-Original Message-
From: wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org
[mailto:wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org] On Behalf Of Joerg Mayer
Sent: den 19 augusti 2011 07:23
To: Developer support list for Wireshark
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Brutal patch to build with GTK 3.0
On Thu, Aug 18, 20
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 04:13:10PM -0700, Gerald Combs wrote:
> The deprecated code has been removed in r38610 (I should have caught it
> a couple of years ago when updating airpcap_dlg.c).
Thanks!
> The AirPcap files and functions should be given more generic names, such
> as "main_wireless_tool
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 03:00:23PM +0200, Anders Broman wrote:
> With the enclosed patch Wireshark builds on GTK3.0. Colors are messed up etc
> but it should be possible to start to fix things and actually see what's
> happening.
> I wouldn't be surprised if many patches leading up to this are fa
In
http://ask.wireshark.org/questions/5726/newbie-trying-to-get-lua-scripts-to-execute
it says
Wireshark tries to load Lua files from all plugins directories
(specified in the Wireshark manual). The file extensions must be ".lua" (case
sensitive). Directories under plugins are
On Aug 18, 2011, at 2:08 PM, John x wrote:
> I am working on 1.4.4 now. So I do used dissector_add_port
> but after I put the generated .so file under
> /usr/lib/wireshark/plugins/1.4.1/, then I run wireshark, it shows:
>
> Couldn't load module /usr/lib/wireshark/plugins/1.4.4/xxx.so: underfin
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 05:55:43PM -0600, Stephen Fisher wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 06:31:56PM +0200, Anders Broman wrote:
>
> > I don't mind if some one commits the patch, but I think you have to
> > build with the new UI MANAGER on GTK 3.0 as there is quite a bit of
> > "factory" stuff
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 06:31:56PM +0200, Anders Broman wrote:
> I don't mind if some one commits the patch, but I think you have to
> build with the new UI MANAGER on GTK 3.0 as there is quite a bit of
> "factory" stuff left to fix. Unless we want to break the remaining
> statistics functions
On Aug 18, 2011, at 4:13 PM, Gerald Combs wrote:
> There's no reason to limit the ability to set the 802.11 channel et al
> to a subset of Windows users.
That'd be platform-dependent for now (until I get the chance to put APIs, and
implementations thereof, for channel-querying and channel-chang
On 8/18/11 1:46 PM, Stephen Fisher wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 10:30:40PM +0200, Joerg Mayer wrote:
>
>> I'd rather disable building with AIRPCAP. If this code is unmaintained
>> then this would be more appropriate.
>
> That code (should be) maintained like the rest of our regular GTK code,
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 03:55:02PM -0500, Mrunal Upadhyay wrote:
> Yes that is absolutely correct. It would have been great if the users
> can filter the packets from the UI screen itself just by filtering
> from the UI on the basis of the protocol value. And if I need to do it
> for a custom d
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 02:59:44PM -0600, Stephen Fisher wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 08:38:26PM +, jma...@wireshark.org wrote:
> > http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=rev&revision=38607
> >
> > User: jmayer
> > Date: 2011/08/18 01:38 PM
> >
> > Log:
> > When building wit
Hi,
I am working on 1.4.4 now. So I do used dissector_add_port
but after I put the generated .so file under /usr/lib/wireshark/plugins/1.4.1/,
then I run wireshark, it shows:
Couldn't load module /usr/lib/wireshark/plugins/1.4.4/xxx.so: underfined
symbol: dissector_add_port
Any advice?
Thank
On 18 aug. 2011, at 17:08, Graham Bloice wrote:
> On 18/08/2011 15:26, moussa.alaw...@zodiacaerospace.com wrote:
>> Can someone help me
>>
>>
>>
>> De :Moussa Alawieh/LES ULIS/ZDF/BTECH/ZODIAC
>>
>> -
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 08:38:26PM +, jma...@wireshark.org wrote:
> http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=rev&revision=38607
>
> User: jmayer
> Date: 2011/08/18 01:38 PM
>
> Log:
> When building with GTK3 we *must* use the ui-manager interface,
> the ItemFactory stuff doesn't
Hi
Yes that is absolutely correct. It would have been great if the users
can filter the packets from the UI screen itself just by filtering from
the UI on the basis of the protocol value. And if I need to do it for
a custom dissector are there any ways to do it?
Thank You,
From: Stephen Fis
On Aug 18, 2011, at 10:46 PM, Stephen Fisher wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 10:30:40PM +0200, Joerg Mayer wrote:
>
>> I'd rather disable building with AIRPCAP. If this code is unmaintained
>> then this would be more appropriate.
>
> That code (should be) maintained like the rest of our regul
On 08/18/2011 04:46 PM, Stephen Fisher wrote:
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 10:30:40PM +0200, Joerg Mayer wrote:
I'd rather disable building with AIRPCAP. If this code is unmaintained
then this would be more appropriate.
That code (should be) maintained like the rest of our regular GTK code,
except
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 10:30:40PM +0200, Joerg Mayer wrote:
> I'd rather disable building with AIRPCAP. If this code is unmaintained
> then this would be more appropriate.
That code (should be) maintained like the rest of our regular GTK code,
except that it just happens to only be built on Wi
If I understand correctly, you are proposing that Wireshark have the
ability to right click on the contents of the Protocol column and select
"Apply As Filter" then "Selected", which currently says "Could not
acquire information to build a filter! Try expanding or choosing
another item." which
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 04:15:23PM +, sfis...@wireshark.org wrote:
> http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=rev&revision=38606
>
> User: sfisher
> Date: 2011/08/18 09:15 AM
>
> Log:
> Temporary fix to get Windows build going again: undefine
> GTK_DISABLE_DEPRECATED if building
Dear All,
I have created a custom dissector that helps in dissecting the packets
belonging to that protocol. Now I have 2,3 protocols defined in the same plugin
file. Is it possible to filter the packets based on a specific protocol value
By right clicking on the protocol and applying it as fil
On Aug 17, 2011, at 10:37 AM, John x wrote:
> I am working on wireshark 1.7.0 (SVN from /trunk) ...
On Aug 18, 2011, at 12:38 PM, John x wrote:
> I tried both dissector_add_port() and dissector_add_uint(), but neither works.
>
> I am working on version 1.4.4
OK, which one are you working on -
Hi,
I tried both dissector_add_port() and dissector_add_uint(), but neither works.
I am working on version 1.4.4
anyone can tell me the reason?
Thanks
> Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2011 19:47:33 +0200
> From: jma...@loplof.de
> To: wireshark-dev@wireshark.org
> Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] why wireshar
On Aug 18, 2011, at 9:41 AM, Mrunal Upadhyay wrote:
> Is there a way to store a string in a temporary tvb buffer and then in the
> dissection logic use this tvb buffer in the in order to read this temporary
> string using function proto_tree_add_item and assign it to one of the filter
> fields
Jeff Morriss writes:
> On 08/18/2011 12:41 PM, Mrunal Upadhyay wrote:
> > Dear All,
> >
> > Is there a way to store a string in a temporary tvb buffer and then in
> > the dissection logic use this tvb buffer in the in order to read this
> > temporary string using function proto_tree_add_item and
On 08/18/2011 12:41 PM, Mrunal Upadhyay wrote:
Dear All,
Is there a way to store a string in a temporary tvb buffer and then in
the dissection logic use this tvb buffer in the in order to read this
temporary string using function proto_tree_add_item and assign it to one
of the filter fields.
S
Dear All,
Is there a way to store a string in a temporary tvb buffer and then in the
dissection logic use this tvb buffer in the in order to read this temporary
string using function proto_tree_add_item and assign it to one of the filter
fields.
The reason for creating a temporary buffer is be
Stephen Fisher skrev 2011-08-18 18:24:
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 03:00:23PM +0200, Anders Broman wrote:
With the enclosed patch Wireshark builds on GTK3.0. Colors are messed
up etc but it should be possible to start to fix things and actually
see what's happening. I wouldn't be surprised if many
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 03:00:23PM +0200, Anders Broman wrote:
> With the enclosed patch Wireshark builds on GTK3.0. Colors are messed
> up etc but it should be possible to start to fix things and actually
> see what's happening. I wouldn't be surprised if many patches leading
> up to this are
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 08:19:45PM +0200, Joerg Mayer wrote:
> Can the maintainers of the AIRPCAP code please have a look at this?
I reluctantly committed a temporary workaround that undefines
GTK_DISABLE_DEPRECATED if building on Windows to get the Windows build
going again:
http://anonsvn.
On 18/08/2011 15:26, moussa.alaw...@zodiacaerospace.com wrote:
> Can someone help me
>
>
>
> De :Moussa Alawieh/LES ULIS/ZDF/BTECH/ZODIAC
>
> --
>
>
> thanks for your response
>
> However, what you
On 08/18/2011 10:10 AM, moussa.alaw...@zodiacaerospace.com wrote:
thanks for your response
However, what you said is very importanty for me because I have put this
function in many place of my code
Is there any other function that can replace the "proto_tree_add_text()" ??
Yes: any o
Can someone help me
De :Moussa Alawieh/LES ULIS/ZDF/BTECH/ZODIAC
A : Developer support list for Wireshark
Date : 18/08/2011 16:10
Objet : Re: [Wireshark-dev] can't filter field in wireshark
thanks for your response
However, what you said is very importanty for me be
On 17/08/2011 20:53, t...@execpc.com wrote:
> Gents ---
> 17 August 2011 ---
>
> I just installed Wireshark on my computer, and, this is the
> first time I've ever used something like this. I don't quite
> know what I doing yet.
>
> I've attached a screen shot of what's happened. I was able to
>
Gents ---
17 August 2011 ---
I just installed Wireshark on my computer, and, this is the
first time I've ever used something like this. I don't quite
know what I doing yet.
I've attached a screen shot of what's happened. I was able to
check for "promiscuous" mode in Wireshark (but I haven't th
thanks for your response
However, what you said is very importanty for me because I have put this
function in many place of my code
Is there any other function that can replace the "proto_tree_add_text()"
??
and do you think that it exist a way to satisfy my question in the
precedent
writes:
> I put the result in Wireshark with the
> "proto_tree_add_text"
> function, but it's impossible
> to filter this field because it's a text !
> can someone help-me ???
> regards
Don't use proto_tree_add_text(). To quote doc/README.developer:
proto_tree_add_text() is used to add a
Hi,
With the enclosed patch Wireshark builds on GTK3.0. Colors are messed up etc
but it should be possible to start to fix things and actually see what's
happening.
I wouldn't be surprised if many patches leading up to this are faulty. Color
handling should probably be rewritten to use GdkRGBA
Hello,
I have got a problem in developping my wireshark's plugin in order to
decommute my protocol.
The problem is that :
In my protocol, I have a "Time" field, and I have to add the value of this
"Time" fild to the value of the field of the "Frame" protocol :"Arrival
Time".
I put the result i
39 matches
Mail list logo
