Re: [Wireshark-dev] Future of Wireshark's shared library ABI stability

2022-01-21 Thread João Valverde
On 21/01/22 09:44, Bálint Réczey wrote: João Valverde ezt írta (időpont: 2022. jan. 21., P, 1:29): On 20/01/22 21:24, Bálint Réczey wrote: Hi Guy, Guy Harris ezt írta (időpont: 2022. jan. 20., Cs, 21:52): On Jan 20, 2022, at 12:34 PM, Gerald Combs wrote: Q: Should *wsutil* be part of

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Future of Wireshark's shared library ABI stability

2022-01-21 Thread João Valverde
On 21/01/22 11:14, Bálint Réczey wrote: João Valverde ezt írta (időpont: 2022. jan. 21., P, 11:17): On 21/01/22 09:44, Bálint Réczey wrote: Hi João, João Valverde ezt írta (időpont: 2022. jan. 21., P, 1:14): On 20/01/22 12:41, Bálint Réczey wrote: Hi All, João shared his opinion abou

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Future of Wireshark's shared library ABI stability

2022-01-21 Thread João Valverde
On 21/01/22 10:46, Roland Knall wrote: May I suggest that we focus on the discussion at hand here. The discussion about the package itself seems to be better suited for the issue list specific for that package, as is the purpose for that list. This is about package code that lives in the Wir

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Future of Wireshark's shared library ABI stability

2022-01-21 Thread Bálint Réczey
João Valverde ezt írta (időpont: 2022. jan. 21., P, 11:17): > > > > On 21/01/22 09:44, Bálint Réczey wrote: > > Hi João, > > > > João Valverde ezt írta (időpont: 2022. jan. 21., P, 1:14): > >> > >> > >> On 20/01/22 12:41, Bálint Réczey wrote: > >>> Hi All, > >>> > >>> João shared his opinion abou

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Future of Wireshark's shared library ABI stability

2022-01-21 Thread Bálint Réczey
Hi Roland, Roland Knall ezt írta (időpont: 2022. jan. 21., P, 11:48): > > May I suggest that we focus on the discussion at hand here. The discussion > about the package itself seems to be better suited for the issue list > specific for that package, as is the purpose for that list. > > The issu

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Future of Wireshark's shared library ABI stability

2022-01-21 Thread Roland Knall
May I suggest that we focus on the discussion at hand here. The discussion about the package itself seems to be better suited for the issue list specific for that package, as is the purpose for that list. The issue here is, that with change https://gitlab.com/wireshark/wireshark/-/merge_requests/5

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Future of Wireshark's shared library ABI stability

2022-01-21 Thread João Valverde
On 21/01/22 09:44, Bálint Réczey wrote: Hi João, João Valverde ezt írta (időpont: 2022. jan. 21., P, 1:14): On 20/01/22 12:41, Bálint Réczey wrote: Hi All, João shared his opinion about the project's commitment to maintain stable shared library ABI within stable branches: https://gitlab.

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Future of Wireshark's shared library ABI stability

2022-01-21 Thread Bálint Réczey
João Valverde ezt írta (időpont: 2022. jan. 21., P, 1:29): > > > > On 20/01/22 21:24, Bálint Réczey wrote: > > Hi Guy, > > > > Guy Harris ezt írta (időpont: 2022. jan. 20., Cs, > > 21:52): > >> On Jan 20, 2022, at 12:34 PM, Gerald Combs wrote: > >> > >>> Q: Should *wsutil* be part of that stabl

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Future of Wireshark's shared library ABI stability

2022-01-21 Thread Bálint Réczey
Hi João, João Valverde ezt írta (időpont: 2022. jan. 21., P, 1:14): > > > > On 20/01/22 12:41, Bálint Réczey wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > João shared his opinion about the project's commitment to maintain > > stable shared library ABI within stable branches: > > https://gitlab.com/wireshark/wiresha