On Jan 6, 2012, at 6:15 AM, Roland Knall wrote:
Ok, let me clarify the idea. Let's for instance say, that you want to
have a graphical representation of the inner-workings of a
communication of two machines.
BTW, you're not thinking of something such as what you can get from the
Statistics
Hi
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 10:38 AM, Guy Harris g...@alum.mit.edu wrote:
On Jan 6, 2012, at 6:15 AM, Roland Knall wrote:
Ok, let me clarify the idea. Let's for instance say, that you want to
have a graphical representation of the inner-workings of a
communication of two machines.
BTW,
On Jan 11, 2012, at 2:02 AM, Roland Knall wrote:
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 10:38 AM, Guy Harris g...@alum.mit.edu wrote:
On Jan 6, 2012, at 6:15 AM, Roland Knall wrote:
Ok, let me clarify the idea. Let's for instance say, that you want to
have a graphical representation of the
On Jan 6, 2012, at 7:46 AM, Graham Bloice wrote:
I've also wondered about moving on from nmake and converting to MSBuild.
This is only usable from VS2008 or later though. Any thoughts on that?
If we do so, can we continue to have lists of source files in Makefile.common,
rather than, say,
-Original Message-
From: wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org [mailto:wireshark-dev-
boun...@wireshark.org] On Behalf Of Guy Harris
Sent: 11 January 2012 10:59
To: Developer support list for Wireshark
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Windows build environment
On Jan 6, 2012, at
Balint Reczey balint.rec...@ericsson.com
wrote in news:4f09f7b3.2000...@ericsson.com:
Hi,
I have run tools/git-compare-abis.sh on latest master-1.6
(wireshark-1.6.4-21-ga6c3642).
The ABI is almost totally stable [1], which is very good sign for
plugin developers and for anyone using
I'm new to the list. In searching through the archives, I've noticed that
there have been several cases where people have successfully cross-compiled
Wireshark (or actually, tshark) for the Android platform. I've been attempting
to do this, but without success. Would anyone that has been
Hello,
I'm really exited to see the birth of Qt4 front-end for Wireshark !
Do you have a roadmap ?
Is it to early to propose patches ( CMake integration for example ) ?
My small personal wish-list status
CMake : done
Qt4 : in progress
switch to Mercurial/Git : not yet
/wish-list
Hsivank
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 11:25 AM, Guy Harris g...@alum.mit.edu wrote:
On Jan 11, 2012, at 2:02 AM, Roland Knall wrote:
The same goes for the Conversation List, IO Graph as well as the
Endpoint List. Also, following a specific conversation could be
tricky.
That just sounds like insufficient
On 1/10/12 2:29 PM, Gerald Combs wrote:
On 1/10/12 2:09 PM, Balint Reczey wrote:
diff --git a/debian/wireshark-common.files b/debian/wireshark-common.files
index 41341be..4403c04 100644
--- a/debian/wireshark-common.files
+++ b/debian/wireshark-common.files
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
I was curious about the code being being generated by the Windows
compiler for the g_?to? macros so I used the /FAs option to generate a
listing which contained the assembly code for one of the dissectors.
Upon examining the code, I found it to be rather inefficient.
Upon poking around a bit,
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 11:23:21AM -, Graham Bloice wrote:
On Jan 6, 2012, at 7:46 AM, Graham Bloice wrote:
I've also wondered about moving on from nmake and converting to
MSBuild. This is only usable from VS2008 or later though. Any thoughts
on
that?
If we do so, can we
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 05:00:57PM +, ger...@wireshark.org wrote:
http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=revrevision=40436
User: gerald
Date: 2012/01/11 09:00 AM
Log:
Have make-version.pl -v update the library revision information for
libwireshark and libwiretap. The
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 4:31 PM, Joerg Mayer jma...@loplof.de wrote:
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 05:00:57PM +, ger...@wireshark.org wrote:
http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=revrevision=40436
User: gerald
Date: 2012/01/11 09:00 AM
Log:
Have make-version.pl -v update the
14 matches
Mail list logo
