Re: [Wireshark-dev] Adding features in VOIP analysis

2012-04-11 Thread Arif Hossain
Ok, what about exporting to mysql database instead of CSV? This is a worthy addition i guess. It will really turn wireshark into VOIP monitoring tool for large networks. I can create reports from mysql db. Excel is ugly as hell for a programmer. On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 1:40 PM, RUOFF, LARS (LARS)

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Adding features in VOIP analysis

2012-04-11 Thread Jakub Zawadzki
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 05:37:48PM +0600, Arif Hossain wrote: Ok, what about exporting to mysql database instead of CSV? This is a worthy addition i guess. It will really turn wireshark into VOIP monitoring tool for large networks. I can create reports from mysql db. Excel is ugly as hell for

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Adding features in VOIP analysis

2012-04-11 Thread Arif Hossain
Its always easy to directly insert the stat into my own schema. i don't think this is a very tough job. If dev community helps me with it, i wanna develop it myself. the developer guide is mainly helpful if i wanna write a new protocol disector, not for this kind of work. so a little help from

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Adding features in VOIP analysis

2012-04-11 Thread Guy Harris
On Apr 11, 2012, at 4:37 AM, Arif Hossain wrote: Ok, what about exporting to mysql database instead of CSV? (Perhaps better stated as in addition to CSV, in that you won't be *removing* the ability to export to CSV.) This is a worthy addition i guess. Yes, as long as it doesn't have a

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Adding features in VOIP analysis

2012-04-11 Thread Graham Bloice
-Original Message- From: wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org [mailto:wireshark-dev- boun...@wireshark.org] On Behalf Of Guy Harris Sent: 11 April 2012 16:52 To: Developer support list for Wireshark Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Adding features in VOIP analysis On Apr 11, 2012,

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Wireshark User Guide Typo

2012-04-11 Thread Jaap Keuter
Hi, So noted, fixed in r42024. Thanks, Jaap On 02/17/2012 05:21 PM, Engr. Paul-Marc E. Bougharios wrote: Dear Sirs, I was reading the greatly interesting User Guide of Wireshark (wonderful job, thus far!), and I noticed that there was a small typo, on page 14 (Page 4 following the ToC): In

Re: [Wireshark-dev] h.261 header parsing bug

2012-04-11 Thread Jaap Keuter
Hi, Can you test this instead? /* MBAP 2nd octet, 4 bits, 3rd octet 1 bit */ proto_tree_add_uint( h261_tree, hf_h261_mbap, tvb, offset, 1, ( tvb_get_ntohs( tvb, offset ) 0x0F80 ) 7 ); If this works please file a bug report in Bugzilla.