Re: [Wireshark-dev] Feedback about Multipath TCP support

2015-01-08 Thread Jeff Morriss
On 01/08/2015 09:41 AM, Matt wrote: MPTCP connection identifiers are only sent during the 3WHS, or when there is a failure (I don't know if SCTP sends vtag/ports it in every packet ?) Yes, every packet has the vtags and ports. ___

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Segmentation fault on tshark

2015-01-08 Thread Pascal Quantin
2015-01-08 20:54 GMT+01:00 Alexis La Goutte : > Hi, > > > There is a problem with commit > a323f0ce3ed46bba7f593790da2256180ac479f2 > Author: Robert Grange > Date: Sat Dec 27 17:46:33 2014 +0100 > > packet-mq: Add New Def, Reformat Lines, re-order val_str def > > Add missing definition,

[Wireshark-dev] Segmentation fault on tshark

2015-01-08 Thread Alexis La Goutte
Hi, There is a problem with commit a323f0ce3ed46bba7f593790da2256180ac479f2 Author: Robert Grange Date: Sat Dec 27 17:46:33 2014 +0100 packet-mq: Add New Def, Reformat Lines, re-order val_str def Add missing definition, add new definition, Reformat some lines Re-order the value_s

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Packaging failure on Win7 with Qt 5.2.1 in "top-of-trunk"

2015-01-08 Thread Gerald Combs
On 1/8/15 7:24 AM, Graham Bloice wrote: > On 8 January 2015 at 14:12, Anders Broman > wrote: > > : > > File: "Wireshark.exe" 7732736 bytes > > !include: "qt-dll-manifest.nsh" > > File: "Qt5Core.dll" 4824064 bytes > > File:

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Packaging failure on Win7 with Qt 5.2.1 in "top-of-trunk"

2015-01-08 Thread Anders Broman
Graham Bloice skrev den 2015-01-08 16:24: On 8 January 2015 at 14:12, Anders Broman > wrote: : File: "Wireshark.exe" 7732736 bytes !include: "qt-dll-manifest.nsh" File: "Qt5Core.dll" 4824064 bytes File: "Qt5Gui.dll" 3819008 bytes Fi

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Packaging failure on Win7 with Qt 5.2.1 in "top-of-trunk"

2015-01-08 Thread Graham Bloice
On 8 January 2015 at 14:12, Anders Broman wrote: > : > > File: "Wireshark.exe" 7732736 bytes > > !include: "qt-dll-manifest.nsh" > > File: "Qt5Core.dll" 4824064 bytes > > File: "Qt5Gui.dll" 3819008 bytes > > File: "Qt5Widgets.dll" 5273600 bytes > > File: "Qt5PrintSupport.dll" 280064 bytes > > Fi

Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-users] Wireshark 1.12.3 is now available

2015-01-08 Thread Manish .
Hi Gents, Thanks for the response. >From the provided link, i got the below answer "Wireshark does not provide a UPP dissector though, unless you have a custom version / plugin." I believe UPP plug-in is possible but some custom way. Can you please provide me that custom way so that I c

Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-users] Wireshark 1.12.3 is now available

2015-01-08 Thread Manish .
HI Friends, I am confused with the two release of wireshark at a time (1.12.3 and 1.10.12) Can anyone of you please confirm which one is latest and recommended. Also request you to confirm which release is having upp, ranap megaco and iuup protocols. Regards Manish Singla __

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Feedback about Multipath TCP support

2015-01-08 Thread Matt
MPTCP connection identifiers are only sent during the 3WHS, or when there is a failure (I don't know if SCTP sends vtag/ports it in every packet ?) The "re-assign" problem occurs when wireshark does not see a TCP flow SYN packets (thus does not see the MPTCP connection identifier => assigns a new

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Protocol UPP is not available in wireshark release 1.12.3

2015-01-08 Thread Pascal Quantin
2015-01-08 12:21 GMT+01:00 Manish . : > [Changing the subject line] > > > > Hi Pascal, > > > > Thanks for your response. > > > > I found the UPP custom used for version 1.6.7. > > Please find the attached dictionary.kineto & upp.dll files. Below is the > procedure to apply this to 1.6.7 > > > > 1

[Wireshark-dev] Packaging failure on Win7 with Qt 5.2.1 in "top-of-trunk"

2015-01-08 Thread Anders Broman
: File: "Wireshark.exe" 7732736 bytes !include: "qt-dll-manifest.nsh" File: "Qt5Core.dll" 4824064 bytes File: "Qt5Gui.dll" 3819008 bytes File: "Qt5Widgets.dll" 5273600 bytes File: "Qt5PrintSupport.dll" 280064 bytes File: Descending to: "..\..\wireshark-qt-release\platforms\" File: "qwindows.dll" 10

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Protocol UPP is not available in wireshark release 1.12.3

2015-01-08 Thread Guy Harris
On Jan 8, 2015, at 3:25 AM, "Manish ." wrote: > I found the UPP custom used for version 1.6.7. > Please find the attached dictionary.kineto & upp.dll files. Below is the > procedure to apply this to 1.6.7 > > 1. Store upp.dll file to $wireshark/plugin/1.6.7(version) directory That won't work

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Patch being stuck

2015-01-08 Thread Dario Lombardo
On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 11:50 AM, Graham Bloice wrote: > > No blockage reason, just no-one on the core team has gotten around to > having a look at it yet. Submission to the Petri-Dish isn't (yet) > automatic, it requires a manual flag (from a core team member). > > Ok, that's the part I missed.

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Patch being stuck

2015-01-08 Thread Pascal Quantin
2015-01-08 11:52 GMT+01:00 Alexis La Goutte : > > > On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 11:50 AM, Pascal Quantin > wrote: > >> 2015-01-08 11:38 GMT+01:00 Dario Lombardo : >> >>> Hi list >>> I pushed a patch a couple of days ago >>> >>> https://code.wireshark.org/review/#/c/6350/ >>> >>> I think it's getting s

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Patch being stuck

2015-01-08 Thread Alexis La Goutte
On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 11:50 AM, Pascal Quantin wrote: > 2015-01-08 11:38 GMT+01:00 Dario Lombardo : > >> Hi list >> I pushed a patch a couple of days ago >> >> https://code.wireshark.org/review/#/c/6350/ >> >> I think it's getting stuck for some reason (not even the petri dish >> buildbot has pr

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Patch being stuck

2015-01-08 Thread Pascal Quantin
2015-01-08 11:38 GMT+01:00 Dario Lombardo : > Hi list > I pushed a patch a couple of days ago > > https://code.wireshark.org/review/#/c/6350/ > > I think it's getting stuck for some reason (not even the petri dish > buildbot has processed it). > > Other patches submitted later (eg. https://code.wi

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Patch being stuck

2015-01-08 Thread Graham Bloice
On 8 January 2015 at 10:38, Dario Lombardo wrote: > Hi list > I pushed a patch a couple of days ago > > https://code.wireshark.org/review/#/c/6350/ > > I think it's getting stuck for some reason (not even the petri dish > buildbot has processed it). > > Other patches submitted later (eg. https://

[Wireshark-dev] Patch being stuck

2015-01-08 Thread Dario Lombardo
Hi list I pushed a patch a couple of days ago https://code.wireshark.org/review/#/c/6350/ I think it's getting stuck for some reason (not even the petri dish buildbot has processed it). Other patches submitted later (eg. https://code.wireshark.org/review/6394 or https://code.wireshark.org/revie