Re: [Wireshark-dev] Is wireshark.org possibly hacked?

2024-06-25 Thread Gerald Combs
Each of the Sucuri issues should be fixed now. On 6/25/24 9:30 AM, Roland Knall wrote: We will be looking into it kind regards Roland Am Di., 25. Juni 2024 um 18:24 Uhr schrieb Triton Circonflexe mailto:triton%2benu...@kumal.info>>: It seems to be an issue with the placement of the clear/

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Is wireshark.org possibly hacked?

2024-06-25 Thread Roland Knall
We will be looking into it kind regards Roland Am Di., 25. Juni 2024 um 18:24 Uhr schrieb Triton Circonflexe < triton+enu...@kumal.info>: > It seems to be an issue with the placement of the clear/dark theme > javascript. > > I checked the about.html page with a simple "view source" and Firefox >

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Is wireshark.org possibly hacked?

2024-06-25 Thread Triton Circonflexe
It seems to be an issue with the placement of the clear/dark theme javascript. I checked the about.html page with a simple "view source" and Firefox is also complaining about the fact that the tag is not the root of the document. In fact, we see const currentTheme = localStorage.getItem(

[Wireshark-dev] Is wireshark.org possibly hacked?

2024-06-25 Thread Kate
or possibly a code review(of the website)? checked sucuri sitecheck : https://sitecheck.sucuri.net/results/https/www.wireshark.org warning.html_anomaly *Description: * We detected anomaly in HTML code placement. Typical anomalies are placement of scripts and iframes outside of the *..* block,