And here's another one that's weird. Gerald, can you reproduce running manually
on the build bots?
On 2013-06-22, at 5:33 PM, buildbot-no-re...@wireshark.org wrote:
> The Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder Windows-7-x64 while
> building Wireshark (development).
> Full details are av
On Jun 22, 2013, at 11:08 AM, Fabio Tarabelloni
wrote:
> Does Wireshark have a Timeline permits to display graphical packets history ?
What do you mean by "history" here? There's the I/O Graph function, but it
might not do what you're asking for.
What sort of graphical display would the tim
Does Wireshark have a Timeline permits to display graphical packets history
?
Fabio.
___
Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list
Archives:http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mai
thanks Evan for your suggestion. I solved with custom decode function. I
used abs_time_secs_to_str (value, ABSOLUTE_TIME_LOCAL, TRUE) function where
value is the uint32 seconds value.
Fabio.
___
Sent via:Wireshark-dev mail
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 06/22/2013 09:43 AM, Bálint Réczey wrote:
> Hi Marc,
>
> 2013/6/22 Marc Petit-Huguenin :
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256
>>
>> On 06/22/2013 03:47 AM, Bálint Réczey wrote:
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> 2013/6/21 Marc Petit-Huguenin :
>
Hi Marc,
2013/6/22 Marc Petit-Huguenin :
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> On 06/22/2013 03:47 AM, Bálint Réczey wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> 2013/6/21 Marc Petit-Huguenin :
>>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256
>>>
>>> On 06/20/2013 04:52 PM, Guy Harris wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 06/22/2013 03:47 AM, Bálint Réczey wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> 2013/6/21 Marc Petit-Huguenin :
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256
>>
>> On 06/20/2013 04:52 PM, Guy Harris wrote:
>>>
>>> On Jun 20, 2013, at 2:58 PM, Marc Petit-Huguenin
Hi Balint,
Thus wrote Bálint Réczey (bal...@balintreczey.hu):
> We can relax the rules for Core Developers to let them bypass the peer review,
> but I did not want to include this exception in the first proposal.
> Speaking of myself I would be OK with requiring peer review for all my
> commits,
On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 12:03 PM, Bálint Réczey wrote:
> Hi Martin,
>
> 2013/6/22 Martin Kaiser :
>> Thus wrote Bálint Réczey (bal...@balintreczey.hu):
>>
>>> I have started describing a Gerrit based workflow which IMO would fit
>>> to the project at http://wiki.wireshark.org/Development/Workflow
Hi Martin,
2013/6/22 Martin Kaiser :
> Thus wrote Bálint Réczey (bal...@balintreczey.hu):
>
>> I have started describing a Gerrit based workflow which IMO would fit
>> to the project at http://wiki.wireshark.org/Development/Workflow .
>> Please check it and share your opinion.
>
> would that mean
Thanks for testing it, this is very odd...
On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 11:33 AM, Pascal Quantin
wrote:
> Hi Evan,
>
> I could not reproduce it either on my Windows XP box.
>
> Regards,
> Pascal.
>
>
>
> 2013/6/22 Evan Huus
>>
>> Running
>>
>> ./wmem_test --verbose --seed=R02S7c3c1e743f8aa20695f4377c
On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 11:29 AM, Fabio Tarabelloni
wrote:
> I can't use BASE_CUSTOM with FT_ABSOLUTE_TIME field because the compiler
> returns this error:
> Err Field 'UTC Time' has a 'strings' value but is of type FT_ABSOLUTE_TIME
> (which is not allowed to have strings)
>
> So I think I have
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 06/20/2013 02:58 PM, Marc Petit-Huguenin wrote:
> On 06/20/2013 02:17 PM, Gerald Combs wrote:
>> The following subjects came up during developer discussions at Sharkfest
>> this year:
>
>
> [...]
>
>> Git (cue ominous music). I managed to inst
Hi Evan,
I could not reproduce it either on my Windows XP box.
Regards,
Pascal.
2013/6/22 Evan Huus
> Running
>
> ./wmem_test --verbose --seed=R02S7c3c1e743f8aa20695f4377c8b1c40c8
>
> Should produce exactly the same run (with the same output and
> hopefully the same crash) as the buildbot saw
I can't use BASE_CUSTOM with FT_ABSOLUTE_TIME field because the compiler
returns this error:
Err Field 'UTC Time' has a 'strings' value but is of type
FT_ABSOLUTE_TIME (which is not allowed to have strings)
So I think I have to set a FT_UINT32 with BASE_CUSTOM and decode function
but I don't kno
The problem really boils down to how objects are destroyed.
In C, you simply call free().
In C++, you have to:
- check if there are any complete class instances contained in your
class, and recursively destroy them
- check the vtable and call the appropriate destructor functions (more
than one wh
Thus wrote Bálint Réczey (bal...@balintreczey.hu):
> I have started describing a Gerrit based workflow which IMO would fit
> to the project at http://wiki.wireshark.org/Development/Workflow .
> Please check it and share your opinion.
would that mean that even the most basic change needs peer revi
Running
./wmem_test --verbose --seed=R02S7c3c1e743f8aa20695f4377c8b1c40c8
Should produce exactly the same run (with the same output and
hopefully the same crash) as the buildbot saw.
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 1:33 AM, Graham Bloice
wrote:
> OK for me also on XP x32, although I'm not sure how to f
You could use a BASE_CUSTOM field, though that might be a bit overkill
for this situation. I'm not sure what other options are available.
Evan
On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 10:33 AM, Fabio Tarabelloni
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I need more information about FT_ABSOLUTE_TIME. I have a 32-bits field
> matches a U
Hi,
I need more information about FT_ABSOLUTE_TIME. I have a 32-bits field
matches a UTC time with a small peculiarity. I'd like to map the 0x
value to "Now" string.
Fabio.
___
Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list
Hi All,
2013/6/21 Marc Petit-Huguenin :
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> On 06/20/2013 04:52 PM, Guy Harris wrote:
>>
>> On Jun 20, 2013, at 2:58 PM, Marc Petit-Huguenin
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 06/20/2013 02:17 PM, Gerald Combs wrote:
>>>
Advantates: - I'm not sure that an
21 matches
Mail list logo
