Hi Guy,
Thank you fixing this issue with PEEKREMOTE dissector.
When could we possibly expect the next build with this fix included, so that we
can give it a try with our setup and resolve our bug for the same.
Thanks,
Vignesh
From: bugzilla-dae...@wireshark.org [mailto:bugzilla-dae...@wireshar
On 6/8/14, 2:10 PM, Richard Sharpe wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I notice that there is a master-1.12 branch and a v1.12.0-rc1 tag, but
> neither of them seem to have the recent fixes for the spnego
> dissector.
>
> How/when would these get into a release branch?
The easiest way is to pull up the revie
Hi folks,
I notice that there is a master-1.12 branch and a v1.12.0-rc1 tag, but
neither of them seem to have the recent fixes for the spnego
dissector.
How/when would these get into a release branch?
--
Regards,
Richard Sharpe
(何以解憂？唯有杜康。--曹操)
__
Ok, I'm fine with removing them. In Debian they are needed by netexpect.
BTW may I ask why are they not welcomed?
2014.06.08. 22:43, "Joerg Mayer" ezt írta:
> On Sun, Jun 08, 2014 at 03:32:12PM +, Wireshark code review wrote:
> > URL:
> https://code.wireshark.org/review/gitweb?p=wireshark.git
On Sun, Jun 08, 2014 at 03:32:12PM +, Wireshark code review wrote:
> URL:
> https://code.wireshark.org/review/gitweb?p=wireshark.git;a=commit;h=97e1491aa8f418a7f5bd7fdd92561d2403c187f6
> Submitter: Balint Reczey (bal...@balintreczey.hu)
> Changed: branch: master
> Repository: wireshark
>
> Co
