[Wireshark-dev] Petri-dish buildbot - not finding QtWidgets/QLabel

2015-09-23 Thread Martin Mathieson
Hi, This must be something simple, but I'm trying to get a first version of the new LTE MAC statistics dialog checked in (https://code.wireshark.org/review/#/c/10578/). I'm getting this error: In file included from

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Petri-dish buildbot - not finding QtWidgets/QLabel

2015-09-23 Thread Alexis La Goutte
Hi Martin, It is because Petri Dish use Qt 4.x... and we need to add only QLabel (#include ), no need the QtWidgets.. Regards, On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 1:55 PM, Martin Mathieson < martin.r.mathie...@googlemail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > This must be something simple, but I'm trying to get a first

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Petri-dish buildbot - not finding QtWidgets/QLabel

2015-09-23 Thread Alexis La Goutte
On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 2:27 PM, Martin Mathieson < martin.r.mathie...@googlemail.com> wrote: > I uploaded another patch (no 8) to just include and added it > to the petri-dish (probably-doomed number 7 will run first...). > But I still don't understand why we get away with including >

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Petri-dish buildbot - not finding QtWidgets/QLabel

2015-09-23 Thread Martin Mathieson
I uploaded another patch (no 8) to just include and added it to the petri-dish (probably-doomed number 7 will run first...). But I still don't understand why we get away with including QtWidgets/QLabel in lots of other header files. Should they be changed too? Regards, Martin On Wed, Sep 23,

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Compiling a plugin

2015-09-23 Thread Juan Jose Martin Carrascosa
Graham and Dario, Many thanks for the info. The option Dario suggests seems good enough for this. I will try to use that approach. Analyzing the CMakeLists.txt file it seems it won't require a lot of changes. Thanks again. This definitively helps. Juanjo Martin On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 4:50 PM,

[Wireshark-dev] Compiling a plugin

2015-09-23 Thread Juan Jose Martin Carrascosa
Hi all, I am looking for documentation regarding how to compile a plugin without the build directory. For instance, imagine I develop a plugin and I want to share it with a colleague. He modifies something and wants to compile it. Does he need the full build directory? If any documentation

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Compiling a plugin

2015-09-23 Thread Dario Lombardo
Hi Martin Did you take a look at this ? https://ask.wireshark.org/questions/42914/build-a-plugin-on-linux It should answer to your question. Dario. On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 3:52 PM, Juan Jose Martin Carrascosa wrote: > Hi all, > > I am looking for documentation regarding how

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Compiling a plugin

2015-09-23 Thread Graham Bloice
Hi Juan, I vaguely recall some discussion on this, either in the dev,user mail lists or on Gerrit for change to make it easier to just compile a plugin. Unfortunately a quick search of the archives didn't find it. Probably in the last 12 months or so. There's nothing specific in the Developers

[Wireshark-dev] SPDX

2015-09-23 Thread Graham Bloice
I ran across this, it's about propagating licence info among a chain of software projects. http://spdx.org/about-spdx Is it something we should look at? -- Graham Bloice ___ Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list