On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 9:08 PM, Evan Huus wrote:
> (sorry Balint for the double-post, I don't know why my "reply" button
> dropped the mailing list)
>
>
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: Evan Huus
> Date: Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 9:05 PM
> Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] tvb allocator
(sorry Balint for the double-post, I don't know why my "reply" button
dropped the mailing list)
-- Forwarded message --
From: Evan Huus
Date: Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 9:05 PM
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] tvb allocator (was: Re: [Wireshark-commits]
master b6d20a2: Optimize reseting epa
2014-07-12 0:07 GMT+02:00 Anders Broman :
>
> Den 11 jul 2014 23:13 skrev "Bálint Réczey" :
>
>
>>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> Please provide the input data for letting others reproduce the results
>> or perform the performance tests on pcap files already available to
>> the public
>
> Ok I'll see if we can u
Hi Evan,
2014-07-11 23:51 GMT+02:00 Evan Huus :
> On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 5:12 PM, Bálint Réczey
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> Please provide the input data for letting others reproduce the results
>> or perform the performance tests on pcap files already available to
>> the public.
>>
>> I'm not
On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 6:07 PM, Anders Broman wrote:
>
> Den 11 jul 2014 23:13 skrev "Bálint Réczey" :
>
> >
> > Hi All,
> >
> > Please provide the input data for letting others reproduce the results
> > or perform the performance tests on pcap files already available to
> > the public
>
> Ok I'
On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 4:08 PM, Evan Huus wrote:
> The biggest win, I think, would be if we can avoid calling free_chain at
> all because tvbs are always allocated in the right scope and so get freed
> automatically. I think this would involve touching every place that creates
> new tvbs backed
Den 11 jul 2014 23:13 skrev "Bálint Réczey" :
>
> Hi All,
>
> Please provide the input data for letting others reproduce the results
> or perform the performance tests on pcap files already available to
> the public
Ok I'll see if we can use something from the wiki instead.
>
> I'm not a fan of i
On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 5:12 PM, Bálint Réczey
wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Please provide the input data for letting others reproduce the results
> or perform the performance tests on pcap files already available to
> the public.
>
> I'm not a fan of implementing custom memory management methods because
Hi All,
Please provide the input data for letting others reproduce the results
or perform the performance tests on pcap files already available to
the public.
I'm not a fan of implementing custom memory management methods because
partly because I highly doubt we can beat jemalloc easily on
perfor
On 7/11/2014 3:09 PM, Evan Huus wrote:
On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 12:42 PM, Bill Meier
I missed that ...
Thanks
___
Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list
Archives:http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscri
On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 12:42 PM, Bill Meier wrote:
> I've been working with the current 'pre-commit' and have noticed the
> following issues:
>
> 1. Using the current pre-commit which calls checkAPIs, etc, it
> doesn't seem possible to make changes to
> certain files (e.g., wsgetopt.c)
On 7/7/14 9:10 PM, Evan Huus wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 6, 2014 at 12:59 PM, Alexis La Goutte
> mailto:alexis.lagou...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jul 5, 2014 at 11:49 PM, Evan Huus > It would be nice to have different tags for Refs-Bug and
> Fixes-Bug, and have
> > the bugzilla inte
The biggest win, I think, would be if we can avoid calling free_chain at
all because tvbs are always allocated in the right scope and so get freed
automatically. I think this would involve touching every place that creates
new tvbs backed with glib memory though...
I will try and think about this
On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 4:03 PM, Gerald Combs wrote:
> On 7/7/14 9:10 PM, Evan Huus wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 6, 2014 at 12:59 PM, Alexis La Goutte
> > mailto:alexis.lagou...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, Jul 5, 2014 at 11:49 PM, Evan Huus
>
> > > It would be nice to have different tag
On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 12:42 PM, Bill Meier wrote:
> I've been working with the current 'pre-commit' and have noticed the
> following issues:
>
> 1. Using the current pre-commit which calls checkAPIs, etc, it
> doesn't seem possible to make changes to
> certain files (e.g., wsgetopt.c)
On 7/10/14 9:28 AM, Graham Bloice wrote:
> Folks,
>
> Can we consider moving to VS2013 for the windows builds, maybe moving
> the Win 8.1 buildbot to use it?
I need to renew my MSDN subscription but otherwise I have no objections.
__
I've been working with the current 'pre-commit' and have noticed the
following issues:
1. Using the current pre-commit which calls checkAPIs, etc, it
doesn't seem possible to make changes to
certain files (e.g., wsgetopt.c) and submit them to Gerrit.
- The files fail checkAPIs.pl a
On Thursday 10 July 2014 23:54:59 mman...@netscape.net wrote:
> The proto_tree_add_subtree[_format] code refactoring was very intentionally
> post-1.12 and I don't see much point to just having the API there without
> it. Further refactoring of specific dissectors like SSL and DTLS probably
> won'
Hi,
On Sat, Jun 21, 2014 at 10:12:48PM +0200, Jakub Zawadzki wrote:
> If we're in topic of optimizing 'slower' [de]allocations in common functions:
>
> - tvb allocation/deallocation (2.5%, or 3.4% when no filtering)
>
>243,931,671 * ???:tvb_new
> [/tmp/wireshark/epan/.libs/libwireshark.so
19 matches
Mail list logo
