Re: [Wireshark-dev] Wireshark support for TinyOS packet format

2011-11-10 Thread vijay
BUMP. Any pointer would be really helpful thanks On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 1:34 PM, vijay wrote: > Hi, > > Could some one tell me if wireshark can analyze packets from a TelosB mote > (802.15.4 traffic) that uses TinyOS. > Existing information are pretty old and says that tinyos packet format is

[Wireshark-dev] Wireshark support for TinyOS packet format

2011-11-10 Thread vijay
Hi, Could some one tell me if wireshark can analyze packets from a TelosB mote (802.15.4 traffic) that uses TinyOS. Existing information are pretty old and says that tinyos packet format is different from what Wireshark expects. I was wondering if newer versions of wireshark has the ability to ana

Re: [Wireshark-dev] RSASSA-PSS (bug #6541)

2011-11-10 Thread Anders Broman
Hi, Some quick comments >Should all of this go into asn1/pkcs1? I guess so as other definitions from >RFC5912 are in the same file. Yes probably, (haven't looked at the RFC:s) >It looks like the default values are ignored. There's no errors from asn2wrs >but the defaults never show up anywhere,

Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-commits] rev 39775: /trunk/ /trunk/: CMakeLists.txt dumpcap.c

2011-11-10 Thread Michael Tüxen
On Nov 10, 2011, at 7:58 AM, Jaap Keuter wrote: > On Wed, 9 Nov 2011 23:58:13 +0100, Michael Tüxen wrote: >> On Nov 9, 2011, at 10:30 PM, Guy Harris wrote: >> >>> >>> On Nov 9, 2011, at 1:09 PM, Bill Meier wrote: >>> Any reason not to remove all the 'if (use_threads)' tests (just leaving

[Wireshark-dev] RSASSA-PSS (bug #6541)

2011-11-10 Thread Martin Kaiser
Dear all, I'm trying to add support for RSASSA-PSS signatures in X.509 certificates. It's in a state where things are working for me, but I'm not sure that I understood the ASN.1 handling in wireshark well enough. Could anybody who's familiar with ANS.1 dissection spare some minutes and look at #