Re: [Wireshark-dev] Wireshark from PPA

2016-12-24 Thread Réczey Bálint
Hi, 2016-12-24 14:16 GMT+01:00 Peter Wu : > Hey Dario, > > You can try to build Debian packages with: > > dpkg-buildpackage -b -us -uc -j10 To reproduce the package please run this in a directory not managed by git: dget https://launchpad.net/~wireshark-dev/+archive/ubuntu/stable/+files/wir

[Wireshark-dev] Enabling/disabling post dissectors

2016-12-24 Thread Michael Mann
I started doing some cleanup on the TRANSUM post-dissector (https://code.wireshark.org/review/19406). Included in that cleanup was removing an explicit preference to enable/disable the post-dissector (it apparently can be resource and processor intensive) because dissectors can already be en

[Wireshark-dev] After a long hiatus my XDR to dissector code can actually generate a dissector that works

2016-12-24 Thread Richard Sharpe
Hi folks, I have pushed some initial code to here: https://gitlab.com/realrichardsharpe/wireshark_rpcgen This code is based on the stand-alone rpcgen in Ilumnos. It can now handle all of RFC1832, I believe, but it is fairly rudimentary in the following sense: 1. It does not do anything special

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Packet sample repository/library?

2016-12-24 Thread Peter Wu
On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 03:51:51PM -0500, Jeff Morriss wrote: > On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 5:28 AM, Peter Wu wrote: > > > > 2) Won't be good idea to allow skip a sample from automatic testing > > > (because it is for GUI demonstration)? > > > > You can invoke individual tests (which is most likely w

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Wireshark from PPA

2016-12-24 Thread Peter Wu
Hey Dario, You can try to build Debian packages with: dpkg-buildpackage -b -us -uc -j10 (-b for binary, -uc/-us to avoid signing the builds, -j for parallelism) Kind regards, Peter On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 09:45:40AM +0100, Dario Lombardo wrote: > Hi Balint > I have installed the latest ver

[Wireshark-dev] asn2wrs again

2016-12-24 Thread Eliot Lear
Sorry to whine about this, but I'm struggling with the documentation a bit. I'm trying to understand what is necessary to cause wireshark to interpret a new OID in a certificate (a certificate extension- it's just an IA5String). Simply including the MIB doesn't appear to be enough (it's a very si

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Building latest Wireshark using VS2013

2016-12-24 Thread Graham Bloice
On 24 December 2016 at 10:31, Andreas wrote: > >> If I"m not mistaken, version 12.0.21005 was the first MSVC 2013 version. > >> Since 5 updates were released and we have no issue compiling the > Wireshark > >> code with MSVC 2013 Update 5. The download link can be found here: > >> https://www.mic

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Building latest Wireshark using VS2013

2016-12-24 Thread Andreas
>> If I"m not mistaken, version 12.0.21005 was the first MSVC 2013 version. >> Since 5 updates were released and we have no issue compiling the Wireshark >> code with MSVC 2013 Update 5. The download link can be found here: >> https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=48129 >> Once u