[Wireshark-dev] Display Filters

2016-01-10 Thread David Morsberger
I need some help and advice on display filters because I’m new to the codebase. I’m trying to add the capability where a ‘http contains blah’ filter searches uncompressed HTTP content. I’m adding because we use ‘Frame contains’ and ‘http contains’ in our workflow to find items of interest in

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Compiling Wireshark with gcc-6: Lots of new warnings

2016-01-10 Thread Michael Mann
Did you have plans to fix them? I quickly scanned the list and found a few "true" bugs (packet-csm-encaps.c being the worst) A lot of them fall under constants/defines not used (tango_colors.h being the biggest offender). The tango_colors.h seems to be a C/C++ difference (we could make

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Wireshark 2.01 packages in Ubuntu ppa

2016-01-10 Thread Bálint Réczey
Hi, 2016-01-09 16:40 GMT+01:00 Peter Wu : > Hi Bernard, > > On Thu, Jan 07, 2016 at 12:31:12PM -0500, bernard ck Wong wrote: >> I have installed wireshark2.01 from the wireshark stable ppa on Wily (64 >> bit) and wireshark-gtk crashes immediately. The errors are in

Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 11980] The filtering speed is impacted by commit b344107d757466e0768a3ef8927852479e926cf6 (Make color filters part of dissection)

2016-01-10 Thread Anders Broman
Den 10 jan 2016 14:50 skrev : > > Comment # 6 on bug 11980 from Peter Wu > > You are right, coloring always need to happen (whenever color rules exist). > (What about tshark? Colors are normally not shown, but if the two > frame.coloring_rule fields are shown in the

[Wireshark-dev] Compiling Wireshark with gcc-6: Lots of new warnings

2016-01-10 Thread Joerg Mayer
Hello, I just compiled current source with gcc-6 and warnings as errors. Attached is the error log with the 351 files that error out. Ciao Jörg -- Joerg Mayer We are stuck with technology when what we really want is just stuff

[Wireshark-dev] Removing echld/ directory

2016-01-10 Thread Joerg Mayer
Hello, the echld/ directory is not compiled by default, has a IMO lousy code quality, no users in the current code base and will most likely not build with MSVC anyway (variable length array). I intend to remove it soon'ish if there are no convincing reasons to keep it (convincing likely to mean