While they were probably pushed from a single branch, the changes seem
"independent" enough, so I didn't try to find the "last" one to pick up all
changes. Hopefully it doesn't tie up the Petri-Dish too long...
-Original Message-
From: Alexis La Goutte
To: Developer support lis
On Tuesday 16 December 2014 09:24:50 mman...@netscape.net wrote:
> Am I correct in understanding most of the patches introduce "optional"
> features, so they shouldn't break existing cmake user setups (of platforms
> the Petri-Dish doesn't have)?
Yes, the patches should add new, optional out-of-so
On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 3:24 PM, wrote:
>
> I've kicked off the Petri-Dish for most (all?) of the changes. Am I
> correct in understanding most of the patches introduce "optional" features,
> so they shouldn't break existing cmake user setups (of platforms the
> Petri-Dish doesn't have)?
>
> Mich
I've kicked off the Petri-Dish for most (all?) of the changes. Am I correct in
understanding most of the patches introduce "optional" features, so they
shouldn't break existing cmake user setups (of platforms the Petri-Dish doesn't
have)?
Michael
-Original Message-
From: Maarte
2014-12-16 11:33 GMT+01:00 Vishnu Bhatt :
>
> TFTP is not the protocol which is mentioned after the crash, sometime
> SCTP, sometimes TCP, sometimes LTP etc. I haven’t introduce any changes in
> them.
>
>
>
> I’ve registered expert info in my dissector. Do I need to add something
> else in any oth
TFTP is not the protocol which is mentioned after the crash, sometime SCTP,
sometimes TCP, sometimes LTP etc. I haven’t introduce any changes in them.
I’ve registered expert info in my dissector. Do I need to add something else in
any other file to register expert info?
From: wireshark-dev-boun
On Thursday 20 November 2014 14:37:26 you wrote:
> On Thursday 20 November 2014 13:26:29 Bálint Réczey wrote:
> > I was waiting for Jörg to comment on the change, but I have submitted
> > it instead:
> > https://code.wireshark.org/review/#/c/5316/
>
> I saw, also that my two related patches are ab
2014-12-16 10:42 GMT+01:00 Vishnu Bhatt :
>
> Version 1.12.2. Actually I took the source code of 1.12.2 and added a
> few dissectors of mine. But the error which I am getting is not in any of
> those files. Even if I disable those dissectors, still I get this error.
>
The TFTP dissector contains
Version 1.12.2. Actually I took the source code of 1.12.2 and added a few
dissectors of mine. But the error which I am getting is not in any of those
files. Even if I disable those dissectors, still I get this error.
From: wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org
[mailto:wireshark-dev-boun...@wiresh
On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 10:18 AM, Vishnu Bhatt
wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
>
>
> While loading a capture file, it crashes immediately and I am getting the
> following error:
>
>
>
> Warn Dissector bug, protocol TFTP, in packet 72: expert.c:394: failed
> assertion "(guint)expindex->ei < gpa_expertinfo.len
Hello,
While loading a capture file, it crashes immediately and I am getting the
following error:
Warn Dissector bug, protocol TFTP, in packet 72: expert.c:394: failed assertion
"(guint)expindex->ei < gpa_expertinfo.len" (Unregistered expert info!)
Unhandled exception ("expert.c:414: failed ass
11 matches
Mail list logo
