ecursive] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory '/usr/local/wireshark'
Makefile:2276: recipe for target 'all' failed
make: *** [all] Error 2
...
Anybody seen this?
Best regards
Andrei Emeltchenko
_
Hi,
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 03:12:08PM +0200, Bálint Réczey wrote:
> 2015-05-20 13:43 GMT+02:00 Pascal Quantin :
> > 2015-05-20 13:34 GMT+02:00 Andrei Emeltchenko
> > :
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> recently I hit following error when building
Index: epan/dissectors/packet-btl3cap.c
===
--- epan/dissectors/packet-btl2cap.c(revision 38619)
+++ epan/dissectors/packet-btl2cap.c(working copy)
@@ -1466,52 +1466,52 @@
},
{ &hf_btl2cap_info_f
Hi, I feel that opening bug for a simple patch is too much overhead.
Cannot this be managed like it is done in linux kernel?
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 6:49 PM, Stephen Fisher
wrote:
> Please submit patches by opening a bug at https://bugs.wireshark.org/ so
> they don't get lost? Thanks.
>
Hi Chris,
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 4:36 AM, Chris Maynard
wrote:
> Jaap Keuter writes:
>
>> We're not the Linux kernel, hence we have to find our own way forward.
>> We found that too many patches were lost in the email archives for
>> various reasons.
>
>> > On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 6:49 PM, Step
;
> Thanks,
> Jaap
>
>
> (1) I hope Gerald receives a pay check now and then of course, but he's got
> more on his plate in facilitating the project in more ways than you can
> imagine. He even puts in a few lines of code now and then ;)
>
>
> On Mon, 22 Aug 2011 11:1
Hi,
I was waiting this for a long time :-) Hopefully we can also use
wireshark-dev for sending patches
and development and redirect spam from buildbots to special mailing list ...
Regards,
Andrei
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 2:44 AM, Gerald Combs wrote:
> For a long time people have suggested that w
Hi,
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 10:36 AM, Guy Harris wrote:
>
> On Aug 31, 2011, at 11:27 PM, Andrei Emeltchenko wrote:
>
>> I was waiting this for a long time :-) Hopefully we can also use
>> wireshark-dev for sending patches and development
>
> We've been doing th
Hi,
I cannot build recent wireshark since it cannot fetch subj.
/usr/bin/perl ./tools/make-services.pl
starting to fetch
http://www.iana.org/assignments/service-names-port-numbers/service-names-port-numbers.txt
...
I guess this is because of my proxy. wget works fine.
Regards,
Andrei
__
"tsocks make" works, might be something wrong with very recent patches
to make-services
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 11:16 AM, Andrei Emeltchenko
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I cannot build recent wireshark since it cannot fetch subj.
>
> /usr/bin/perl ./tools/make-services.pl
&
download the file.
after I run "tsocks make" file was downloaded and next time works
without tsocks :-)
BTW: Can we use wget as it tries to use system defined proxies.
Regards,
Andrei
> On 9/1/11 11:54 PM, Andrei Emeltchenko wrote:
>> "tsocks make" works, might be so
Hi,
On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 7:02 PM, Stephen Fisher wrote:
>
> On Fri, Sep 02, 2011 at 12:02:28PM +0300, Emeltchenko Andrei wrote:
>> From: Andrei Emeltchenko
>>
>> Extended Windows Size and Unicast Connectionless Data Reception
>> shows wrong bits in l2cap extend
Looks like the last commit broke wireshark. I am wondering why people
do not make build check before commit?
In file included from ../../epan/proto.h:52:0,
from ../../epan/packet.h:29,
from ./ftypes-int.h:26,
from ftypes.c:27:
../../epan/ftypes/ft
Hi,
On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 10:03 AM, vijay wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I not sure if this is the correct forum to post this but, Could some one
> tell me if it is possible to install affix bluetooth stack in kubuntu?
> Currently BLueZ bluetooth stack is installed and wireshark requires Affix
Where did you
Hi,
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 6:37 AM, Guy Harris wrote:
>
> On Oct 27, 2011, at 7:50 PM, vijay wrote:
>
>> Can anyone tell me if wireshark support live capture of bluetooth traffic.
>
> On Linux, yes.
>
>> Wireshark wiki says libpcap supports live capture of bluetooth packets ,
>> Wireshark can r
ulated frame
> of length 3 and Ethertype 3?
Sorry did not get what you mean here.
Best regards
Andrei Emeltchenko
___
Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list
Archives:http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Uns
Hi Guy,
14.08.2012 22:26 пользователь "Guy Harris" написал:
>
>
> On Aug 14, 2012, at 12:49 AM, Andrei Emeltchenko wrote:
>
> > Hi Joerg,
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 05:37:35PM +0200, Joerg Mayer wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >
Hei, please check the patch for BT dissector
Index: epan/dissectors/packet-bthci_evt.c
===
--- epan/dissectors/packet-bthci_evt.c (revision 35027)
+++ epan/dissectors/packet-bthci_evt.c (working copy)
@@ -311,6 +311,7 @@
static const
Shall I create bug in bugzilla or mail is enough?
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 4:20 PM, Andrei Emeltchenko
wrote:
> Hei, please check the patch for BT dissector
>
___
Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list
Archives:
Hi,
I am trying to decode packets which are identified with channel ID
(Bluetooth). There is setup frame after which conversation starts.
Is there mechanism to identify packets based on (start_frame,
end_frame, channel_id)? conversation mechanism does not fit here.
Regards,
Andrei
__
make[5]: Entering directory `/usr/src/wireshark-repository/epan/dissectors'
/bin/bash ../../libtool --tag=CC --mode=compile gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H
-I. -I../.. -I./../.. -I./..-I/usr/local/include -I/usr/include
'-DPLUGIN_DIR="/usr/local/lib/wireshark/plugins/1.5.0"' -Werror
-DINET6 -D_U_="__att
Hi all,
I want to check what is the best way to convert code below to value_string
proto_tree_add_text(tree, tvb, offset, 1,
"%s%s%s%s",
(buf & 0x80)? "16kHz " : "",
Hi Ed
On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 4:56 PM, Ed Beroset wrote:
> Andrei Emeltchenko wrote:
>>I want to check what is the best way to convert code below to value_string
>
>>
>> proto_tree_add_text(tree, tvb, offset, 1,
>>
Hi, Can anybody check AVDTP dissector below:
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5525
I've done modification also to L2CAP dissector since current one can
handle only 1 conversation with similar channel ID (SCID, DCID). Those
IDs can be reused.
-- Regards,
Andrei
_
Comments?
> Hi, Can anybody check AVDTP dissector below:
> https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5525
>
> I've done modification also to L2CAP dissector since current one can
> handle only 1 conversation with similar channel ID (SCID, DCID). Those
> IDs can be reused.
>
> -- Regard
it confusing for me.
Please use patch from bug 5525, latest version is below:
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=5697
Regards,
Andrei
>
> Thanks,
> Jaap
>
> On 01/19/2011 02:07 PM, Andrei Emeltchenko wrote:
>>
>> Comments?
>>
>>> Hi, C
26 matches
Mail list logo
