Re: [Wireshark-dev] CARES to old for CentOS8?

2022-09-30 Thread Anders Broman
Thanks for the MR Roland. Best regards Anders Den fre 30 sep. 2022 16:41Jeff Morriss skrev: > > On Fri, Sep 30, 2022 at 5:50 AM Dario Lombardo wrote: > >> Hi Anders, >> unfortunately this is a hairy issue. Redhat's policy about security is a >> bit puzzling. They patch (as told before) old vers

Re: [Wireshark-dev] CARES to old for CentOS8?

2022-09-30 Thread Jeff Morriss
On Fri, Sep 30, 2022 at 5:50 AM Dario Lombardo wrote: > Hi Anders, > unfortunately this is a hairy issue. Redhat's policy about security is a > bit puzzling. They patch (as told before) old versions to make them not > vulnerable, maintaining the same version number. This is weird since being > vu

Re: [Wireshark-dev] CARES to old for CentOS8?

2022-09-30 Thread Roland Knall
The c-ares library is not the reason for 3.6 being RHEL 8 last edition. The reason is Qt6 which is still not officially supported and therefore, as we recommend it at least for Windows and macOS makes an obvious difference. I took a look at the version used for centOS https://pkgs.org/search/?q=c-a

Re: [Wireshark-dev] CARES to old for CentOS8?

2022-09-30 Thread John Thacker
I agree with bumping the version in general, and I can agree that there are cases where increasing the minimum version saves a lot of headaches even if we don't need a new API call. However, minimum version increases can mean effectively dropping support for a given Linux distribution (at least ou

Re: [Wireshark-dev] CARES to old for CentOS8?

2022-09-30 Thread Roland Knall
Hi. Ok, maybe I have to clarify my thought process here a little bit. The original version we required as absolute minimum was released nearly 12 years (!!) ago. I needed a newer API call that would have been sufficiently supported with 1.11 or 1.12. But there were two considerations: first, we al

Re: [Wireshark-dev] CARES to old for CentOS8?

2022-09-30 Thread Anders Broman
Hi, I just have a problem with our policy here. If we require a certain minimum version of a library to keep our code simple and keep up with depreciation and API changes that is fine. But if we start to look at vulnerabilities where do we draw the line then? Latest qt? Glib? Etc. Why make it harde

Re: [Wireshark-dev] CARES to old for CentOS8?

2022-09-30 Thread Dario Lombardo
Hi Anders, unfortunately this is a hairy issue. Redhat's policy about security is a bit puzzling. They patch (as told before) old versions to make them not vulnerable, maintaining the same version number. This is weird since being vulnerable or not is something everyone in the world points out by l