On Oct 17, 2012, at 2:22 PM, Anders Broman a.bro...@bredband.net wrote:
Guy Harris skrev 2012-10-17 22:13:
On Oct 17, 2012, at 12:35 PM, Anders Broman a.bro...@bredband.net wrote:
One use case is a internal version which would be nice to be able to
install co-existing with a
release
-Original Message-
From: wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org
[mailto:wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org] On Behalf Of Guy Harris
Sent: den 18 oktober 2012 08:11
To: Developer support list for Wireshark
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] r45615: Read the program name rather than
hardcoding
On Oct 18, 2012, at 12:51 AM, Anders Broman anders.bro...@ericsson.com wrote:
From unistall.nsi
:Section /o Un.Personal Settings un.SecPersonalSettings
;---
SectionIn 2
SetShellVarContext current
Delete $APPDATA\${PROGRAM_NAME}\*.*
RMDir
-Original Message-
From: wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org [mailto:wireshark-dev-
boun...@wireshark.org] On Behalf Of Evan Huus
Sent: 17 October 2012 17:57
To: Wireshark Developer List
Subject: [Wireshark-dev] Add date to release notes
I recently wanted to find out when a
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 10:09:03AM +0100, Graham Bloice wrote:
One way to see release dates is to query the svn repo (...)
or check last modified date @
http://www.wireshark.org/download/src/all-versions/
Stil I think it'd be good to have release dates in relnotes.
2012/10/18 Jakub Zawadzki darkjames...@darkjames.pl:
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 10:09:03AM +0100, Graham Bloice wrote:
One way to see release dates is to query the svn repo (...)
or check last modified date @
http://www.wireshark.org/download/src/all-versions/
Stil I think it'd be good to
On 2012-10-18 11:17, Jakub Zawadzki wrote:
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 10:09:03AM +0100, Graham Bloice wrote:
One way to see release dates is to query the svn repo (...)
or check last modified date @
http://www.wireshark.org/download/src/all-versions/
Or check the wiki:
-Original Message-
From: wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org
[mailto:wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org] On Behalf Of Guy Harris
Sent: den 18 oktober 2012 10:13
To: Developer support list for Wireshark
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] r45615: Read the program name rather than
hardcoding
1) Start capture on an interface
2) Stop the capture
3) Restart the capture
4) Press continue without saving
5) Wireshark dies at this moment
Regards
Anders
___
Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list
Ooops there is also
System: Linux 2.6.27.42-0.1-pae #1 SMP 2010-01-06 16:07:25 +0100 i686
X Vendor: The X.Org Foundation
X Vendor Release: 10502000
Selinux: No
Accessibility: Disabled
GTK+ Theme: Gilouche
Icon Theme: Gilouche
Memory status: size: 232710144 vsize: 232710144 resident:
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 11:22:18AM +, Anders Broman wrote:
1) Start capture on an interface
2) Stop the capture
3) Restart the capture
4) Press continue without saving
5) Wireshark dies at this moment
Can you try reverting r45511?
-Original Message-
From: wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org
[mailto:wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org] On Behalf Of Jakub Zawadzki
Sent: den 18 oktober 2012 15:13
To: Developer support list for Wireshark
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Getting reports of Crashes on recent SVN builds
Yes,
I can't reproduce the crash after reverting r45511
Regards
Anders
-Original Message-
From: wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org
[mailto:wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org] On Behalf Of Anders Broman
Sent: den 18 oktober 2012 15:20
To: Developer support list for Wireshark
Subject:
On Oct 18, 2012, at 4:18 AM, Anders Broman anders.bro...@ericsson.com wrote:
I changed most occurrences in the nsi installer of wireshark to
${PROGRAM_NAME} and also in some places of
Makefile.nmake in error as it now seems. So at least as convention (on
windows) we used
Hi,
Thus wrote Maynard, Chris (christopher.mayn...@gtech.com):
Recently, I found and fixed some of these problems, but obviously I
didn't catch them all. Are there any more thoughts about changing
tvb_length_remaining() and tvb_reported_length_remaining() to return 0
instead of -1?
it
-Original Message-
From: wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org [mailto:wireshark-dev-
boun...@wireshark.org] On Behalf Of Martin Kaiser
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2012 5:11 PM
To: wireshark-dev@wireshark.org
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-commits] rev 45566:
TL;DR - Jakub recently proposed a few changes to emem [1]. While I
think they are a very good idea, I believe that in the long term the
current emem design has too many fundamental limitations to make it
worth adapting for our future needs. I propose that it should be
gradually deprecated in
17 matches
Mail list logo
