>>> Wireshark may appear offscreen on multi-monitor Windows systems.
>>> (Bug 553)
>>
>>Is it true that this bugfix
12 matches
Mail list logo