Hi,
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 04:35:07PM -0400, Kevin Cox wrote:
2: Change everything.
Pros:
- Full compiler error checking and type safety.
Cons:
- Hard
- May change dissector API.
I was wondering what everyone else thought and what should be done to
improve the safety of this code.
a/
Does it really make sense to allow Windows builds without python installed?
IMO we should by now require python to be present to be able to build on
Windows (or any other plattform).
Ciao
Jörg
PS: In my opinion this is one of the cases which need to be discussed on
this list - too many
On 25/07/14 03:01, darkjames...@darkjames.pl wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 04:35:07PM -0400, Kevin Cox wrote:
2: Change everything.
Pros:
- Full compiler error checking and type safety.
Cons:
- Hard
- May change dissector API.
I was wondering what everyone else thought and what
On 7/25/2014 8:52 AM, Joerg Mayer wrote:
Does it really make sense to allow Windows builds without python installed?
IMO we should by now require python to be present to be able to build on
Windows (or any other plattform).
+1
Ciao
Jörg
PS: In my opinion this is one of the cases
On 07/22/14 16:27, Wireshark announcements wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I'm proud to announce the release of Wireshark 1.12.0rc3. This is a
public release candidate for Wireshark 1.12.0.
Hmm, the source tarball isn't in the expected directory (rc2 is still
there):
