On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 5:56 PM, Matthieu Patou wrote:
> On 10/30/2013 12:07 PM, Evan Huus wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 2:20 PM, Matthieu Patou wrote:
>>>
>>> On 10/30/2013 07:31 AM, Evan Huus wrote:
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 4:14 AM, Matthieu Patou wrote:
>
> Hello,
Didier skrev 2013-10-31 20:34:
Hi,
On Thu, 31 Oct 2013 11:57:35 +, Anders Broman wrote
Are wireshark's developers interested in reviewing and committing these
patches?
reviewing ,yes certainly . Committing, depends I suspect :-)
-1 Base on Yami's work "snapshot feature: apply filter upon
I configured BOINC to respect if "make" is running at my Gentoo Linux.
But when I do specify just "-j2" for a make process, then 2 BOINC tasks
could/should run too in parallel at my 4 core cpu, or ?
--
MfG/Sincerely
Toralf Förster
pgp finger print: 7B1A 07F4 EC82 0F90 D4C2 8936 872A E508 7DB6 9D
Hi,
On Thu, 31 Oct 2013 11:57:35 +, Anders Broman wrote
> > Are wireshark's developers interested in reviewing and committing these
patches?
>
> reviewing ,yes certainly . Committing, depends I suspect :-)
>
> >-1 Base on Yami's work "snapshot feature: apply filter upon previous
displayed pac
On 10/30/2013 03:51 PM, Jeff Morriss wrote:
> Yes. Toralf's email was significantly delayed (presumably because he's
> not subscribed to the list) waiting for the donuts to be made[1].
>
Yeah - isn't there a way to be subscribed but not get all "other" mail ?
I'm asking because I do follow the
Hi,
a problem has occurred with decoding reassembled fragments lately. I've
searched the FAQ and mailing lists but found nothing about it.
When the last fragment of a datagram would be reassembled in frame x but
another fragment of a next datagram would start in the same frame x, the entry
of
On 10/30/2013 07:25 AM, Anders Broman wrote:
-Original Message-
From: wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org
[mailto:wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org] On Behalf Of Matthieu Patou
Sent: den 30 oktober 2013 09:15
To: Developer support list for Wireshark
Subject: [Wireshark-dev] multiple
On 10/30/2013 07:31 AM, Evan Huus wrote:
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 4:14 AM, Matthieu Patou wrote:
Hello,
I noticed long time ago that wireshark is parsing the same packet at least 3
tree times.
To make it worse if I go back and forth to the same packet it will be
dissected one more time.
With c
> Are wireshark's developers interested in reviewing and committing these
> patches?
reviewing ,yes certainly . Committing, depends I suspect :-)
>-1 Base on Yami's work "snapshot feature: apply filter upon previous displayed
>packets only" (without the SAT, only using a true table). help a lot
Hi,
Years ago for our internal use I made a lot of speed related changes to
wireshark (then ethereal).
Some of these changes are currently in wireshark but many aren't.
Lately I'm looking at qt work and I'd like to move our internal tool to it.
A simple merge is DOA, vs our wireshark version the
10 matches
Mail list logo
